The funny thing is that, really, I don't have a problem being someone other than Ohio State (except Michigan), nor do I have a problem, conceptually, with someone else using Ohio State. I just can't play
versus Ohio State.
So, actually, if we went the direction of the Big Ten dynasty, I'd be willing to consider a bottom feeder if we swapped Ohio State out of the conference
. I.e Notre Dame.
Hypothetically speaking, of course.
Though, to keep this discussion about multiple ideas, I do want to touch on the Independents idea. The reason I was so interested in it a few years ago is that we had an experience in another OD where some users were averse to playing too many Users games, while others didn't want to play the CPU -- ever. An Independents league is the only time you're allowed full control over your schedule. Obviously, that could be extremely stressful/annoying for the Commish in the pre-season, which is why I thought I'd be the only one crazy enough to consider it. But I think with some ground rules (i.e. you can only request X different games if they're CPU games), it could be rather fun. No one's "required" to play user games, so it's completely up to the users themselves and how they want to play. Very easy to have home-and-home or annual series that way too.
In fact, speaking of, I think that would be a good fit for another idea I had ... where you have a thread where people make "contracts" for annual series, home-and-homes, or even three-game series. You could even do it with CPU teams in theory. Among other things, that would make it tons easier for people to remember what they've agreed to
Bookmarks