Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Yes
No
Still waiting on proof. Some proof. Any proof. Of anything.
There are 87 or so pages full of no proof.Still waiting on proof. Some proof. Any proof. Of anything.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
The dude abides.
Yep, Ram has yet to figure out that just because he claims it is so, that doesn't make it true nor is it proof.
And just because the same random ass Nigerian prince dude on the internet who fooled Ram into believing this crap claims that it is so, does not make it true nor is it proof either.
I will admit, that random ass dude has got some good game! Get gullible morons on the internet to spend money on his books and whatever else he may be selling, and make some easy cash! There's a sucker born every minute that you can fleece for some quick cash.
The dude abides.
I'm not actually avoiding it at all. In no place did I post that it didn't end in dramatic finish. What I'm saying is that the rest of the game was boring and that a person who is watching that isn't a fan of either of those teams isn't going to stay up to watch a boring game and would have missed the dramatic ending. Thus, if the game was staged that way it is an epic fail by the league as the mass audience didn't see the ending.
LMFAO!
I'm not kidding either. I really did laugh incredibly loud at the italic part.
This is EASILY, BY FAR and BAR NONE, the FUNNIEST thing Ram has EVER posted on this site.
Calling someone out for avoiding and and ignoring something. Absolutely hysterical.
Yeah considering ignoring facts plays a part in all of his posts.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
The dude abides.
It was a PBS show in 1983 that only aired once. Proof? The majority I've presented is circumstantial evidence.YouTube videos by "American Mysteries and Conspiracies.". Great proof!
My understanding is you believe in God. There isn't a lawyer Christian or otherwise who could prove the existence of God in court.
Court and law isn't based in truth and man is fallible.
Your deductive reasoning is so childish,you simply can't see defenders just falling down when they get near Russell Wilson. To make it look like he's a good scrambler.
Proof is not the same as truth.
I'm the only one stating facts. You rely on sports cliches for your reasoning.
You were saying?
You have yet to state one fact. You have stated nothing but your opinion. Opinion does not equal fact. If we were to take all of your "facts" and place them into a box, this is what we would have:
It ain't over til it's over.
We gotta take it one day at a time.
It's gut check time.
We have the utmost respect for them.
He's the first person in the building and the last one out.
He does all the little things.
It's do or die.
They won't be denied today.
He overcame a ton of adversity.
On paper they're the team to beat.
Defense wins championships.
They really put forth a great effort.
It is a game of inches.
It's been a tale of two halves.
The dude abides.
You seriously think a multi billion company is dumb enough to let that be a random accident on tv when they've been doing it since the 60s?The refs also had a 20+ second runoff on a touchback that nobody caught with just over two minutes to go. But aparrently the NFL is too busy cracking down on Twitter vines with nfl footage to care.
It was done on purpose simply so the fan would have more dumb crap to talk about. It's professional tv created drama.
It's fascinating that the common man thinks he's smarter than billlionaires. Each week they complain about refs so called mistakes.
If it's happening that often it's obviously on purpose. Why is that so hard to fathom?
#Script
Once again, proof that it was done on purpose? Oh, that's right! No proof. I forgot.
So, when a common man becomes a billionaire, does he become a paradox?
About 31 minutes in,the commissioner admits they cover things up.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=K1X-YPjOwG0
You were saying?
You don't want proven facts that are true.You want perceived facts that you agree with. I possess truth.You possess hope based on false perception.
You need to take more logic and critical thinking courses.
Your silly monkey skills being able to Google a definition in no way proves games aren't staged.
Where is your ability to prove a player dropped a ball because he purposely tried to catch it but missed? You assume that's fact with no proof of your own.
About 31 1 post in, everyone realized that you're full of shit
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
The dude abides.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks