The How Many Times Can Ram Be Wrong Thread

[baseballplyrmvp]

No ram. Don't even start.

[ram29jackson]

isnt it amazing how Aaron Rodgers just hits on last second bombs all the time ! LOL what a load of tv drama bull.

in light of Green Bay winning, I'm changing my pick tomorrow to Carolina over Seattle.

I originally thought they wanted Seahawks to Go to Green Bay. But it looks like they want Carolina to go to lose to who ever comes from the AFC.

Panthers
Steelers
Chiefs L
Packers L

[souljahbill]

I don't know what game you watched but Arizona won the game that played on my tv.

And it looks like someone's guesses aren't too hot this week.

[baseballplyrmvp]

Carolina is the 1 seed. And Green Bay lost.

And there you go again changing your mind like you do every time you get a pick wrong. You quickly change it so then when it's all said and done, say "see I was right!" Well, when you change your mind 50 times, you're bound to get it right once in a while.

[souljahbill]

Oh, and I guess that Super Bowl I "rematch" isn't going to happen.

[ram29jackson]

This will be the 13th time in the last 14 Superbowls that the AFC team is headed by either Brady, Manning, or Roethlisberger

anything can happen on any given sunday..but it ends up being the same crap over and over and over

[souljahbill]

The 3 best QBs in the AFC lead their teams to championships.

Who'd a thunk it?

[ram29jackson]

Quote Originally Posted by steelerfan View Post
No one cares what you think, ******. Go lick your mother's dry vagina.

well, thats a fascinating comment from a so called adult.

yep,two unrealistic fantastic finishes again today And I picked Panthers correctly.
But all this talk of Manning's decline and they get Pats at home. I'm taking Denver and Panthers.

[souljahbill]

1) Why were they unrealistic? Because they were close? Bah!

2) Hold on with the Panthers bragging. You just switched your guess. You didn't KNOW they were going to win.

3) Manning HAS declined. He's not remotely close to who he used to be physically. He just has a team good enough to cover his shortcomings.

[SmoothPancakes]

Lol @ soulja.
I've explained 3 times how your counter about the coach was bullshit. Just stop trying. Saying injuries are real doesn't mean games aren't staged. I don't give a heck where you say you worked.That means nothing. You are either lying or they don't mind if certain staff is that dumb. to call yourself a college educated man and say there's no way they practice certain things makes me question if you have any common sense at all.
Now,let's see.....
Who picked the niners and Panthers to win today? That's right,only me. I'm disappointed I was wrong about the jaguar game but of course the match up was weak teams so they can give you any outcome and you'll buy it.
You can't keep calling it luck. How many times can Ram be wrong?
I did better than you basing my picks on the outcomes I think the league wants while you try to base it on what you think is fan football knowledge and I'm doing better. Maybe you should pay more attention to the money lines and story lines.

do you understand basic math? who's in the top 2 in both pickems? I am.

you are in complete denial now with your cognitive dissonance

you have absolutely no reading comprehension. Where am I making excuses for being superior with my ability to pick winners better than the majority here?

I havent made a single excuse or denied one single thing.You just think you are watching random events on tv so actual logic confuses you.
You have no clue whether what you are watching is premeditated or not. You only can rely on belief that its true.

lol then why am I right a majority of the time? why am I at the top or top 2? If I was just doing it randomly I would lose more games.

you are forgetting I have 20 more years of watching this crap happen over and over again. You cant call it luck 8 weeks in a row.

who's still in first because he had a game he could throw away.

you are the one swallowing the nfl kool aid

but yeah, that blocked punt couldnt have possibly been planned to make the game exciting at the end....?

And just for the record, we're tied for first dipshit. Which is pretty ironic, seeing as you making good picks is apparently because you know the NFL is fixed and all this other retarded mumbo-jumbo, whereas I make all of my picks each week in less than 60 seconds just going down the list without putting any thought into my picks.

So all this magically knowledge you claim, and yet, you are literally no better than me at picking games each week. Nor CLW since he's only one point behind you and me. Nor are you that much better than cdj (3 points behind) or JB (5 points behind).

I guess all that self-proclaimed knowledge isn't doing you very much good. Guess you need to go buy some more of Touhy's books to up your level of superior knowledge. I'm sure he'll gladly take more of your money. Just those guys who run pyramid schemes, he probably loves suckers like you.

Looks like dipshit can't even back up his own talk. How you enjoying the smell of my ass douchecanoe?

So Smooth, he's only "guessed" correctly more times than you in two of the 8 weeks. hmmmm...... interesting.

Yep! Yet he's right, the league is fixed. We're all drooling masses while he's got some massive level of intelligence. Yet, he's only managed to barely beat me in 2 out of 8 weeks head to head. Yet all we hear about is how great his picks have been. Funny, I don't see where he went 15-1 in in a single week. I was one game short of being 100% perfect in week 3. Best he could do was 13, which was only the 4th best score in the entire group that week.

Guessed correctly? There's no such thing. I've made decisions based on what I think they want to happen and I've been right more than twice. You are the ones guessing because you think outcomes are random chance.
Again....I don't have to pick right to know deception is involved.Thats the whole point of deception.
It's still amazing to me that you are so immature you think last minute finishes are supposed to be common place. You are easily deceived because you don't even know what reality is anymore.
Guessing? I know what teams you'll pick week after week and if 8 pick like you I want lose any ground. You believe the chant "anything g can happen". If that were true you couldn't get 60 to 70 % of your picks right every week or all year and most everyone does. If I actually didn't know any thing or was guessing, 8d be 10 or more behind everyone.

College: So Bama lost to Ole Miss who lost to Memphis who got crushed by Navy...?

yes I picked Florida State and they lost but the objective was still met. They wanted to make Clemson look weaker and move them out of the top 4. Alabama moves up and ND moves in simply because that attracts more interest

So Clemson looks weaker because they beat a pretty good Florida State team? And Clemson is likely to be still #1 or at the very worst #2 (safely well above whoever is #3) in the next CFP rankings tomorrow? And Ole Miss losing to Memphis who got manhandled by Navy apparently makes Alabama (who lost to Ole Miss) look better? And Alabama beating LSU has nothing to do it with it. Yeah, that makes sense.

Lol at you trying to say games hardly come down to the last minutes and it happens again!
And I get something right again! Because I picked based on what the league wants,not on who you think the better team is.
But yeah,I'm just lucky again while you people who are supposed to know so much about football don't pick right.

Wow, you made one more correct pick this week than myself, cdj and CLW. And you finished FOUR correct picks behind JB this week.

And I still lead your ass in first place overall for the entire season.

Yep, you sure showed us.

Too bad I forgot to do it last week

But I'm not eligible for the prize. My prize is beating on a week by week basis.

Hmm, new CFP rankings. Clemson #1, Alabama #2, Ohio State #3 and Notre Dame #4.

So much for making Clemson look weaker and moving them out of the top 4 so that Notre Dame could be moved in.

hey slowpoke, where did I say it needed to be immediate? Clemson will be out of the top 4. I didnt claim it was this week. They were made to look not that good in the Florida State game and will eventually be moved down.

Ah, I see, since it didn't happen this week and you can't go "aha, I told you so!", now comes the usual bait and switch, " oh, I didn't mean this week. I meant next week" or my favorite, "I was a year early."

And technically, yes, it did need to be immediate. You said they were made to appear weak so they could be moved out of the top 4, Alabama could be moved up AND Notre Dame could be moved into the Top 4 because of the almighty "interest". You never said Clemson was made to appear weak so they could be moved out of the Top 4 a fucking month later. When you made that post, Clemson was #1, Alabama was #4 and Notre Dame was outside at #5.

Ergo (that means therefore by the way, I know this all can be a bit too much to process in your peanut sized brain), logic, actual logic, not your retarded brain dead head up your ass logic, suggests that post was made with the intention of it happening this week, not a future week. But I'm sure you were just a year early.

And I would love to know how they didn't look that good against Florida State. This isn't like Alabama beating Vanderbilt only 14-10 or something. Florida State is good. Lets see, last four years for Florida State, 12-2, 14-0 with and a national championship, 13-1 with their only loss coming in the College Football Playoff, and this year 7-2 with one of those losses coming at the hands of Clemson.

So it's fair to say Florida State is a pretty good fucking team. Now lets look at that game. Clemson never trailed by more than 7 points. And from the 11 minute mark in the second quarter through to the end of the game, Clemson outscored Florida State 20-3. Yep, Clemson definitely looked weak there!

I guess if beating a really damn good Florida State team by only 10 points means it makes them look weak and not that good, then I guess Notre Dame is the weakest team around! Only beat Virginia by 7. Only beat a bad Georgia Tech by 8. Lost to Clemson! Struggled to beat USC by 10. Needed a last minute touchdown to beat little old Group of 5 member Temple by 4. And only beat Pittsburgh by 12. Now THAT is being made to look weak and not that good.

Ram talking about picks when he's only 7 ahead of me, and I forgot to play one week

That's your fault,not mine.
This is about staged games,not how good you think I am at picking and yet I'm losing very little ground while making picks with my theory.
But you are also proving you need to know very little to make right picks because you missed a whole week.

lol well that was interesting. I figured they would have the Bengals win this week but lose next week so it was a better match up at 7-2 vs 9-0. and then have the Bengals choke because of course every star will align for the Steelers now like I said.
but you should be feeling insulted by being made to believe a sorry ass team with 2 pathetic back up QBs beat a team with no losses. And of course the game ended on a bizarre ass note but you think it all just naturally happens.....

Tyler Eifert: he cant catch any balls with both hands with throws right at him ....but everyone else is making one handed grabs all over the field? you are so freaking gullible

Um, oook? I couldn't even care less about whatever retarded shit you're rambling on about. I couldn't even care less about a game that was so god awful fucking boring that I turned it off at halftime. Hell, it wasn't even halftime. I turned it off before halftime! But you go ahead and keep crying and whining about whatever dumb shit your crying about this time.

By the way, I see they fooled and deceived your dumb ass into picking and believing the Bengals would win too. Nothing more than a sheep.

Damn the script for making Clemson look weak against Florida State so they could be moved out of the top four so that Alabama could be moved up and so that Notre Dame could get moved in. The Tigers deserve better from the script.

Oh, wait...

whats your excuse for ignoring that I basically got everything else right that no one else did? I'm still in first place if you didnt notice.

YES, I thought they would bunch everyone up and let SF win that game but I still got every early game right while the rest of you made what you thought were logical picks ( which they were,you just got screwed) this proves only that I cant predict the future but I was still better than everyone else because I picked based on what the NFL wants and not who I think is better.

No one is lucky for 2 months straight. Its not luck.

Oh and Ram went against the grain on the 3 afternoon games and went 0-3.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

you see....

week 10 should have taught you. They want to just have every week be a toss up and eventually have everyone like an 8-8 team with no clue who's winning.

ive explained 21 times thats not the point. Besides that I'd still be top 2 anyway. I dont have to know how i'm being deceived to know i'm being deceived. My picks are an experiment and you are the lab rats.
I've already created the file in your head and one day youll actually open it.

then do it and prove it. Intellectually thats a moronic statement to begin with and you know it

hey college educated guy,pay attention. If i'm getting picks right based on the direction I think they want to go,that means i'm doing more than just looking at each individual match up on its own. I'm seeing how each team and game affects the other i've been right numorous times picking teams everyone assumed was the underdog,while still staying in the top 2.I'm not picking who I think I would pick, or I would be in the middle of the bunch with the rest of you. You cant do that randomly out of a hat. You cant just get lucky 10 weeks in a row or pick names 10 weeks in a row to be successful.

dude,seriously, think about what you just said.

Where did I say blowouts werent staged games? blowouts arent boring as long as you are the fan rooting for the particular team. I know Romo's injury is fake like all his injuries the last two years as well.
blowouts dont nullify the fact theres too many unrealistic close finishes.
every offensive lineman was on the injury report for Packers before tonight's game but miracle of miracles, the game comes down to a final play with 30 seconds left.
that is fabricated,artificial, unnatural drama no matter how you try to defend it. ...and the Green bay receiver purposely dropping the ball in the end zone.

but everyone picked Green Bay and I picked Chicago because I knew they wanted to bunch up the division and give Minnesota an edge..and you can usually count on division teams having a 1-1 split.

I bought the Dallas hype...I still expect them to play spoiler. Smooth didnt buy the hype and he and I are the only 2-1 finishers today.

I'm not partial to blonds but...

well,well,it appears I might be wrong about Michigan winning but its obvious why when Michigan defenders just slow down, hold out their hands and fall down when Ohio State players run by lol.

but I doubt they want Michigan State in the final 4 and theyve been hinting at this mysterious C Cook injury where he might play or might not,all week.
its so there's a sports logic reason for Michigan State losing.
Just replace Michigan with Ohio State in the final four. Thats of course still more interesting to fans than Michigan State. And I still expect Clemson to lose next week.

and let me help define something for you children lacking in critical thinking skills. You'll say that because Michigan didnt win, I'm back pedaling or changing a narrative or what ever or denying being wrong LOL.
No, I am simply calling a lie, a lie. you can lie in a million different ways but you can only tell the truth one way.A staged game is a staged game no matter how they do it or who wins.

a billion dollar televion sports industry doesnt just let stuff happen

the Patriots are for all intents eliminated as I said the would be ( I said they werent making any super bowl) before the season even started. They'll be easily gone in the playoffs.
But I already knew that while the world bought the hype.

no, I didnt guess- @soulja- I picked Denver tonight based on that premise. But of course tv world milked every inch out of it

So Clemson is 13-0, ACC champs, the likely #1 seed in the playoffs, and will have the most awesome pizza party in history. Good job of making them look bad script writers.

I changed my mind lol
I'm taking Redskins tomorrow. Dallas will beat them the last game of season and be 7-9 and lose the playoff spot to Giants who are 7-9.
or NY will be 8-8 because they beat Carolina lol

well, gosh darn gee whiz. I thought for sure theyd want that decided in week 17. But none of my picks for Sunday will change and I know the same theme is still happening

looks like I was wrong about the winner of this game but of course another late game fantastic finish happened and you wont even think twice about how mathematically absurd that is.
The foundation has been laid though. That makes the Cardinals look weak against a depleted defense.They clinched but now they will lose and look weak for playoffs

No Seahawks? You'll be wrong in that.

Seahawks are now the 5th seed and also have the 5th easiest schedule remaining, ram. Looks like you will be wrong again

lol no it doesnt. You better wait till after week 17 to say anything

also..lets say they do get in. I know they wont make it past first round.

I am admitting I cant predict the future but I still know closer than any of you what the ultimate outcome will be and My leading in the pickem proves that to a degree.

but you will have no idea if they even make the playoffs till after the Cardinals game.




the hilarious part is you think all these possibilities are just naturally happening and a complete coincidence.


please stop saying "our".

no one on the Seattle Seahawks gives a damn about you

1) Seattle is beating Cleveland

2) Neither the Rams or the Bucs will be playing for a playoff spot.

The Seahawks and whomever is 2nd in the NFC North are getting in.

since The Jets won tonight, I had to change my picks for the week.
I believe the final outcome/playoff setting may be closer to this.

[IMG][/IMG]

of course this blows up if Seahawks win but I really dont think they are supposed to. Like I said, that just eliminates everyone for 2 weeks... and that's boring.

wowzers! thats fascinating...
they actually want to lead people on that Seattle still has a chance to get back to SB even before week 17.
Yes, I was wrong about that scenario but I know they will lose in the first round.
and I also know that if you picked the opposite teams to win in week 15 and 16 that the same desired set up happens for week 17.
in other words I know that the games I got wrong this week just means I have to pick the opposite next week of what I originally intended and I'll be fine.
I am going to get back the games I lost because I know which ones youll pick next week.
I know the Vikings will be in the Conference championship because they are hosting the SB next year with their new stadium ( the same circumstances as the Cardinals and 49ers in the past that you deny as another coincidence)
JB and CLW ,try and get your picks in so I can compare reasons for selection.

Chargers did win but I still find it odd that you picked them. I guess you think the point spread is some kind of gospel even though you keep getting screwed by it.

I know who will be in the conference championships. I just need to figure out the combination they intend to get there with.



the funny thing is...if Cleveland would have won you still would have bought it as real with your 'any given Sunday bullshit'...but since I said it would happen and it didnt,therefore I dont know what i'm talking about....?
That makes you intellectually inept hypocrites.

its staged regardless of outcome. I'm fascinated that you are so defensive and need desperately to believe its real, Without the slightest understanding of deception and propaganda.



in any case,stay safe and
Merry Christmas!

if they actually want Washington to win this game...I guess they intend to have Minn. lose to Steelers in the SB or have Seattle get there to lose to Steelers...?

I knew Minn. would go deep in playoffs. Building a new stadium and hosting the SB Next year...but I figured they would lose to NY in the nfc Championship.

this is odd. But it is after all for the owners and not for you.

Wrong!

thats not backpedaling by any stretch(i've explained that extensively 3 or 5 times). I'm not emotionally invested in anything since I know its staged in the first place.
I'm impartially observing/researching what they are doing. You are the one emotionally invested since you think I'm wrong because you think the games naturally played out.

you refuse to acknowledge that I was in first a majority of the time basing my picks on what the league wants.
As it got closer I was wrong about Giants but they made sure that possibility lingered till the last 2 weeks.


you refuse to achnowledge they in fact made sure certain teams won and lost to make week 17 more interesting and That I did pick Falcons and Jets based on that.
you again try to straddle both sides of the fence while I am firmly on one side.

[IMG][/IMG]

I knew Minn. would go deep in playoffs but I thought for SB 50 they wanted something more classic like Pitt Vs Giants.
Now it looks like Pitt vs Minn

Wrong!

Really funny how you mention the 2 games that you got right when no one else did but fail to mention the 2 you got wrong that everyone else got right.

As has been said multiple times in this thread...

When you get picks right, it's "oh look at me. I'm so smart because I know games are staged. I'm smarter than all of you even though I have SDS."

But when you're wrong, it's no big deal.

That plus he's in 3rd place


..............out of 3

http://www.feedyourneedtoread.com/fe...-books-vanish/

anyone read the above yet? what will your excuse be about the book and the author?

I thought Bengals had to win tonight to help Pittsburgh I didnt realize its just Jets who have to lose next week.
( but of course you believe a rookie QB getting 2 overtime wins in his first few starts. Why cant our lives be that exciting?)

I thought it would be Jets,Chiefs,Steelers ..The Jets will lose and Pitt will get in. But even when the Broncos are trash they still get their way in the AFC.
but you dont question that of course. @Smooth, year after year they get in the playoffs and yet hardly, except for the Elway twilight do they ever break the top spot.
they are basically Buffalo with just 2 more SB wins. Dont you ever ponder that?
They are more than Buffalo though..for what ever reason they get to be the AFC team that constantly gets a playoff spot.
they are 20-19 in playoffs but for the most part constantly break your heart when it counts.

Jets have to lose for Pitt to get in. Its going to happen
[IMG][/IMG]

Packers at Minn. in the conf Championship
Pitt at KC in Conf Championship
Pitt. Beats Minn. in SB

Minn. is going because they are hosting an SB and built a new stadium.Just like when the Cardinals and Niners went.
Pitt is going and winning like they always do because they are older NFL royalty and the NFL likes it that way.

Wrong!
Wrong!
Wrong!

Wrong!
Wrong!

no,..but I do think KC will lose to Steelers in the Conference championship.
but of course you choose not recognize why regions have multiple teams do well at the same time.

why do the Royals and Chiefs have post season success at the same time? just lucky?

the Carolina Panthers, North Carolina Tar Heels and Clemson Tigers are all having great years at the same time. Why?

see that? I've pinpointed two regions with multiple teams doing well at the same time and all you do is duuhhh its just a coincidence.

just like all the Teams in 3 major sports in the San Fran area doing well while a new stadium is being built there.

the Lakers do poorly but hey thats ok because all the sudden the Clippers dont suck anymore. They were just bought by who is now the wealthiest owner in Sports along with the Seahawks owner so they have to give him a return on his investment of course.

Wrong!

congratualations to Smooth!

I picked the wrong scenario at the end and it dropped me some games.
But I was absolutely right about Jets losing and Pittsburgh getting in. Did you really think the league wouldnt make sure that happened?



I'll say it again. I have picked games purely on what I think the nfl wants and that has kept me in the lead till the end. all our pickems have been based on my moves.
Next year I wont jump the gun and only go the opposite way on 2 or 3 as opposed to 5 or 6 games.

well look at that...
I picked the Vikings game and Pitt And the Jets correctly which sets up the playoff scenario I said would happen. I only got Denver/Patriots wrong but it wont matter
since both will lose.

Minn. will beat Seattle next week.

I only lost the pickem contest by 4. For a guy who is supposed to get so much wrong that is pretty fantastic.

http://www.feedyourneedtoread.com/fe...-books-vanish/
read that yet ?

Try again, you lost by 7.



Suck my predictive balls bitch!

Minnesota is going to lose to Seattle.

Correct!

So ram... Let's hear you eat some crow for being wrong on this.

Correct!

Lol. You guys are going to sit there and believe that the kicker made all those kicks and then blows it at point blank range wide to the left?
You're fools for the WWE/ NFL.

What this tells me is GB vs KC might be what they're leading too

Wrong!

Yet you said Seattle would lose because that's what the NFL wants. Don't spin this on us and play both sides. You were wrong again!

Correct!

I'll stick with Steelers vs Green Bay for now.

lets run down the list here:

the team that won-Seattle, was missing the Great Starting RB, 2 tight ends, and failed going on 4th down 3 or 4 times, gets their biggest play on a botched snap of their own doing...and still wins? bullshit.

the team that lost hit all its semi long range field goals but cant hit from point blank range wide to the left...? bullshit (they also destroyed the myth that laces need to be out because he made both in and out lace shots)
but you will continue to buy all the fantastic finishes......

next week I'm going with:
Packers
Steelers
Chiefs
Seahawks

its quite possible they could have Pats win next week..but I think they want to tease with a Super Bowl I rematch

Wrong!
Wrong!
Wrong!
Wrong!

You picked Seahawks, you don't get to change your pick and then try and claim you were right all along with the Panthers. Sorry, 0-4 for you bitch!

No no ram. You cannot pick the Seahawks because you said that they wouldn't make the Seahawks. Then they'd lose to the Vikings. You have to stick with picking against them.

Maybe Seattle won because they held the leagues top rusher to only 40-some yards rushing? Also Seattle didn't convert a couple 3rd and mediums in the 4th quarter. Had they converted those, especially on their last drive, the Vikings wouldn't have gotten the ball back and would've never been in a position to kick the gw field goal.

oh,looky looky

out of the freaking blue..
The Cardinals will be without Okafur and Redding against the Packers along with already missing Honey Badger on defense.

What a stroke of luck for the Packers offense.

Wrong again douchecanoe!

I was 3-1 last week. You wanna try again after your on the fence evaluations failed last time?
what top 4 teams? Cards are magically short 3 starting defenders now.
Panthers Defence is missing a cornerback. and Seattle beat them last year in the playoffs.
its myth bullcrap but the Packers and Seattle have playoff experience.
no one wants to see Pats in the SB again.

Let's get real, Sally, 2 home teams last week sucked but they got home games because they won their sucky division. I was only on the fence about 1 game, Pitt/Cincy. I was 3-1 too, genius. How's Minnesota doing? Hope their new stadium can help with their tears.

i think everyone was 3-1 last week We did a playoff pool at work and like 80% of the people were 3-1...... Nice work Ram, you really went out on a limb with your picks

isnt it amazing how Aaron Rodgers just hits on last second bombs all the time ! LOL what a load of tv drama bull.

in light of Green Bay winning, I'm changing my pick tomorrow to Carolina over Seattle.

I originally thought they wanted Seahawks to Go to Green Bay. But it looks like they want Carolina to go to lose to who ever comes from the AFC.

Panthers
Steelers
Chiefs L
Packers L

Sorry, you picked Seattle. No changes. You sucked, now sit there and accept it!

Carolina is the 1 seed. And Green Bay lost.

And there you go again changing your mind like you do every time you get a pick wrong. You quickly change it so then when it's all said and done, say "see I was right!" Well, when you change your mind 50 times, you're bound to get it right once in a while.

well, thats a fascinating comment from a so called adult.

yep,two unrealistic fantastic finishes again today And I picked Panthers correctly.
But all this talk of Manning's decline and they get Pats at home. I'm taking Denver and Panthers.

Gee, too bad you originally picked the Seahawks. But of course you naturally try to act like you picked the Panthers all along and it proves you're right about your retarded theories. Try again bitch!

1) Why were they unrealistic? Because they were close? Bah!

2) Hold on with the Panthers bragging. You just switched your guess. You didn't KNOW they were going to win.

3) Manning HAS declined. He's not remotely close to who he used to be physically. He just has a team good enough to cover his shortcomings.

In summary. you're a fucking clueless ass douchecanoe, your picks suck, I whooped your ass in NFL Pick 'Em so suck my balls!

[souljahbill]

LMFAO!

Welcome back, bud!

[SmoothPancakes]

LMFAO!

Welcome back, bud!

Yeah, I figured after being away for 44 days, I had better make it one hell of a return.

[baseballplyrmvp]

Lol. Nice!!! Good to see you again smooth

[ram29jackson]

Sorry, you picked Seattle. No changes. You sucked, now sit there and accept it!

what chidish ignorant stupidity on your part not wanting to deal with the actuality of staged games.
Trying to focus on me and not even getting it right when you do.
I did in fact change my pick to Panthers the night before the game and its documented here.
I did in fact do it because Packers lost their game.
I am in fact constantly in the top 1-2-3 of all our contests and was before I knew it was fake to begin with.

You ignore the constant fantastic finishes as though life somehow always works out that way. You ignore players barely getting hit and acting like they are half dead.
You see Brady complete passes with no defenders bothering his receivers and you think it means he's great when all it means is defenders are purposely staying off them.

anything can happen and yet its the same damn teams in the playoffs over and over again.

I give the nfl too much credit. I thought they would make it more interesting.
Put KC and GB in the Conference finals but have them tease and Pitt v GB gets in anyway.
But theyve dumbed down the public so much (you) that youll buy Brady and Manning getting there over and over again like the fools you are.

also, everyone on every forum keeps saying how sad it is the Manning isnt what he use to be and he should have retired...and yet the nfl keeps putting him in the win column lol.

this is the betting bait...theres no way in hell the Pats win next week (the nfl can do what ever it wants,they screwed you a million times already. They may well say FU and put Brady in)
but I think they give the public what it wants(-Luke vs Darth Vader-) even though its seen the same damn story before with Elway ( this makes it just as pathetic that they are using an aging QB that just happens to be on the Broncos again) same stupid story line but you buy it lol.

if you are missing 3 starters on a defensive squad,you should not win a playoff game. Those fake injuries were reported to get people to bet on green bay.(i'm still making the logical pick based on lies. If I still thought it was real,this would have pissed me off too because you cant win with 3 starters missing unless it bullshit. Just like SF making it to a SB with a secaond year barely used running QB)

Pacman was telling the truth- Brown did wink at him and tell him he was alright. The nfl prints that so you cant say they are faking something. They are admitting to you its entertainment right to your face.
The same reason they told you Rodgers was practicing bombs before the Detroit game.

lol at you 20 and 30 something children thinking you are remotely smarter than me on any level about anything. You intellectually inexperienced foolish young men who believe what ever you are told
and have no ability to research anything beyond a surface level skim.

I went 3-1 last week and 1-3 this week

this week Denver and Carolina will win.

while we are at it. You mean you still believe Seattle doing nothing right for most of a game and still almost winning it twice/three times since last year?

you believe point swing games where 31 point leads just evaporate?
Can you think for yourself about anything?

[SmoothPancakes]

Says the one who came in third place, out of three.

Nice picking there Ramgina.

[baseballplyrmvp]

Ram's post= blah blah blah

You're a fucking idiot.

[ram29jackson]

KANSAS CITY, Mo. -- Coach Andy Reid said the Kansas City Chiefs' deliberate pace toward the end of Saturday's playoff loss to the New England Patriots was part of their plan and that the Chiefs executed it well.

in other words,they did exactly what they were supposed to do and lose

[ram29jackson]

Elway=Manning
Broncos
the same stupid story line all over again.
Aging star finally has a defense and running game to help him win.

http://articles.baltimoresun.com/199...way-past-super

Elway's 0-3 record in the title game says more about the dreadful defense the Broncos dragged into past Super Bowls than his ability to compete.

Consider that the three quarterbacks who beat him combined to complete nearly 75 percent of their passes for 905 yards and 12 touchdowns. They averaged a numbing 14.6 yards per completion. Each was named MVP.

If there is a glimmer of hope for Elway this time around -- he has a better defense and a legitimate running game -- it may be obscured by the unrelenting pressure on the 15-year veteran.

"There's a lot more pressure on him [than anyone else]," said Denver cornerback Ray Crockett. "I wouldn't want his pressure. Here's a guy who's gone to the Super Bowl and lost three times by huge margins."

[baseballplyrmvp]

Manning had already won a super bowl though?

[souljahbill]

in other words,they did exactly what they were supposed to do and lose

Deliberate doesn't mean they were doing what their overseers told them to do. It means everything was carefully thought out and there was a plan taking place.

Get a thesaurus.