As a black person, this white lady thing is they stupidest "story" to ever become a thing. Too many social media psychologist giving their opinion about a non-issue.
Printable View
As a black person, this white lady thing is they stupidest "story" to ever become a thing. Too many social media psychologist giving their opinion about a non-issue.
Now, are you sure you're black? I mean, are you really black or do you simply identify as black?Quote:
Originally Posted by souljahbill
It's interesting that you said, "person". That suggests that you do not specifically identify with a particular sex. When you close your eyes, do you see yourself as a man, a woman, both or neither?
Quote:
Originally Posted by souljahbill
Quote:
Originally Posted by steelerfan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8wrqe72YG4
*looks at self*Quote:
Originally Posted by steelerfan
I'm pretty sure I'm black......and that I'm a person.
You got what you asked for: http://www.today.com/news/rachel-dol...gnation-t26371Quote:
Originally Posted by steelerfan
Rachel Dolezal breaks her silence on TODAY: 'I identify as black'
She may identify as black, but she is nothing more than a white girl pretending to be a black girl. The quote she gave regarding something one of her sons said yesterday is perfect. "Racially, she's human (or in legal terms, white), ETHNICALLY she's black." She may consider herself black and want to live a black lifestyle, but no matter what, she will always racially be white.
All she has done with this whole saga is live a giant lie. Everything in her life since she got a dark tan and a hair weave is a complete lie. And if she has indeed been listing her race as black on any forms, applications, financial forms, legal documents, federal forms, etc, swearing all of the information she has listed is true and accurate, then she has committed countless acts of perjury.
And if she has in anyway financially profited from listing her race as black (scholarships, jobs, promotions, bank loans, home loans, etc), then she has committed fraud.
So.... she's just another liberal race baiter?Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
On MSNBC (go figure) some moron said this woman was more black than Clarence Thomas:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...S_portrait.jpg
Wow. Even I have no words for that.Quote:
Originally Posted by CLW
I'm not denying she may feel more comfortable living life pretending to be a black woman, but racially and legally, she is white, has always been white and will always be white. She may consider herself a black woman and ethnically live like a black woman, but she will always legally be white. That's what makes this whole thing ridiculous.
Smooth, you need to get with the times....men identify as women, women as men and anyone raising a question is shouted down as an intolerant bigot. I guarantee if this person were a protected class identifying as white they would be a celebrated media darling......
I continue planning my exit strategy from the asylum.
BTW smooth just in case, I agree with you......just want these things dealt with consistently by government and media.
ding ding ding.Quote:
Originally Posted by CLW
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documen...lawsuit-786451
http://thesmokinggun.com/sites/defau...heldolezal.jpgQuote:
JUNE 15--The NAACP official who today resigned in the face of evidence that she masqueraded as black once sued Howard University for denying her teaching posts and a scholarship because she was a white woman, The Smoking Gun has learned.
Rachel Dolezal, 37, who headed the NAACP’s Spokane, Washington chapter, sued Howard for discrimination in 2002, the year she graduated from the historically black college with a Master of Fine Arts degree.
Dolezal, then known as Rachel Moore, named the university and Professor Alfred Smith as defendants in a lawsuit filed in Washington, D.C.’s Superior Court. During the pendency of the civil case, Smith was chairman of Howard’s Department of Art.
According to a Court of Appeals opinion, Dolezal's lawsuit “claimed discrimination based on race, pregnancy, family responsibilities and gender.” She alleged that Smith and other school officials improperly blocked her appointment to a teaching assistant post, rejected her application for a post-graduate instructorship, and denied her scholarship aid while she was a student.
The court opinion also noted that Dolezal claimed that the university’s decision to remove some of her artworks from a February 2001 student exhibition was “motivated by a discriminatory purpose to favor African-American students over” her.
As detailed in the court opinion, Dolezal’s lawsuit contended that Howard was “permeated with discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult.”
Judge Zoe Bush dismissed Dolezal’s complaint in February 2004, 18 months after the lawsuit was filed and Dolezal was deposed on several occasions. Bush found no evidence that Dolezal was discriminated on the basis of race or other factors. The D.C. Court of Appeals subsequently affirmed Bush’s decision.
Following the dismissal of Dolezal’s lawsuit (and the Court of Appeals decision), she was ordered to reimburse Howard for a “Bill of Costs” totaling $2728.50. During the case, she was also ordered to pay the university nearly $1000 in connection with an “obstructive and vexatious” court filing that sought to improperly delay her examination by an independent doctor.
Dolezal’s lawsuit included “claims for medical and emotional distress damages,” according to a court docket. (5 pages)
Thought this might generate some interesting discussion in this thread...
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffHCross
Several people are going to jail the question is how high in the organization goes up and how big of a punishment does the MLB hand out. Of course, Ram will now predict a Houston v. St. Louis world series to drive ratings and have all baseball talk revolve around hackgateQuote:
Originally Posted by JeffHCross
But she says she IS black. Now she and many liberal commentators are equating it with the LGTB movement and the Jenner story and apparently they want it to be known as some type of "trans racial" or whatever PC nonsense the left will come up with to defend a clear liar/fraud/con artist.Quote:
Originally Posted by souljahbill
The thing most "interesting" about this story is how the left, democrats and the race baiters will/do accept her as "black". On the other hand they completely reject as "black": Thomas; Sowell; Carson; Rice; Scott; Riley etc....
In their world view, being black is an ideology not a race/ethnicity. Therefore, if you are white but want to call yourself black it O.K. so long as you toe the line on the left's ideology. However, if you happen to be a black conservative you are "not really black" or are some sort of "Uncle Tom" etc...
This is another made up none story. Look at Houstons football and baseball teams historically. They've remained a tax write off.Quote:
Originally Posted by CLW
going to jail for one team hacking another ? LOL
this is basically the idiocy that comes from- "I think therefore I am."Quote:
Originally Posted by CLW
and the fifth place trophy crowd. Enabling people to do what they want.
Wow, you just went full dumbass. :fp:Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
It's more than one team hacking another. It'd be like Microsoft hacking Apple or any of the never ending cases of companies being hacked by hackers from foreign countries. It's a FEDERAL FUCKING CRIME you dumbshit! It doesn't matter one damn bit that it was the Cardinals hacking the Astros. Plain and simple, a federal crime was committed, and people go to "pound me in the fucking ass" federal prison for committing federal crimes.
I'm not the dumb ass believing the story. I know sports is entertainment therefore there is no reason for one team to hack another because no advantage is gained. If they do make up some story that someone goes to jail it will be a behind the scenes person you've never seen and you will have no idea if anything physically happened to anyone. You are calling me stupid and yet you are making a million assumptions based on faith.Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
LOL its not even close. this is the equivalent of rival sports forums hacking each other. Nobody caresQuote:
It'd be like Microsoft hacking Apple
.Quote:
Plain and simple, a federal crime was committed, and people go to "pound me in the fucking ass" federal prison for committing federal crimes
no, they go to white collar prisons for those
Jesus Tittyfucking Christ. You really are fucking delusional and off your nutjob medication. :fp:Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
And no, it is not the "equivalent of rival sports forums hacking each other". Dear god you fucking ignorant and naive. :fp:
you are still assuming anything/everything about the story is true. I just explained to you that if it never happened that your view of so called laws is pointless. You have no proof and are now wasting time discussing fiction.Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
I forgive you for your childish,insulting rant.
Expert on Descartes and epistemological certainty now?Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
I like that ram is now including the FBI as part of his delusion.
Nice touch.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Ram gets this one...Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
http://www.leelofland.com/wordpress/...Picture-52.jpg
Served that hard time
I like how you think you know something is happening because of words you read, written by establishments that are legally allowed to embellish stories.Quote:
Originally Posted by steelerfan
sure it does but was it cut or pushed or lightening ? which direction did it fall? was it just a story and it never fell ? you know nothing because you weren't there.Quote:
"If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?"
And you know nothing because:
A) you're a dumb fucking dumbfuck.
B) you weren't there either.
Also, you believe the FBI would allow a story like this, involving their name, even though it's fabricated. You are an assclown.
that didn't debate or counter anything I said. All you are saying is you believe everything you read. I just explained to you that media can make it up and its legal. FBI was involved in the so called baseball steroid scandal and nothing happened to anyone in that either.Quote:
Originally Posted by steelerfan
yep buddy, you are a true intellectual.:smh:Quote:
And you know nothing because:
A) you're a dumb fucking dumbfuck.
You said embellish. Now you say "make it up", implying false or lying statements. Those are completely different. While there are cases where the courts have upheld that ideas like "fair" or "balanced" news reporting is largely in the eye of the beholder and what one person believes is false is fairly balanced to another... the latter statement is completely false. Libel law would easily stop news outlets, especially newspapers, from knowingly printing false stories, especially of this level. And I would find it highly unlikely that the FBI would allow such a wilful violation of libel law.Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Unless, you know, everybody in the world is in this together except the general public.
Oh Donald... Trump calls out McCain and says he's not a war hero and that he prefers soldiers who were NOT captured... :smh: This coming from the guy who went to extraordinary lengths to avoid war...
Huffington PostQuote:
"He's a war hero because he was captured," Trump said during an appearance at the Family Leadership Summit in Ames, Iowa, on Saturday. "I like people who weren't captured."
"Perhaps he's a war hero, but right now he's said some very bad things about a lot of people."
McCain spent five and a half years in a North Vietnam prison where he was tortured after his Skyhawk dive bomber was shot down in 1967. President Barack Obama, who defeated McCain in the 2008 presidential race, has praised the Arizona senator as a "genuine war hero."
Trump avoided the draft with four student and one medical deferments.
While he not anywhere near my top 40 candidates I will support him versus anyone with D in front if their name.Quote:
Originally Posted by jaymo76
Really? Ugh! I have no issue or problem voting for an R if I believe that R is a better option than the D. Trump is not that R. He is an assclown.Quote:
Originally Posted by SCClassof93
Ideology Bill.....while I'm not a fan of the Gop they are far less dangerous than the dems.Quote:
Originally Posted by souljahbill
http://www.isidewith.com/political-quiz
Take the quiz. Share your results.
My results. You can email the link to yourself and post. I just used Paint to throw out my results in all their right wing glory!
http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2...from=xvTSUVdkt
http://i.imgur.com/RSUv0xm.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/QMkuCaa.jpg
I'm lining up with Walker and Paul but not nearly as intense as you guys.
Disclaimer... Canadian with a Liberal viewpoint...
[QUOTE
I side with Bernie Sanders on most 2016 Presidential Election issues
Candidates you side with...
86%
Bernie Sanders
Bernie Sanders Democrat
on domestic policy, foreign policy, economic, environmental, social, education, and healthcare issues.
compare answers
77%
Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton Democrat
on domestic policy, foreign policy, social, healthcare, and education issues.
compare answers
60%
Martin O'Malley
Martin O'Malley Democrat
on domestic policy and healthcare issues.
compare answers
57%
Rand Paul
Rand Paul Republican
on foreign policy and immigration issues.
compare answers
54%
Marco Rubio
Marco Rubio Republican
on immigration issues.
compare answers
54%
Ted Cruz
Ted Cruz Republican
on immigration issues.
compare answers
53%
Mike Huckabee
Mike Huckabee Republican
on healthcare issues.
compare answers
52%
Donald Trump
Donald Trump Republican
on healthcare issues.
compare answers
52%
Jeb Bush
Jeb Bush Republican
on social issues.
compare answers
46%
John Kasich
John Kasich Republican
on environmental and healthcare issues.
compare answers
44%
Rick Santorum
Rick Santorum Republican
on immigration issues.
compare answers
43%
Scott Walker
Scott Walker Republican
no major issues.
compare answers
41%
Chris Christie
Chris Christie Republican
on environmental and healthcare issues.
compare answers
34%
Lindsey Graham
Lindsey Graham Republican
no major issues.
compare answers
33%
Ben Carson
Ben Carson Republican
no major issues.
compare answers
13%
Carly Fiorina
Carly Fiorina Republican
no major issues.
compare answers
10%
Rick Perry
Rick Perry Republican
no major issues.
compare answers
][/QUOTE]
Okay so now my next question... who the hell is Bernie Sanders?
Wow! It's funny how similar yet different our countries are. What you would classify as left ist is what we would call centre. I am a tried and true 100% Liberal right in the middle or if anything a little to the right. However, based on US issues I am listed as a Left Wing Authoritarian. That is soooo not true!!! That bothers me just typing it!
A Democratic Socialist, his words, not mine. Basically the most liberal of all the candidates (guaranteed housing and jobs, free health care and education, universal income, climate change, taxing the rich even more, etc, etc.). Basically wants us to become Europe.Quote:
Originally Posted by jaymo76
It's okay, we can still be friends.
:fp: I feel so dirty right now! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by bdoughty
The funniest part of this is that my state's governor, Bobby Jindal, has no-showed on everybody's quiz!
He's such a loser.