thanks steelerfan.
thanks steelerfan.
Wasn't expecting you to and that doesn't bother me one bit. Not surprised you felt the need to comment like a little girl either.Originally Posted by steelerfan
Rawls is more physically ready. Hayes was only around 180lbs, but we'll see what he's at after the summer.What about Justice Hayes????
Fitz is the default guy as the most consistent in the spring, since none of the others have really stepped up.......so if Rawls is as good as some think he is, he could very quickly climb that depth chart.
could i get a sreenshot of michigans top players just like the texas and lsu ones?
thanks a lot for all the info so far
Can I get snapshots of the following from the depth chart, by position, menu?
Oregon:
QB's
WR's
CB's
Ok. Time to actually play the game for a bit, lol.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk
i think Hopkins has the most potential out of all the guys, he is a huge powerback with a quick burst, he could easily be an every down back. I remember fitzgerald getting caught a couple times with wide open field ahead of him this year.
If possible the top rated players at Rutgers?
Thank you
I guess they gave Mettenberger #11 even though thats Spencer Ware number. Also #14 is now #7 and I believe they moved Hatcher #37 to OLB.
Hopkins has potential but has to fix fumble problems that he had all spring. Cox runs too high even though he is a beast, kinda like Minor. Cox is much better athletically than people think, but can't get his head wrapped around the game for some reason....he loses focus too much.
Smith.....just not big enough for the new offense and not back to his form pre-injury.
Shaw is most explosive, but needs to put the work in this summer, something he hasn't done in the past, in order to help stay injury-free.
Fitz is still not 100% after his knee injury, but is coming along and slowly regaining burst. He's not a burner. By consistency, he's the default starter coming out of spring, but not necessarily the best RB on the team for upside once fall camp starts and season rolls along.......we'll see after the summer who worked their ass off or not.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using TapatalkNow this is some BS right here. No way T-Bob Hebert (C #53) is the best player for LSU. Spencer Ware (should be HB #11 - they gave that number to a QB), who is probably our best RB, is not even listed. I'm assuming QB #11 is Mettenberger (again this is Spencer Ware's number). CB #14 should be CB #7 (Tyrann Mathieu) and rated higher in my opinion. Poor scouting/research
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk
It's no fun playing with your favorite team online when the rosters or this jacked up. Once again I have to pause the game to try to patch together the depth chart to look somewhat similar to what it should and only have 25 seconds because the douche on the other side immediately hits resume game.
Last edited by lilheavy; 06-29-2011 at 03:31 PM.
Yea I think Smith is going to be useless in the pro style system. I'm pretty sure Shaw will get the majority of the carries with either fitzgerald or hopkins not far behind. But i see it as Hopkins.
Nah. They have to shy away from making the rosters as close to real life as they have been in the past. I suspect that that is going to be the case with pretty much all the teams after all the shit they're getting from various players about Likeness Issues and all that.Now this is some BS right here. No way T-Bob Hebert (C #53) is the best player for LSU. Spencer Ware (should be HB #11 - they gave that number to a QB), who is probably our best RB, is not even listed. I'm assuming QB #11 is Mettenberger (again this is Spencer Ware's number). CB #14 should be CB #7 (Tyrann Mathieu) and rated higher in my opinion. Poor scouting/research
if anyone has ratings for NC State QB's and RB's I'd love it
I thing this is realistic, yet still unfair:
Mich QB #16 (Denard Robinson) Spd:95 Accel:99 Agility:99 Btk:90
Ryno from Tradition Sports has the whole SEC, BIG 10 AND PAC 12 overall player ratings up as well as whatever ones come after that that will show on the screen in his video section. Just trying to make life here a little easier so we arent asking questions that are already answered.
And I dont get why everyone has so high of break tackle ratings, it leads to flawed gameplay.
They gave Donnie Evege (CB #30).. a 87 rating. He has 13 career tackles.
AND Curtis Grant (no. 2 player overall by Rivals) is a 68?!?
Last edited by Iron Dragon; 06-29-2011 at 04:22 PM.
The break tackle is not realistic at all. Weird.
One could easily argue the other ones are fine.
Yeah looking at the roster vidoes, every QB that was a very good scrambler last year in real life got break tackle rating in the low to mid 90s. Then you have way too many RBs with truck rating in the 90s. Then I seen some defensive linemen with strength in the 70s.
But far as QBs are concerned, what is the point of elusive rating if they giving QBs break tackle rating in the 90s ? Does elusiveness rating even do anything ??? You would think scramblers and agile player would rely more their elusiveness then break tackle.
I mean Barry Sanders wasn't busting through tackles, he was avoiding them with his elusiveness.
Notre Dame Ratings Please for following:
QBs
RBs
WRs
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks