Not to mention the BIG 12 -2, -1, +1, -1?Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
Not to mention the BIG 12 -2, -1, +1, -1?
Maybe it's time to just create divisions based on geography for all 120 teams... this is getting ridiculous now...
Is there a master list of the teams that are switching, set in stone somewhere?
I'm almost to the end of the season in my OD and I'd like realign conferences for next season.
I know there are a bunch of rumors but I'm not 100% sure who is going and who isn't. I know A&M is going to the SEC for sure and TCU to the Big 12, but other than that I just hear rumors.
Any suggetions/help?
This is what I've used...
http://collegesportsinfo.com/confere...lignment-grid/
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk
Thank you sir.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk
http://espn.go.com/college-sports/st...hurdles-remain
Goodbye Missouri
Yay!
Just like Colorado, a move for more stability > competing for a conference title.
Fixed it for you.
That goes hand in hand
Actually reading through that story just now, and reading the story currently on ESPN about the Big East approaching BYU about membership, Boise State isn't going anywhere anytime soon. If the Big East wants Boise State, they have a shit ton of work ahead of them. Boise State will only join the Big East if there is a West Division to cut down on travel. So the Big East had better get their shit in order with BYU, SMU, Houston, Air Force, and someone else out west before they'll be able to get Boise State to join.
The Big East is on the verge of completing expansion plans that will see Boise State and San Diego State added for football only and SMU, Central Florida and Houston joining as all-sports members, possibly by the end of this week, according to two leading college officials.
The goal is to get those schools added in time for the 2013 season, with Air Force and Navy expected to join later.
Link
San Diego State in the Big East? What. The. Fuck.
at this point, all of these moves are just completely stupid. they should just remove all of the conferences and let let everyone battle it out.
Maybe now EAST is interpretted as "east of the Pacific Ocean...???..."
Close to the Far East?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk
I don't follow the East/West talk either. They were saying A&M would join the SEC EAST, seems like we would be more "West" than any other SEC team...
However, when looking at the SEC teams it seem they are mostly on the East of the USA, so it seems like they should be more North/South than East/West.
Well, yes. The SouthEastern conference is generally going to be in the East of the USA.However, when looking at the SEC teams it seem they are mostly on the East of the USA, so it seems like they should be more North/South than East/West.
And the West/East distinction a geographical split within the southeast. Until A&M and Missouri joined, it worked pretty well. If you ignore that Nashville is technically west of Auburn, then the easternmost six teams are in the East, with the westernmost six teams are in the West. But unless you move a team from the West to the East (and upsetting all of those current rivalries), the "easy" thing to do is, inexplicably, put either Missouri or A&M in the East. Otherwise you're faced with the same type of decision the B1G Ten has last year with splitting Michigan-Ohio State -- how would the SEC fanbases react to splitting up Auburn and Alabama?
Twitter: @3YardsandACloud
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks