Quote Originally Posted by psuexv View Post
What? So if I have 3 LTs and 2 RTs on my team and I recruit 2 Ts but they come in as LTs, that's lack of planning on my part?
I may have misunderstood you. I was thinking that you were saying that the depth chart-like interface for Position Changes didn't show you enough of the guys at other positions. I always know where I need to move guys to going into the offseason, so I never have that problem.

Little hint though (going off memory, so I may be slightly wrong) ... if you've offered a player a promise, then you can go through your "My Promises" and it will show his position, even to the detail of showing a LT or RT, before he signs.
Quote Originally Posted by psuexv View Post
most WR you look to move to DB come in as 40s
Yeah, I moved a 40 AWR guy once, he ended up at like 26 AWR. Never recovered from that and was permanently on the bench.
Quote Originally Posted by psuexv View Post
The people that are going to abuse it are going to abuse it no matter what. They do it in the offseason now so it's really no different.
Actually, it is different. What I meant is that you'd have to guard against some guy getting an advantage out of changing positions weekly. If changing the positions still incurred a AWR hit, then you probably have built-in protection against abuse. There'd just have to be sanity checking to make sure a player couldn't gain something from repeated switches.