Thanks for the reply. So those lofty goals will just be random and not based on whether my playbook style is geared more towards running or passing?
It would have been nice if they could have built playbook style logic into the goals but I guess not getting penalized is a good workaround.
It makes me chuckle that coaching offers have been so demanded for so long, and now people are worried about not being able to stay at the same school...haha
I wonder how realistic the ladder will be concerning job offers. Will you go from OC at a low school, to OC at a mid-level school, then to HC at a low school, then HC at a good school?
If offers use the same logic as the old games, after one/two years you get offers rolling in from powerhouses like Tenn/ND/Wisc. I'd love it to be a slow climb to the top.
This year in NCAA 12 Dynasty Mode: When you move a player from CB to FS or RB to FB or DT to RG/RT or OLB to MLB or SS to OLB how are the players ratings affected. Players change positions all the time and some time for the better so I was wondering How did that work this year in the game??
I dont understand this if you like a run heavy or a pass heavy offense i would think you would pick a lower level school to suit to suit your playbook. It will make your climb to the top a bit easier.
Look at the screenshots of the contract goals. Notice that on most goals there are a different number of red and green arrows. This shows that some goals help a lot if you succeed, and only do a little damage if you fail, or vice versa.
For example, if you were the HC at Texas, you may have a goal of winning 8 games. If you succeed, it doesn't help much. If you fail, it is devastating. Under the same contract, you could have a goal of winning 12 games. If you succeed, it's a huge boost. If you fail, it doesn't mean much.
i agree with the post and i am not picking at you but just found it hilarious that you mentioned TENNESSEE as a "powerhouse" lol sorry from TN but am die hard Ducks fan and have been for years, just funny to hear someone call UT a powerhouse with the crap they have been putting out over the past few...
sorry... carry on...
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand go
"E"
Even though they've been down for some years now, I'd still consider them a great opportunity for most coaches, for example Kiffin was a pretty big land, till' he jumped ship. As far as the attributes needed to dominate a dynasty, Tenn has great recruiting, tradition, pipelines and a conference that will allow it. I'm saying they're a school that shouldn't pick up just anybody after one good year at WKU
Last edited by Colossal28; 05-24-2011 at 12:53 PM.
Bookmarks