I hate to break up the party, but I must defend the president. Last night was clearly a severe case of altitude sickness as this video clearly demonstrates.
I hate to break up the party, but I must defend the president. Last night was clearly a severe case of altitude sickness as this video clearly demonstrates.
You are going to laugh but there is one liberal able to take something from the debate and embarrassingly try to make it racist, the goes on to actually making a racist statement himself. It is like liberals can't comprehend irony.Originally Posted by CLW
Next Dem excuse: Debates are RACIST!!!
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2012/10/hbc-90008926
Yet there he was, giving a presentation devoid of substance, vision, principle, or even basic coherence. He didn’t show a spark of anger, even when Romney slyly found a way to call him a boy, comparing Obama’s statements to the sorts of childish lies his “five boys” used to tell.
How the right’s hard-core racists must have howled at that! Mitt, at long last, has secured his base.
A Teleprompter, a teleprompter, My kingdom for a teleprompter!
Because the debates really swing the voting...
Actually they do even according to liberal "experts" (average 2.4% bounce)Because the debates really swing the voting...
Ohio man tells Obama that his business has been "Terrible since you got here"
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/...re_653769.html
New Hampshire Resident: "Obama couldn't run a lemonade stand"
http://connecticut.cbslocal.com/2012...emonade-stand/
Thin Air + Romney having handkerchief = RACIST!!!!
http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/...chief-campaign
On the flip side the 7.8% unemployment rate is going to really help Obama. Most were speculating 8.1 to 8.2.
This ends my journey into political discussion at TGT. Nobody is going to change their mind based on anything here. Politics and religion are far to personal to be discussed on message boards with a bunch of people you have never met in real life.
Last edited by bdoughty; 10-05-2012 at 04:55 PM.
That's one thing I can agree on.
I'm pretty sure we all have our minds made up on who we're voting for, we're not going to sway anyone, all that's going to happen is the potential for a fireball to light up if one person says something that incites others and before you know, warnings and bans are getting launched. These threads just end up being nothing more than the same regurgitated rhectoric that we see on TV ads and news reports from rallies every single day.
And agreed about politics and religion. It's that very reason I was so happy to see political and religion threads not popping up in the past, and a bit disappointed to see these threads pop up a couple months ago. There's pretty much not ever a point in talking politics and religion, especially online. Everyone has their own beliefs, and unless you are one undecisive motherfucker, you're set in your beliefs, so what's the point? No one's mind is going to be changed or swayed. All that's gonna happen is something will eventually, inevitably be said, someone will get pissed off, and shit will go down.
I've broken my own rule of never discuss politics or religion, whether it's with strangers, family, my girlfriend, my girlfriend's family, no one, on here a number of times, but like you, I'm going to be ending my entry into political discussion on here. If others want to keep posting the rhetoric and pointlessly debating on here, more power to them, but I'm going to go back to what I used to do, just ignore these threads and when I'm done reading the other threads in the forum, make the OT forum as read and go about my business.
I have seen plenty of forums able to discuss politics and religion in a serious manner. While there are always bad seeds that ruin any truly serious/personal discussion, it is possible. But I will agree that it hasn't turned out very well here ... (though, as I said on the first page, this is a "propaganda" thread, not intended for actual serious discussion
According to things I've seen, only twice, including 1960, has the leader going into the debates not been the eventual victor. One of those was, of course, 1960. The other was Carter/Reagan, if memory serves. Bush/Gore changed, but was within the margin for error so I guess it didn't countA 2.4% change doesn't mean anything if the result doesn't change.
Last edited by JeffHCross; 10-06-2012 at 02:37 PM.
Twitter: @3YardsandACloud
Carter/Reagan is a perfect analogy. Economy sucks; Iran hostage crisis/Libya coverup; etc....I have seen plenty of forums able to discuss politics and religion in a serious manner. While there are always bad seeds that ruin any truly serious/personal discussion, it is possible. But I will agree that it hasn't turned out very well here ... (though, as I said on the first page, this is a "propaganda" thread, not intended for actual serious discussion
According to things I've seen, only twice, including 1960, has the leader going into the debates not been the eventual victor. One of those was, of course, 1960. The other was Carter/Reagan, if memory serves. Bush/Gore changed, but was within the margin for error so I guess it didn't count
Look who is in the lead now:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/...-colorado-nat/
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/nationa...4og9oJa7uBFwzK
Mmmmh Mmmh Mmmh BHO!
BasicallyThat's one thing I can agree on.
I'm pretty sure we all have our minds made up on who we're voting for, we're not going to sway anyone, all that's going to happen is the potential for a fireball to light up if one person says something that incites others and before you know, warnings and bans are getting launched. These threads just end up being nothing more than the same regurgitated rhectoric that we see on TV ads and news reports from rallies every single day.
And agreed about politics and religion. It's that very reason I was so happy to see political and religion threads not popping up in the past, and a bit disappointed to see these threads pop up a couple months ago. There's pretty much not ever a point in talking politics and religion, especially online. Everyone has their own beliefs, and unless you are one undecisive motherfucker, you're set in your beliefs, so what's the point? No one's mind is going to be changed or swayed. All that's gonna happen is something will eventually, inevitably be said, someone will get pissed off, and shit will go down.
I've broken my own rule of never discuss politics or religion, whether it's with strangers, family, my girlfriend, my girlfriend's family, no one, on here a number of times, but like you, I'm going to be ending my entry into political discussion on here. If others want to keep posting the rhetoric and pointlessly debating on here, more power to them, but I'm going to go back to what I used to do, just ignore these threads and when I'm done reading the other threads in the forum, make the OT forum as read and go about my business.
Besides has anyone ever been happy from beginning to end of a President's end term?
Can't be certain but even Republicans were likely ready for Bush to leave...well maybe not the wealthy.
Damn you guys, just keep reeling me in.
My issue with politics in this country, my viewpoint, is simple. This country is fucked regardless. The issues this country is facing takes more than 4 years to fix, it takes more than 8 years to fix, especially long-term. But people in this country want IMMEDIATE results, that just will not happen, regardless of who is in office, so we sit here jumping back and forth, back and forth, random people who keep changing directions or repealing or replacing decisions made by previous administrations because they have a better (though usually not better in the end) plans that just lead us endlessly around in circles.
And while there is plenty the president can do, ultimately, it's Congress that's fucking us. Congress refuses to work together. It could be something will benefit every single American in some way, shape or form, but if it means Democrats working with Republicans and Republicans working with Democrats, it will never happen because heaven forbid the two sides work together to better life in America if it means the other side gaining some political points from it. But our problem? We keep voting the same fucking idiots back into office. And this is for both sides. Democrats keep voting some of the same people who refuse to work with the other side into Congress, and Republicans do as well. Nothing in this country is going to get better until both sides of the aisle work together, until Congress and the White House work together, regardless of what party is in control, regardless of who is in the White House.
That is something I'm sure we can all agree on. And that is the reason why I am starting to not even give a shit anymore when it comes to politics. It's all the same deceptive, round and round bullshit year after year. A politician is going to lie to get elected, it's inevitable. Obama has and will tell lies. Romney has and will tell lies. There's this kid Mandel, a republican here in Ohio running for Senate. He ran for state Treasurer office back in 2010, promising that he would work and serve the full four years of the term, and yet only a year into the term, he had already broken that promise by immediately turning around and running for senate. There's a three-seat commission that he chairs here in the state, he skipped 14 straight meetings, never going to one until he finally attended his first meeting earlier this year, only after it had been picked up by and reported on statewide by newspapers. Why should I trust him with my vote and trust him to do the best for Ohio and myself when he couldn't even keep a simple campaign promise to serve the full four year term as state Treasurer? I voted for him as Treasurer two years ago, because I thought maybe he really would be the new blood that we need in state office here in Ohio, but since then he has turned out to be nothing more than the same old tired shit of politicians simply looking out for themselves. He promises if he's elected to the Senate, that he will ONLY run for max of two terms, be in office for 12 years. Why should I also believe that?
Every politician lies, every politician cheats, every politician tells you what you want to hear, but then doesn't do it. I'm getting tired of it, from both Democrats and Republicans, and much longer of this same old tired bullshit, and I'm just not going to care anymore when it comes to politics and elections. Leo McGarry said it best in the show The West Wing,
Bartlet: "Why are you doing this? You're a player. You're bigger in the party than I am. Hoynes would probably make you National Chairman. Leo, tell me this isn't one of the twelve steps."
Leo: "That's what it is. Right after admitting that we are powerless over alcohol and a higher power can restore us to sanity. That's where you come in."
Bartlet: "Leo..."
Leo: "Because I'm tired of it! Year, after year, after year of having to choose between the lesser of who cares? Of trying to get myself excited over a candidate who can speak in complete sentences. Of setting the bar so low, I can hardly look at it. They say a good man can't get elected president. I don't believe that, do you?"
That's the point I am just about at. I'm tired of it. I was excited when I turned 18 and could actually start voting and taking part in elections and whatnot. Boy how naive I was. It's turns out all this is nothing but shit, choosing between the lesser of two evils instead of choosing the better of two good candidates, lowering my bar from election to election to decide who I can stomach voting for more over the other. I'm not voting for the best candidate or the person who is going to do the best job running the country. No, I'm voting for who isn't going to fuck up the country worse than the other guy. And this is at all levels. City, county, state, federal. I don't vote party lines, I vote by person. I routinely vote for both republicans and democrats in the same election, especially on the local city and county levels.
This election, yes, I voted Obama back in 2008. This election, I would probably vote Obama by default, just because I trust Romney less. But I don't particularly care for either candidate. Obama has had some fuck ups while in office and he has not done enough of what he said he would in 2008. Yet Romney promises the world but refuses to give details. He wants to have across the board tax cuts while increasing military spending, that the numbers I saw, was something like $5 trillion in costs. I'd love to hear where the fuck he plans to get $5 trillion to pay for those cuts and the military spending and not have any increase in the deficit. Cutting PBS and Big Bird is a piss drop in the bucket to paying for that, so what else is getting chopped? He wants my votes, I want specific details. He wants me to vote him for president and support him, I damn well deserve specific as fuck details about what he is going to do to pay for some of this of stuff. Ryan was questioned about, I want to believe it was the tax plans, he said it would take too long to explain the math behind it. When you're talking about something major like that, I don't give a fuck how long it's going to take, start talking about the fucking math. They want me to trust them and vote for them, but all it is so far are smoke and mirrors and claims of doing this and that if they are elected and yet has been repeatedly said aren't mathematically possible.
Give me specifics for how you are going to do this and that. Give me the details, TAKE THE TIME to explain all of it. Then maybe I'll consider voting for you. Instead, I have to lower my bar and pick between the lesser of two evils. I've only been voting for 8 years, and I'm already fucking tired of the bullshit. I'm quickly approaching the point of not giving a fuck anymore. It makes me sad to say that, but it's true. This election is no different, the midterms will be no different, 2016 will be no different.
I couldn't help but notice the applicability of your quote to other professions. So, fixed.
If either candidate announced tomorrow that they were going to name Michelle Rhee as Secretary of Education, I'd vote for them. Why? Because while her time in DC may have been filled with controversy, she's the only public figure I've personally heard with an explanation for what is wrong with our current education system. Plenty have said there are problems, but few have offered specifics or solutions. And Michelle Rhee is just an example. I want solutions, not clairvoyant claims about how their plan will magically create X number of jobs.
If either candidate announced tomorrow that _____ was their plan to work with Congress, and it didn't include the words "reach across the aisle", "bipartisan", "united", or any other buzzword related to working with the other party, I'd vote for them. Because the simple fact is that it doesn't matter who's in the Oval Office. The only way a Democrat is going to get things done is with a Democratic Congress. The only way a Republican is going to get things done is with a Republican Congress. Because the other party is more concerned with sandbagging the opposition than it is with running the damn country (though I will admit that Republicans in Congress are MUCH better at this goal than Democrats are ... Democrats can't even unite with themselves well).
Because he's clearly ambitious enough that within 12 years he'll be running for some other job.
Last edited by JeffHCross; 10-07-2012 at 09:08 PM.
Twitter: @3YardsandACloud
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks