Made it to page 5 then got tired of looking. Simple question: Has anyone simulated say 6 years into the dynasty and checked ratings of players vs. original roster ratings. Here are the things that EA has never gotten right in the past:
1) Original rosters typically lead to a ton of near 99 talent guys before they leave and then there is a drop off.
2) Original rosters will have the best SOPH talent you are ever going to see in your dynasty.
3) Future rosters tend to mess up ratings due to randomization that makes no sense when compared to original rosters. Meaning, the CPU generated class might have the right OVR average rating for its running backs but some of the key ratings for running backs are too skewed when compared to the original roster. Like ACC might be extremely LOW with running backs, like OT like low which is STUPID.
4) Guys like Denard Robinson are IMPOSSIBLE to recruit. Sure you MIGHT be able to get a 5th year senior in the ball park of his ratings, but to get another QB rated the same as him in his JR year = IMPOSSIBLE
5) Teams are filling out rosters and depth charts properly.
6) Teams are recruiting to their team's philosophies. Option teams are recruiting FAST QBs.

I think that is enough to ask for now. Thanks