Other than the fact that I'd much rather be playing Papa every year than you, I'm fine with it. Whether he runs with Texas or Iowa, there's not a significant difference between the two.Originally Posted by Oneback
Either way, I'm going to take my lumps.
Twitter: @3YardsandACloud
haha texas in the state of texas, your doing it wrong oneback.
jk i dont care and just want everyone to be happy with their team! (and to start soon)
I think it's a fair compensation for being strong-armed out of Ann Arbor ;-)
Indiana, same team I was going to replace for Nebraska.Peer Pressure. But I don't mind the move. Who would you replace for Texas?
I don't know, you haven't seen my record this year (not good) online.
Now there is another alternative, I guess I was thinking about this in my sleep. Since myself, Jeff and PSU want to play with Big 10 teams, FSU with an ACC team and Papa with a Big 12 team to make it fair for everyone else if we want to change this to a Big 10/Big 12/ACC OD I am cool with that as well. The only thing that I would ask is that there are at least 4 user controlled teams per conference (In the big 12 and ACC it would either need to be 2 per division or all 4 in one).
Any thoughts on that from everyone?
I know everyone has been practicing with their teams and may not want to change at this point but I atleast wanted to throw out the alternative so everyone can have more of a "powerhouse" team.
I agree. Everytime I looked at the Nebraska roster and figured out everything that needed to be changed and then looked at the Michigan roster and thought it would be nice to have that I texted Papa. Only because Papa wanted to change them back from a spread team to a power run team, so I figured I would make both of our jobs easier.
Im fine with the big 10/acc/big 12. if we do that I would like to take the U
Fine with me as well. Most important thing is for everyone to be happy with their teams.
Well in that case. I'm thinking of taking my services to Hokie-land..but I have grown to like the Sun Devils. Hmm I'll have to see what everyone else does.
Last edited by skipwondah33; 07-20-2010 at 07:34 AM.
I agree and part of that comes with everyone having equal teams. Not saying Escobar couldn't over come it but having Minnesota in a conference that includes Ohio State, Penn State, FSU, Texas and Michigan puts him at a big disadvantage.
Oh no.. no Quizz Rodgers??
Oh well. Here's my new considerations:
1. TCU (replace Colorado?).. the only thing that scares me is that they lose 9 starters on offense after '10, and then 7 on defense, along with 5 overall in the secondary.
2. Oklahoma
3. West Virginia (replace Duke?)
4. Virginia Tech
5. Wisconsin (if now available)
It's still up to everyone on if they want to change the format. Are you on board with switching to a new conference?Oh no.. no Quizz Rodgers??
Oh well. Here's my new considerations:
1. TCU (replace Colorado?).. the only thing that scares me is that they lose 9 starters on offense after '10, and then 7 on defense, along with 5 overall in the secondary.
2. Oklahoma
3. West Virginia (replace Duke?)
4. Virginia Tech
5. Wisconsin (if now available)
I'll put you down as the first to stake a claim on Oklahoma as I am leaning toward keeping the conferences in line. Skip already staked Va Tech.
I'm good with the new conferences. I'll have to take a look at which team I may want but honestly I felt a bit dirty using USC since they were pretty much pre-built.
So, with that said, the Big 10 is full (plus one), correct?
Here is what I have so far:
Big 10
1. JeffHCross - Ohio State
2. psusnoop - Penn State
3. Oneback - Michigan
4.
Big 12
North
1. gschwendt - Nebraska
2.
South
1. Papa Lonestar - Texas
2. Iron Dragon - Oklahoma
ACC
Atlantic
1. fsuprime - FSU
2.
Costal
2. texacotea - Miami
3. skipwondah33 - Va Tech
Waiting on a team:
xGRIDIRONxGURUx
Kingpin32
Escobar
Last edited by Oneback; 07-20-2010 at 09:58 AM.
I'm good with the Sooners. I've looked over their roster and they have quite a bit to build on. They were one of the teams I needed to update in my roster anyways since I got suggestions and notes handed to me about them.
I'll go with Boston College.
Actually, give me Nebraska if you don't mind.
Done
In order to get a third or fouth team to be in the same conference with Texas and OU....I would like to suggest moving Texas, Texas A&M, Oklahoma, and Oklahoma State into the Pac-10 in place of Washington, Washington State, Arizona, and Arizona State.
That way teams like USC and Oregon are available to match the talent and prestige....and maybe moving FSU to the SEC will open up other talents (except Alabama please....lol)....that way we have the national title game (possibly), Rose Bowl, Cotton Bowl, etc. as possible user vs user bowl matchups. Just a thought :-)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks