Page 20 of 21 FirstFirst ... 1018192021 LastLast
Results 381 to 400 of 401

Thread: Share Your Impressions of NCAA Football 11

  • Share
    • Facebook
  • Thread Tools
  • Display
  1. #381
    Freshman griffin2608's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by ram29jackson View Post
    some tuner set eh ? i'm still getting balls batted down left and right by def. linemen- whatever haha , I still like the game- last 2 years of ncaa were a joke compared to this year
    I thought that too, I just took the job with Clemson that was offered to me in my dynasty. I was playing the first game vs Ole Miss and my D was swatting down passes left and right. I was like WHF then I looked at my DT that was getting all the swats and he is 6'7" tall. I started looking at who was swatting down passes and mostly its really tall guys which is realistic.

  2. #382
    Hall of Fame ram29jackson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    10,052
    Quote Originally Posted by griffin2608 View Post
    I thought that too, I just took the job with Clemson that was offered to me in my dynasty. I was playing the first game vs Ole Miss and my D was swatting down passes left and right. I was like WHF then I looked at my DT that was getting all the swats and he is 6'7" tall. I started looking at who was swatting down passes and mostly its really tall guys which is realistic.
    theres plenty of tall lineman in college, that doesnt mean the ball gets swatted once every series.

    no, it isnt realistic.

  3. #383
    Heisman jaymo76's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,103
    Still loving this game but the DB's running the slant routes better than your receivers is getting to be a bit much. The majority of the time my recievers are covered like glue and you can't even lead the reciever because the DB is in front of him. If this issue can't be patched then my time with this game will become very limited~ at first it was a little annoying, then it became a pain in the butt, and now it's downright infuriating. Little things like this turn out to be major issues over time and it needs to be addressed ASAP.

  4. #384
    Heisman AustinWolv's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Leander, Texas
    Posts
    2,618
    Quote Originally Posted by jaymo76 View Post
    Still loving this game but the DB's running the slant routes better than your receivers is getting to be a bit much. The majority of the time my recievers are covered like glue and you can't even lead the reciever because the DB is in front of him. If this issue can't be patched then my time with this game will become very limited~ at first it was a little annoying, then it became a pain in the butt, and now it's downright infuriating. Little things like this turn out to be major issues over time and it needs to be addressed ASAP.
    What do you have the pass coverage slider set at?

  5. #385
    Booster JeffHCross's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    South County, STL
    Posts
    12,951
    Quote Originally Posted by jaymo76 View Post
    Yup... but it makes no sense whatsoever that it doesn't work. When I played football, amazingly coach could call slide block R or slide block L for run and pass. You would think it would be an easy fix but who knows???
    Yes and no. Sure, it's an "easy fix", but why would they fix something they don't consider broken? It's not designed to help the running game. Slide Protection, in NCAA, is designed for pass protection only.

    And while I'll agree that there are probably some coaches that use it ... I'd venture to guess there are a lot more that don't. Our slide protection schemes had no bearing on our run blocking, even on the rare plays that we actually used zone blocking techniques.
    Twitter: @3YardsandACloud

  6. #386
    Heisman jaymo76's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,103
    Quote Originally Posted by AustinWolv View Post
    What do you have the pass coverage slider set at?
    That's the thing... I had been playing with the cpu pass D at 40. Now I will say that my receivers are pretty avg. this year but the issue isn't the receivers it's the dbs. What do you have your D pass covg at? Sounds like you're not seeing an issue?

  7. #387
    Heisman jaymo76's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,103
    Quote Originally Posted by JeffHCross View Post
    Yes and no. Sure, it's an "easy fix", but why would they fix something they don't consider broken? It's not designed to help the running game. Slide Protection, in NCAA, is designed for pass protection only.

    And while I'll agree that there are probably some coaches that use it ... I'd venture to guess there are a lot more that don't. Our slide protection schemes had no bearing on our run blocking, even on the rare plays that we actually used zone blocking techniques.
    I am curious as to what is tougher to programme... zone blocking or manual L/R slide?

  8. #388
    Heisman AustinWolv's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Leander, Texas
    Posts
    2,618
    Quote Originally Posted by jaymo76 View Post
    That's the thing... I had been playing with the cpu pass D at 40. Now I will say that my receivers are pretty avg. this year but the issue isn't the receivers it's the dbs. What do you have your D pass covg at? Sounds like you're not seeing an issue?
    Playing on Heisman with CPU pass coverage is at 30 or 35, can't recall which right now. There is separation, but good CBs will stay with slants.....not every time though, so if it is open, it is open. If not, look elsewhere quickly. My WRs will get open on ins and outs too, but not every time.

  9. #389
    Heisman morsdraconis's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Huntington, WV -------------Michael Guthrie
    Posts
    8,305
    I lowered mine from 50 to 40 on All-American and saw a SIGNIFICANT improvement in coverage abilities. Granted, against superior talent it's still gonna be tough, but I've been pretty happy with the results against with the slider at 40. Tempted to go down to 35 to see how much more of a difference it makes.

  10. #390
    Heisman jaymo76's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,103
    Quote Originally Posted by morsdraconis View Post
    I lowered mine from 50 to 40 on All-American and saw a SIGNIFICANT improvement in coverage abilities. Granted, against superior talent it's still gonna be tough, but I've been pretty happy with the results against with the slider at 40. Tempted to go down to 35 to see how much more of a difference it makes.
    I might try 35 today if I get a chance. I have a new FIVE STAR STUD raw freshman as my starting QB so I will see how he does. Hey get this, he's giving Jamarcus Russel a run for his money: Cory Covington 6'6 275lbs. That's a big, big QB.

  11. #391
    Heisman morsdraconis's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Huntington, WV -------------Michael Guthrie
    Posts
    8,305
    Quote Originally Posted by jaymo76 View Post
    I might try 35 today if I get a chance. I have a new FIVE STAR STUD raw freshman as my starting QB so I will see how he does. Hey get this, he's giving Jamarcus Russel a run for his money: Cory Covington 6'6 275lbs. That's a big, big QB.
    Holy shit, that's a HUGE QB. Was he a QB prospect or an ATH? I've never seen a QB that freakin' big.

  12. #392
    Heisman AustinWolv's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Leander, Texas
    Posts
    2,618
    Jared Lorenzen

  13. #393
    Varsity ebin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Eugene
    Posts
    243
    Quote Originally Posted by morsdraconis View Post
    Holy shit, that's a HUGE QB. Was he a QB prospect or an ATH? I've never seen a QB that freakin' big.
    I've got a 6-7, 265lbs TE with 81 THA and 94 THP. Rates out as an 81 OVR at QB.

  14. #394
    Heisman jaymo76's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,103
    Quote Originally Posted by morsdraconis View Post
    Holy shit, that's a HUGE QB. Was he a QB prospect or an ATH? I've never seen a QB that freakin' big.
    He was the #2 ranked QB.

  15. #395
    Heisman morsdraconis's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Huntington, WV -------------Michael Guthrie
    Posts
    8,305
    I will definitely have to look more at the QB prospects. Especially since I am finally a [6star] prestige team in my offline dynasty.

  16. #396
    Heisman Rudy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Kingsville, ON
    Posts
    7,304
    I got one 5* recruit to quick commit this year. I'm going after less players but higher rated recruits. Quality over quantity this year. I've got a lot of great players in my Top 10 right now (plus two hard commits through 4 weeks) and I'm pretty much spending the full 60 minutes on each guy in my Top 10. I really hope there isn't an epic fail.

    I do notice that some of the LBs are really undersized. Some are even under 200 lbs. Do they gain weight over the years of my dynasty? That's something I never pay attention to. I'm running the 3-4 and I need bigger players at their positions.

  17. #397
    Heisman morsdraconis's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Huntington, WV -------------Michael Guthrie
    Posts
    8,305
    Quote Originally Posted by Rudy View Post
    I do notice that some of the LBs are really undersized. Some are even under 200 lbs. Do they gain weight over the years of my dynasty? That's something I never pay attention to. I'm running the 3-4 and I need bigger players at their positions.
    That's an excellent question and one I've not really noticed. I will pay more attention to progressions and such next time when I sim through a few seasons.

  18. #398
    Heisman AustinWolv's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Leander, Texas
    Posts
    2,618
    Quote Originally Posted by morsdraconis View Post
    That's an excellent question and one I've not really noticed. I will pay more attention to progressions and such next time when I sim through a few seasons.
    Pretty sure they did at the end of last-gen. I damn can't recall if they do in this/next-gen.

  19. #399
    Heisman morsdraconis's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Huntington, WV -------------Michael Guthrie
    Posts
    8,305
    Quote Originally Posted by AustinWolv View Post
    Pretty sure they did at the end of last-gen. I damn can't recall if they do in this/next-gen.
    '10, they definitely gained weight but I never actually looked for this year to see if they did or not.

  20. #400
    Booster JeffHCross's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    South County, STL
    Posts
    12,951
    Quote Originally Posted by jaymo76 View Post
    I am curious as to what is tougher to programme... zone blocking or manual L/R slide?
    I would presume zone blocking. Zone blocking requires artificial intelligence to be programmed to determine who to block on a given play. Of course, we see the results of that this year with the blocking AI (which is particularly interesting to watch on Zone blocking plays). Manual L/R slide requires no intelligence, just a direction to go/follow.

    Again, I think this goes back to fundamental design. I don't believe they intend for slide protection to do anything on running plays. So it's not "broken", and I don't really think it's something they play to do either. You never know, but I wouldn't think so.
    Twitter: @3YardsandACloud

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •