Quote Originally Posted by gigemaggs99 View Post
I'm no lawyer, but this doesn't seem like front page news. I mentioned or asked a while back, why on earth would XBOX1 or EA want to go through this again? Why would they touch this with a 10' pole?

There's too much legal baggage, the only way I can see them entertaining the idea is if the game was re-released as some sort of special edition and EA would make enough money on that "new edition" to pay off the ensuing law suits.

It's all fine and dandy that we "vote" on what the BC games will be, but when it comes down to video game companies losing money...they could give a shit about what we want or vote for...they aren't in business to get sued and lose profits. The bottom line rules the day, if they are going to lose money (by possible law suits) why on earth would they agree to that upfront?

If they did, I would be convinced 100% without a doubt they are complete idiots.

True but if you are going to include the game on the list to be voted for and if the game is in the top five pages and has one of the highest comment counts... you better be prepared to state WHY the game is not going to be backwards compatible. Simple solution... don't let people vote on it. Not all xbox games were listed.