Ok guy, you butt into a conversation and make the below statement. I would say most people who read the below statement would agree that it sounds like your being confrontational. ...and then you end the statement with "Jesus Christ"

Quote Originally Posted by morsdraconis View Post
There's no freakin' way I'd pay $150 to play substandard forms of music. Jesus christ...
And then you call me high and mighty b/c you say vinyl is substandard and I prove you wrong? Dude, if you can't take someone proving you wrong maybe you should mind your own business.

Quote Originally Posted by morsdraconis View Post
I don't care about you admitting that you are wrong or not. I started by simply stating that in my opinion, vinyl is a substandard medium to listen to music on. Then you had to get all high and mighty about proving me wrong (showing something that has no scientific merit as there is no source quoted for your above information) which you still haven't done because you refuse to acknowledge the fact that the human ear drum cannot process any form of sound beyond 20mhz thus making your argument moot. The 22.5 mhz (digital) and 24 mhz (analog) produced by the various mediums cannot possibly be determined in a wide enough breath of tests that there is not any scientific study showing in favor in one way or another that it's even possible to tell the difference between the two formats, much less enough to know that one is better than the other.

Analog vs Digital Recording



But, whatever man. You like vinyl and think it's superior. Good for you.
Enough...moving on. You think vinyl is substandard I disagree.