View Poll Results: Do you think the NFL is rigged?

Voters
21. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    3 14.29%
  • No

    18 85.71%
Page 96 of 130 FirstFirst ... 46869495969798106 ... LastLast
Results 1,901 to 1,920 of 2588

Thread: The How Many Times Can Ram Be Wrong Thread

  • Share
    • Facebook
  • Thread Tools
  • Display
  1. #1901
    Hall of Fame ram29jackson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    10,052
    How convenient, Manning will break the record at home next week.

  2. #1902
    Hall of Fame SmoothPancakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    16,450

  3. #1903
    Hall of Fame ram29jackson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    10,052
    Quote Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes View Post
    Lol its the nfl that has your attention because you refuse to think for yourself. They took your blissful ignorance and threw it right back in your face today like a clown with a cream pie

  4. #1904
    Hall of Fame SmoothPancakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    16,450
    Quote Originally Posted by ram29jackson View Post
    Lol its the nfl that gas your attention because you refuse to think for yourself. They took your blissful ignorance and threw it right back in your face today like a clown with a cream pie

  5. #1905
    Hall of Fame ram29jackson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    10,052
    Those dinky injuries. Are they real or just for commercial breaks?

  6. #1906
    Hall of Fame ram29jackson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    10,052
    Another game coming down to the wire in prime time...but yeah,that's just normal. ...Who needs a starting QB when all these back ups are destroying the league?

  7. #1907
    Hall of Fame SmoothPancakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    16,450
    Yep, another prime time nailbiter, just like that Browns-Bengals game Thursday night. Total nailbiter!

    Of course you completely ignore that blowout of a prime time game. Well, other than trying to claim that ball spots are now rigged.

    Here's a suspicious ball spot. I think it might just be intentional!

  8. #1908
    Administrator JBHuskers's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    35,260
    Quote Originally Posted by ram29jackson View Post
    Lol its the nfl that has your attention because you refuse to think for yourself. They took your blissful ignorance and threw it right back in your face today like a clown with a cream pie
    This makes no sense. In actually the NFL has your attention even more with these idiotic ideas, especially the prime time one where a lot of the games this season have not been close.

    Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
    The dude abides.

  9. #1909
    Hall of Fame ram29jackson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    10,052
    College: So Bama lost to Ole Miss who lost to Memphis who got crushed by Navy...?

    yes I picked Florida State and they lost but the objective was still met. They wanted to make Clemson look weaker and move them out of the top 4. Alabama moves up and ND moves in simply because that attracts more interest

  10. #1910
    Heisman souljahbill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    6,691
    Quote Originally Posted by ram29jackson View Post
    College: So Bama lost to Ole Miss who lost to Memphis who got crushed by Navy...?

    yes I picked Florida State and they lost but the objective was still met. They wanted to make Clemson look weaker and move them out of the top 4. Alabama moves up and ND moves in simply because that attracts more interest
    *Waits for Clemson to remain #1*

  11. #1911
    Hall of Fame SmoothPancakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    16,450
    So Clemson looks weaker because they beat a pretty good Florida State team? And Clemson is likely to be still #1 or at the very worst #2 (safely well above whoever is #3) in the next CFP rankings tomorrow? And Ole Miss losing to Memphis who got manhandled by Navy apparently makes Alabama (who lost to Ole Miss) look better? And Alabama beating LSU has nothing to do it with it. Yeah, that makes sense.


  12. #1912
    Hall of Fame SmoothPancakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    16,450
    I don't even know what the hell Clemson has to do with all of this. Notre Dame moves into the Top 4 solely on the basis of LSU (last week's #2) losing to Alabama. What the fuck does trying to make Clemson appear weak (despite beating a good, high ranked Florida State team) have to do with anything?

  13. #1913
    Hall of Fame ram29jackson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    10,052
    Quote Originally Posted by JBHuskers View Post
    This makes no sense. In actually the NFL has your attention even more with these idiotic ideas, especially the prime time one where a lot of the games this season have not been close.

    Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
    makes no sense? i pointed out that they gave a majority of unrealistic winning teams this week. Theres no way in heck SF should have won. They had too many games this week of teams with back up QBs and injured players winning and keeping games close. Pure WWE crap and you still buy it.

    you are in denial to not believe more games come down to the last 2 minutes than should. Also an unrealistic amount of overtime games.

  14. #1914
    Heisman souljahbill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    6,691
    Quote Originally Posted by ram29jackson View Post
    makes no sense? i pointed out that they gave a majority of unrealistic winning teams this week. Theres no way in heck SF should have won. They had too many games this week of teams with back up QBs and injured players winning and keeping games close. Pure WWE crap and you still buy it.

    you are in denial to not believe more games come down to the last 2 minutes than should. Also an unrealistic amount of overtime games.
    So how many games per week should be close? What's a "realistic" amount?

  15. #1915
    Administrator JBHuskers's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    35,260
    Quote Originally Posted by ram29jackson View Post
    makes no sense? i pointed out that they gave a majority of unrealistic winning teams this week. Theres no way in heck SF should have won. They had too many games this week of teams with back up QBs and injured players winning and keeping games close. Pure WWE crap and you still buy it.

    you are in denial to not believe more games come down to the last 2 minutes than should. Also an unrealistic amount of overtime games.
    We were talking PRIMETIME games, and you change the subject to games that we weren't even talking about
    The dude abides.

  16. #1916
    Hall of Fame SmoothPancakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    16,450
    Quote Originally Posted by JBHuskers View Post
    We were talking PRIMETIME games, and you change the subject to games that we weren't even talking about
    That's all he does is deflect and change the subject with every single post.

  17. #1917
    Heisman psuexv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Central PA
    Posts
    8,037
    I love how because teams win with backup QBs it can't be real. These guys are in the NFL for a reason, they aren't talentless twits coming off the street. They are still some of the top best 50 QBs around. And one particular game that you point out was the Steelers game. Obviously you didn't watch the game because the backup QB had nothing to do with them winning. They had a nice lead when Ben went out and Jones did nothing to extend that lead after he came in. He hit one pass that matter and Brown was wide open, once again a throw that any QB in the NFL, starter or 2nd string should be able to make.

  18. #1918
    Administrator JBHuskers's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    35,260
    Quote Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes View Post
    That's all he does is deflect and change the subject with every single post.
    Which is why nobody believes the utter shit that he types.
    The dude abides.

  19. #1919
    Heisman psuexv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Central PA
    Posts
    8,037
    I still don't understand how Clemson looks weaker? They beat at top 25 team by 10. Will Bama move up to #1, maybe. But it's because they beat the #2 team.

  20. #1920
    Heisman psuexv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Central PA
    Posts
    8,037
    Nevermind.... I found proof that this week made Clemson look weaker.

    AP Top 25 poll: Clemson overtakes Ohio State for No. 1 spot

    Oh wait.... no it doesn't. It's PROOF that they don't appear weaker.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •