[QUOTE=JeffHCross;125678]He'd have to do a lot worse to be kicked out of NE with what he brings to the field.
well, if Belichick doesnt like prima donnas, goofballs cant be too far down the list. Its after the stressful season,he's just a kid having fun. But who knows ? LOL
Originally Posted by JeffHCross
Dumb bitch.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk
LOL thats right...defense does not win championships.
the Giants gave up more points than they scored during the season. Basically during the playoffs,its about match-ups.
dont get me wrong, I think its kind of a negative/disgusting stat. But a team that was considered lacking in defense beat SF who's all about D, and beat an offensive juggernaut in the Pat's.
Go figure...?
and the Pats havent won a SB since Vinatieri left...i'm pretty sure he wasnt in the first SB with the Giants? too lazy to look up right now
Correction: the Patriots haven't won the Super Bowl since they were caught cheating and the NFL hid the evidence, by pretending they lost the tapes, to avoid the biggest backlash in American sports history.and the Pats havent won a SB since Vinatieri left
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk
That Patriots were leading with 3 or so minutes left in the game....who failed to do their job and win the game?LOL thats right...defense does not win championships.
the Giants gave up more points than they scored during the season. Basically during the playoffs,its about match-ups.
dont get me wrong, I think its kind of a negative/disgusting stat. But a team that was considered lacking in defense beat SF who's all about D, and beat an offensive juggernaut in the Pat's.
Go figure...?
and the Pats havent won a SB since Vinatieri left
And who's Defense held one of the best offenses in the game to a mere 17 points?
but thats why i bring it up..it obviously became about match ups because both teams were statistically poor in defensive categories. I wasnt surprised by the Giants winning on the last drive, The Pats defense failed to do theyre job because they failed all year,lucky to have a better then decent offense to make up for it. I'm willing to accept the pro game as is, but parity is still a weaker quality of play and being a great passing team doesnt even mean you may be that good a team thanks to the new passing rules.
were the Pats really the best offense all year ? the Siants and pack proved that getting alot of passing yards and winning games means nothing.....And who's Defense held one of the best offenses in the game to a mere 17 points?
Adam V. has 45 post season field goals on his resume....
They didn't have to be the best..but wasn't their offense not in the top 5 in scoring or yards? I don't know but I'd guess they were.
And yes the Packers and Saints were great offensively...see where they got them both though. They could score all the points you needed but their defenses couldn't stop a nose bleed.
The Patriots were 3rd in the league in scoring at 32.1 PPG.
http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorysta...true&Submit=Go
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk
Their defense didn't get them to the playoffs, but it sure as hell got them through the playoffs.
As steeler said, the Pats O was top 5 ... and their defense was dead last going into the playoffs.
Twitter: @3YardsandACloud
Thought so....in a game where they needed their defense to win the SB..they failed.
which I expected to begin with
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks