You can view the page at http://www.thegamingtailgate.com/for...ew-Screenshots
Printable View
You can view the page at http://www.thegamingtailgate.com/for...ew-Screenshots
If you notice, the ADIDAS logo for the Husker jerseys is now in the middle, which is new for this year.
not much of a equipment guy myself, but all the new stuff looks nice.
Me either...but it was a big complaint that seemed to be fixed, and then the problem showed up in the final build of 10 somehow. Iowa fans were (understandably) up at arms on it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Solidice
I can understand the Iowa situation the last 2 years. '09 having the wrong color numbers, and last year with the wrong facemask color. in NCAA 10, with the lighting system they had, TTU's black jersey looked terrible in day games when the player was in the shade. it had an un-natural "shine" to it. looked really weird, close to being gray/silver. I hope the new lighting fixes that.Quote:
Originally Posted by JBHuskers
http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-...0_230670_n.jpg
Look at that football!
It's about time we got a Nebraska screenshot!
Yeah I made sure to use that as the thumbnail when we posted it on our Facebook page :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Lava
http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/The...4373441?ref=ts
Wow! I think that this year is the first year ever that I have seen an Arizona State Sun Devils pic before the release of the game. :popcorn: Now let's get that next recruiting blog:popcorn: up EA.
Atta boy! :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by JBHuskers
Looks amazing. Hopefully the game plays as well as it looks.
These pics really show off the linear lighting and "self-shadowing". Very impressive to see a shadow of a hand or a facemask. Looks great.
You don't know about this? There is a little known tradition between VT and BSU that instead of usng a regular football they use one of those cheap novelty blow up kind. He he. ;-)Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBlue
All the other screenshots look fine. This one must be a fluke.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuce
Wow! I missed that. That thing rivals the size of the CFL (Canadian) ball:D
Anybody else notice that there are 2 kinds of footballs in those shots. Wilson (which is a tad smaller) and the Nike is in many shots. I wonder if it's random or by teams that use them. These shots really look good.
Oh and many pac 10 pics. :) I'm just happy no UW pics.
I think the ball may not change size when they zoom in.
Here it is too big: http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-..._1309121_n.jpg
Then here it looks ok:
http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-..._8320826_n.jpg
It may be that the more zoomed out you are it is harder to see the relative size of the ball. The other zoomed out pics look also look ok.
I'm lookin at the Miami Pic is it just me or does that look like an direct Snap to the running back:eek:
Ya, I think you're right. I was wondering what the QB was doing but that would explain it.Quote:
Originally Posted by champ195797
That could make for some photoshop fun. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Deuce
Hard to say, it may be a draw with th QB turning to watch the play after completing his 'pass action' or just beginning his 'pass action'. Idk.Quote:
Originally Posted by champ195797
It can be any one of those. Not sure if that animation would be triggered on a QB choice or not :confused: when you choose to give it to the RB.Quote:
Originally Posted by steelerfan
jb this is a perfect time for one of your tease hints:confused:
LOL there isn't anything hidden here. I'm just saying that any of those things could be the case. I'm going to lean towards the direct snap.Quote:
Originally Posted by champ195797
Got to get my hands on NCAA 11 quick !! :) This game looks very tight ..
Direct snap I say....
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=4048756&id=90440037279#!/photo.php?pid=4048775&id=90440037279&fbid=39739966 7279 This pic has the same action by the qb. Miami pic could just be a misdirection counter play. The lineman is already engaged in the back field, so there has been some time between the snap. I think they just did a really good job this year on fakes. See also http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=4048756&id=90440037279#!/photo.php?pid=4048778&id=90440037279&fbid=39739968 7279Quote:
Originally Posted by champ195797
I think there have been some direct snaps in the last couple years though.