Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Funny how you say that since you're the one believing a conspiracy and only see what you want instead of what's actually happening.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Funny how you say that since you're the one believing a conspiracy and only see what you want instead of what's actually happening.
Looks like dipshit can't even back up his own talk. How you enjoying the smell of my ass douchecanoe?Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
http://i766.photobucket.com/albums/x...psnw6n514d.png
So Smooth, he's only "guessed" correctly more times than you in two of the 8 weeks. hmmmm...... interesting.
Yep! Yet he's right, the league is fixed. We're all drooling masses while he's got some massive level of intelligence. Yet, he's only managed to barely beat me in 2 out of 8 weeks head to head. Yet all we hear about is how great his picks have been. Funny, I don't see where he went 15-1 in in a single week. I was one game short of being 100% perfect in week 3. Best he could do was 13, which was only the 4th best score in the entire group that week. :eyeroll:Quote:
Originally Posted by psuexv
Guessed correctly? There's no such thing. I've made decisions based on what I think they want to happen and I've been right more than twice. You are the ones guessing because you think outcomes are random chance.
Again....I don't have to pick right to know deception is involved.Thats the whole point of deception.
It's still amazing to me that you are so immature you think last minute finishes are supposed to be common place. You are easily deceived because you don't even know what reality is anymore.
Guessing? I know what teams you'll pick week after week and if 8 pick like you I want lose any ground. You believe the chant "anything g can happen". If that were true you couldn't get 60 to 70 % of your picks right every week or all year and most everyone does. If I actually didn't know any thing or was guessing, 8d be 10 or more behind everyone.
"Mr. Jackson, what you just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response, were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
That might just be the most rambling incoherent response yet. :ram: :ram?:Quote:
Originally Posted by psuexv
I know, it's freakin hilarious. The whole thing is filled with winsQuote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
I mean just these two statements alone "You are the ones guessing because you think outcomes are random chance" "If I actually didn't know any thing or was guessing, 8d be 10 or more behind everyone." So he's saying he's a bad guesser???? Last time I check guessing was a 50/50 thing so if everyone is guessing they should all be right around each other.
And then there is this one "Again....I don't have to pick right to know deception is involved.Thats the whole point of deception." Wrong again!!!! This statement would be correct if the masses were getting the picks wrong since we are the ones being deceived. However, you've stated multiple times that you know it's fixed so that gives you an advantage on the deception because you claim you are not deceived. And if you are not deceived then getting picks wrong absolutely proves a point.
The definition of guessing isQuote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
To arrive at or commit oneself to an opinion about something without having sufficient evidence to support the opinion fully.
So, because you don't have any evidence to support the basis for your picks, other than your opinion that the games are fixed, your picks are nothing more than guesses. You can call them intelligent guesses, whatever, but if they're not guesses, then you should never get another pick wrong. Because that won't happen, your guesses are no better than anyone else's.
Thank you NFL for another exciting, thrilling prime time NFL game for us drooling masses! :up:
You mean this one wasn't scripted for the Golden Boy Johnny Football to win?Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Anyone care to admit how suspicious that ball spot with the marker was in the game?
In a game that was never close?
He can't claim shit about the game being fixed because it was a blowout, so now it's on to ball spots as proof the game was fixed. :D
Yeah because CLEARLY ball spots = 21 points easily.Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
Out of anyone here, ram would be the one to know about ball spots.Quote:
Originally Posted by JBHuskers
On his chin maybe.Quote:
Originally Posted by baseballplyrmvp
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Here you go Ram, some fixed ball spots for you.
For the most part NSFW
Spoiler: show
Jaguars ,Vikings,Steelers:
So,in order to win a game in the NFL your best players and starters,and QBS have to injured or out of the game.
Saints: they can beat fully functional teams with their last place defense but can't win at home against a team with a rookie QB and a coaching change in the middle of the week.
But you'll defend this unrealistic trash instead of waking up.
How convenient, Manning will break the record at home next week.
Lol its the nfl that has your attention because you refuse to think for yourself. They took your blissful ignorance and threw it right back in your face today like a clown with a cream pieQuote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/11...79e90f1498.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Those dinky injuries. Are they real or just for commercial breaks?
Another game coming down to the wire in prime time...but yeah,that's just normal. ...Who needs a starting QB when all these back ups are destroying the league?
Yep, another prime time nailbiter, just like that Browns-Bengals game Thursday night. Total nailbiter!
Of course you completely ignore that blowout of a prime time game. Well, other than trying to claim that ball spots are now rigged. :eyeroll:
Here's a suspicious ball spot. I think it might just be intentional!
http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/11...33256db89a.jpg
This makes no sense. In actually the NFL has your attention even more with these idiotic ideas, especially the prime time one where a lot of the games this season have not been close.Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
College: So Bama lost to Ole Miss who lost to Memphis who got crushed by Navy...?
yes I picked Florida State and they lost but the objective was still met. They wanted to make Clemson look weaker and move them out of the top 4. Alabama moves up and ND moves in simply because that attracts more interest
*Waits for Clemson to remain #1*Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
So Clemson looks weaker because they beat a pretty good Florida State team? And Clemson is likely to be still #1 or at the very worst #2 (safely well above whoever is #3) in the next CFP rankings tomorrow? And Ole Miss losing to Memphis who got manhandled by Navy apparently makes Alabama (who lost to Ole Miss) look better? And Alabama beating LSU has nothing to do it with it. Yeah, that makes sense. :fp: :ram:
http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/11...81bc7b5dad.jpg
I don't even know what the hell Clemson has to do with all of this. Notre Dame moves into the Top 4 solely on the basis of LSU (last week's #2) losing to Alabama. What the fuck does trying to make Clemson appear weak (despite beating a good, high ranked Florida State team) have to do with anything?
makes no sense? i pointed out that they gave a majority of unrealistic winning teams this week. Theres no way in heck SF should have won. They had too many games this week of teams with back up QBs and injured players winning and keeping games close. Pure WWE crap and you still buy it.Quote:
Originally Posted by JBHuskers
you are in denial to not believe more games come down to the last 2 minutes than should. Also an unrealistic amount of overtime games.
So how many games per week should be close? What's a "realistic" amount?Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
We were talking PRIMETIME games, and you change the subject to games that we weren't even talking about :DQuote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
That's all he does is deflect and change the subject with every single post.Quote:
Originally Posted by JBHuskers
I love how because teams win with backup QBs it can't be real. These guys are in the NFL for a reason, they aren't talentless twits coming off the street. They are still some of the top best 50 QBs around. And one particular game that you point out was the Steelers game. Obviously you didn't watch the game because the backup QB had nothing to do with them winning. They had a nice lead when Ben went out and Jones did nothing to extend that lead after he came in. He hit one pass that matter and Brown was wide open, once again a throw that any QB in the NFL, starter or 2nd string should be able to make.
Which is why nobody believes the utter shit that he types.Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
I still don't understand how Clemson looks weaker? They beat at top 25 team by 10. Will Bama move up to #1, maybe. But it's because they beat the #2 team.
Nevermind.... I found proof that this week made Clemson look weaker.
AP Top 25 poll: Clemson overtakes Ohio State for No. 1 spot
Oh wait.... no it doesn't. It's PROOF that they don't appear weaker.