Printable View
Courtesy Tradition Sports
http://forums.traditionsportsonline....ratings.78725/
Spoiler: show
Preliminary Top 25 via video from Tradition Sports
1. Alabama
2. USC
3. LSU
4. Oregon
5. Oklahoma
6. Georgia
7. Arkansas
8. Florida State
9. Michigan
10. West Virginia
11. South Carolina
12. Michigan State
13. Kansas State
14. Clemson
15. Virginia Tech
16. Wisconsin
17. TCU
18. Ohio State
19. Nebraska
20. Stanford
21. Boise State
22. Texas
23. Oklahoma State
24. Notre Dame
25. Florida
How the fuck is WVU's offense rated BELOW their defense? Are these guys watching WVU circa 1999 or some shit?
Who does Wisconsin have back that they get a 99 offense?
Florida a 91 on offense? LOL, do they know something I don't? I hope. :D
Ball, that's about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by oweb26
I can't believe Notre Dame is a 97 :dunno:
Holy fucking overeager EA ratings team batman!
Clemson 97-96-91? 97-92-95 for Florida State? 97 for Georgia on offense? Texas 99-91-99? Wisconsin 99-97-95? Ugh, 99 offense for Oregon, along with 94-95 Defense-Special Teams and USC with 99-99 offense/defense and 91 special teams, I wonder who will be the popular teams online (*cough* LSU/Oregon/USC *cough*).
Looking at it, 32 teams with 90+ Offense scores. :fp:
Hard to believe that LSU's offense is a 99 and the defense is only a 92
These team ratings are ATROCIOUS.
EVERYONE is overrated and it's retarded.
Yeah they are pretty bad even on EA's standard. Glad I play dynasty we will be through season one in about a week once the game drops.
Yep, not sure what went in to the thinking there.Quote:
Originally Posted by psuexv
LOL, Umass doesn't have any prestige?
I'm sure they're a 1-star.Quote:
Originally Posted by psuexv
Even as a UW homer, a 92 DEF rating is WAY too high. Last season was an atrocity on that side of the ball for us. Resulting in basically the entire D staff getting the boot, and a whole new scheme being brought in.
I'm good with the OFF being a 93, though. Keith Price should be able to continue what he started last year.
I agree, just kind of funny seeing it blankQuote:
Originally Posted by gschwendt
I just looked at these ratings....something HAS to be jacked up here.
Yeah they're pretty unrealistic, IMOQuote:
Originally Posted by JBHuskers
The FSU ratings should be flipped. A 97 D I could buy. But a 97 O? No way. Our o-line is all band-aids and mashed potatoes. And I'm not sold on EJ. It should be a 92 at best, 90 at worst. Miami is a 6 star program according to this, while we are a 5. Wondering what that separation is based on. Not recent history. One more Cane hired to the Dev staff to tip the balance in their favor over theQuote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
FSU devs? Joking, but really scratching my head over that.
I feel like this is a problem with the rosters as a whole. It's been discussed many places that there needs to be a much larger spread in ratings ... too many individual ratings in the 90+ range.Quote:
Originally Posted by morsdraconis
It's something you can fix in a roster, but becomes nearly impossible to maintain throughout a dynasty.
Yeah this isn't right.
No way Texas would be rated 99 on offense.
The way it's computing on whatever E3 build they have out there is incorrect. Has to be.
To me, LSU's ratings are the givaway here... no way their O is better than their D.
I'm hoping it's just an error. Hopefully they can get them tuned and adjusted before release.
Sent off an email to see if I can verify these ratings.
Kwizzy, any way you can ask about this possible bug as well?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwizzy
While in Nickle and Dime, when you choose "4 DEs" in the sub packages it puts 11 offensive players on the field (or at least it did for me in LSU vs. Bama). The player numbers on the play call screen will be normal but when you return to the field it's all offensive players on defense.
Looks like that info is a little wrong. The columns are mixed up. The first Column is actually the OVR team rating and not offense. The second column is the Offense, and it doesn’t look like the defense column is on there.
This is what we have for LSU
OVR – 99
Off – 92
Def – 95
Even with that new information, in what world does 92 Offense and 95 Defense equal 99 OVR? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Kwizzy
Nevermind, got to em on twitter.
Yeah, Alabama has the same 92 OFF and 95 DEF, and they come out to a 97. Maybe it's something to do with "star" players putting LSU over the top.
Your bug has been passed on, if you get any more specifics just PM em to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Geauxlden
You can't see Alabama's DEF rating, it's not in the chart. Their chart shows OVR, OFF, ST.Quote:
Originally Posted by JSmith03
First column is Overall, 2nd is Offense, Defense is not listed... so 99 OVR -99 Off - 92, Def - unknown.Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
I know that. I was commenting on what Kwizzy posted, LSU's numbers being 99 OVR, 92 Offense, 95 Defense (wherever he found the official defensive number at). But how the hell does 92 offense and 95 defense (even with a 97 special teams) equal 99 OVR? 92 offense, 95 defense and 97 special teams, to me, would equal 95 OVR or so, not 99 OVR.Quote:
Originally Posted by psuexv
I think the OVR is on a curve, so the best team will always be a 99 OVRQuote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
...it's also tied to specific ratings among players. Not an average.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwizzy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwizzy
Ah, alright. I was thinking they were on an average basis of the offense/defense/special teams scores, so that makes sense now. Still, some of those ratings are overrated as hell, especially on offense.Quote:
Originally Posted by JBHuskers
It is bad enough they have UGAg higher than my COCKS but to have clempson rated higher? :smh: How in the fudge did they come up with that? We have whipped them three years in a row?
Whoa UL is superunderated thats not right for a team shareing the big east title with a true fresman QB.
And well sure might as well overrate ohio state to keep they fans happy 20$ says their QB a 87+ even though if u ever watched him on tv. u wonder how the fuck he made it to the college level.
Kinda being mean on temple with 2 stars they got into a AQ confrence...
What RTARD gave wvu a 87 on Offence? 95+ I THINK
Cincy, UL, and rutgers 3 stars:fp: Each got at least a 4 star guy this year, rutgers got a 5.
Rutgers and pitt overrated on Offence both don't have a sure stating QB, and last year their starters were bad.
NCST kinda up their:confused:
UH sould be a 90+ on offence
Southern miss OMFG really?
How can any team that get bitchslapped 70-13 be rated higher than the team that bitchslapped them? Bowl game, smowl game, 70-13 is not a fuckin' fluke.Quote:
Originally Posted by SCClassof93
Do you guys ever rerate players in the game? like say a starting QB gets hurt and his back up turns out to be one of the best in the game. (oklahoma vs cincy tony pike)
Im talking about rerateing teams......... DEMO TIME TTYL
yeah, these ratings are weird. Funny thing is, UofL's ratings are right around where I'd thought they'd be. Hope we got a top 25 nod in the game .