I posted this before but when you see them, go back to the replay and watch... are they truly backwards passes? Some of hte ones called incomplete I saw were either forward passes or EXACTLY perpendicular to the QB.Originally Posted by PeteyKirch
I posted this before but when you see them, go back to the replay and watch... are they truly backwards passes? Some of hte ones called incomplete I saw were either forward passes or EXACTLY perpendicular to the QB.
The HB is behind the QB on the pitch 99% of the time. There are some where they are pretty much parallel to each other, but the ones I am talking about the ball goes behind the QB on a diagonal to the trailing HB. A few times it would hit a defensive player and be ruled dead.
Another close win. Was able to beat Nebraska in the rain with Michigan 28-27. Only 10 second half points total and the defenses dug in. Took the lead with 14 ticks with a 1 handed grab on 4th and 10. I'll see if I can upload the highlight.
Only 77 yards rushing for me, 88 for Nebraska.
demo or retail?
"E"
He's probably talking retail (since he has it), but I haven't seen it, and I went out of my way to test late pitches the other day.
Twitter: @3YardsandACloud
if its a forward pitch doesnt matter if its behind the LOS... but if nobody else is seeing it, and you tested it purposefully Jeff then im not worried about it
"E"
Well, I've just been able to do it three times in a row. However, on two of them the ball was going parallel to the line and on the third it clearly went forward about 3 yards ... so I'm okay with that.
So far I haven't seen any that went obviously backwards that weren't correctly called fumbles.
Twitter: @3YardsandACloud
ty sir
"E"
Yes... that JUST happened. Seriously though... it just happened a few minutes ago playing online against psusnoop.
I think what might be throwing Petey off is that it looks wrong. He's right ... the HB is behind the QB, and you'd think the pitch would be going that direction. Instead, the QB is throwing it much closer to parallel to the line and the HB turns upfield to grab it. But in actual gameplay, it does look and feel wrong. It's not until I look closely at the replays that I figure out what is going on.
Twitter: @3YardsandACloud
I was just checking to see if you saved that G, I was going to post it if you hadn't ( not that I enjoyed it really, lol) I kid it is and was fun to see the suction tackling not involved one bit in that play. Big big improvement.
ok G is starting to get a feel for that "sit back" move... thats twice ive seen him use it on big runs...
and yeah its nice to be able to do that without somebody warping right into your chest and more than likely knocking the ball loose...
"E"
What's nice is that it feels right. If you notice in the clip of the BYU run, the receiver makes the stop, but then has to take a full step backwards in order to get his momentum moving forward again. Whereas the Wisconsin HB is able to stop and go with relative ease.
http://www.easports.com/media/play/video/80513664
this was the 1 handed catch to win the game.
hey G if you aren't busy right now, I'd like to run one with you . Ready to test out my new playbook.
Yeah... I'll hop on now. Meet you in West Room.
The game feels great, however the cutting doesn't feel as natural. Something they could work on... but I cant complain this game is sweeeeeet.
Meet...does that mean there still isn't a proper in game invite system?
How are you doing that move? Down on the L-stick, I guess? I didn't have much luck doing that in the demo.
Correct... at least not that I'm aware of.Meet...does that mean there still isn't a proper in game invite system?
Yep. L-stick down. Not sure if it's a difference between the retail & demo or a matter of the defenders being lower rated, thus less likely to recognize the move and react.
Are you guys referring to ranked games not being able to invite?
Sent from my A500 using Tapatalk
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks