As a black person, this white lady thing is they stupidest "story" to ever become a thing. Too many social media psychologist giving their opinion about a non-issue.
As a black person, this white lady thing is they stupidest "story" to ever become a thing. Too many social media psychologist giving their opinion about a non-issue.
Now, are you sure you're black? I mean, are you really black or do you simply identify as black?Originally Posted by souljahbill
It's interesting that you said, "person". That suggests that you do not specifically identify with a particular sex. When you close your eyes, do you see yourself as a man, a woman, both or neither?
*looks at self*
I'm pretty sure I'm black......and that I'm a person.
You got what you asked for: http://www.today.com/news/rachel-dol...gnation-t26371I was just telling my business partner the same thing. Just say, "I identify as a black person."
I'm not sure that would soothe whatever black person should have held that position while the white bitch did though.
Rachel Dolezal breaks her silence on TODAY: 'I identify as black'
Twitter: @3YardsandACloud
She may identify as black, but she is nothing more than a white girl pretending to be a black girl. The quote she gave regarding something one of her sons said yesterday is perfect. "Racially, she's human (or in legal terms, white), ETHNICALLY she's black." She may consider herself black and want to live a black lifestyle, but no matter what, she will always racially be white.
All she has done with this whole saga is live a giant lie. Everything in her life since she got a dark tan and a hair weave is a complete lie. And if she has indeed been listing her race as black on any forms, applications, financial forms, legal documents, federal forms, etc, swearing all of the information she has listed is true and accurate, then she has committed countless acts of perjury.
And if she has in anyway financially profited from listing her race as black (scholarships, jobs, promotions, bank loans, home loans, etc), then she has committed fraud.
So.... she's just another liberal race baiter?
On MSNBC (go figure) some moron said this woman was more black than Clarence Thomas:
Wow. Even I have no words for that.So.... she's just another liberal race baiter?
On MSNBC (go figure) some moron said this woman was more black than Clarence Thomas:
I'm not denying she may feel more comfortable living life pretending to be a black woman, but racially and legally, she is white, has always been white and will always be white. She may consider herself a black woman and ethnically live like a black woman, but she will always legally be white. That's what makes this whole thing ridiculous.
Smooth, you need to get with the times....men identify as women, women as men and anyone raising a question is shouted down as an intolerant bigot. I guarantee if this person were a protected class identifying as white they would be a celebrated media darling......
I continue planning my exit strategy from the asylum.
BTW smooth just in case, I agree with you......just want these things dealt with consistently by government and media.
ding ding ding.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documen...lawsuit-786451
JUNE 15--The NAACP official who today resigned in the face of evidence that she masqueraded as black once sued Howard University for denying her teaching posts and a scholarship because she was a white woman, The Smoking Gun has learned.
Rachel Dolezal, 37, who headed the NAACP’s Spokane, Washington chapter, sued Howard for discrimination in 2002, the year she graduated from the historically black college with a Master of Fine Arts degree.
Dolezal, then known as Rachel Moore, named the university and Professor Alfred Smith as defendants in a lawsuit filed in Washington, D.C.’s Superior Court. During the pendency of the civil case, Smith was chairman of Howard’s Department of Art.
According to a Court of Appeals opinion, Dolezal's lawsuit “claimed discrimination based on race, pregnancy, family responsibilities and gender.” She alleged that Smith and other school officials improperly blocked her appointment to a teaching assistant post, rejected her application for a post-graduate instructorship, and denied her scholarship aid while she was a student.
The court opinion also noted that Dolezal claimed that the university’s decision to remove some of her artworks from a February 2001 student exhibition was “motivated by a discriminatory purpose to favor African-American students over” her.
As detailed in the court opinion, Dolezal’s lawsuit contended that Howard was “permeated with discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult.”
Judge Zoe Bush dismissed Dolezal’s complaint in February 2004, 18 months after the lawsuit was filed and Dolezal was deposed on several occasions. Bush found no evidence that Dolezal was discriminated on the basis of race or other factors. The D.C. Court of Appeals subsequently affirmed Bush’s decision.
Following the dismissal of Dolezal’s lawsuit (and the Court of Appeals decision), she was ordered to reimburse Howard for a “Bill of Costs” totaling $2728.50. During the case, she was also ordered to pay the university nearly $1000 in connection with an “obstructive and vexatious” court filing that sought to improperly delay her examination by an independent doctor.
Dolezal’s lawsuit included “claims for medical and emotional distress damages,” according to a court docket. (5 pages)
Thought this might generate some interesting discussion in this thread...
Last edited by JeffHCross; 06-17-2015 at 12:11 AM.
Twitter: @3YardsandACloud
Several people are going to jail the question is how high in the organization goes up and how big of a punishment does the MLB hand out. Of course, Ram will now predict a Houston v. St. Louis world series to drive ratings and have all baseball talk revolve around hackgate
But she says she IS black. Now she and many liberal commentators are equating it with the LGTB movement and the Jenner story and apparently they want it to be known as some type of "trans racial" or whatever PC nonsense the left will come up with to defend a clear liar/fraud/con artist.
The thing most "interesting" about this story is how the left, democrats and the race baiters will/do accept her as "black". On the other hand they completely reject as "black": Thomas; Sowell; Carson; Rice; Scott; Riley etc....
In their world view, being black is an ideology not a race/ethnicity. Therefore, if you are white but want to call yourself black it O.K. so long as you toe the line on the left's ideology. However, if you happen to be a black conservative you are "not really black" or are some sort of "Uncle Tom" etc...
This is another made up none story. Look at Houstons football and baseball teams historically. They've remained a tax write off.
going to jail for one team hacking another ? LOL
this is basically the idiocy that comes from- "I think therefore I am."
and the fifth place trophy crowd. Enabling people to do what they want.
Wow, you just went full dumbass.
It's more than one team hacking another. It'd be like Microsoft hacking Apple or any of the never ending cases of companies being hacked by hackers from foreign countries. It's a FEDERAL FUCKING CRIME you dumbshit! It doesn't matter one damn bit that it was the Cardinals hacking the Astros. Plain and simple, a federal crime was committed, and people go to "pound me in the fucking ass" federal prison for committing federal crimes.
I'm not the dumb ass believing the story. I know sports is entertainment therefore there is no reason for one team to hack another because no advantage is gained. If they do make up some story that someone goes to jail it will be a behind the scenes person you've never seen and you will have no idea if anything physically happened to anyone. You are calling me stupid and yet you are making a million assumptions based on faith.Wow, you just went full dumbass.
It's more than one team hacking another. It'd be like Microsoft hacking Apple or any of the never ending cases of companies being hacked by hackers from foreign countries. It's a FEDERAL FUCKING CRIME you dumbshit! It doesn't matter one damn bit that it was the Cardinals hacking the Astros. Plain and simple, a federal crime was committed, and people go to "pound me in the fucking ass" federal prison for committing federal crimes.
LOL its not even close. this is the equivalent of rival sports forums hacking each other. Nobody caresIt'd be like Microsoft hacking Apple
.Plain and simple, a federal crime was committed, and people go to "pound me in the fucking ass" federal prison for committing federal crimes
no, they go to white collar prisons for those
Jesus Tittyfucking Christ. You really are fucking delusional and off your nutjob medication.
And no, it is not the "equivalent of rival sports forums hacking each other". Dear god you fucking ignorant and naive.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks