I don't get it, should they not be able to?
Printable View
Don't they also have to sit out 2 years if there is a transfer within the conference?
Found this:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...c_players.html
Obviously sounds like it's up to the individual conferences and at least the Pac-10 did away with it.Quote:
UPDATE --- And to clarify this further in light of some questions I've gotten, the Pac-10 did use to have a rule that players transferring within the conference had to sit out two years, enacted to really try to discourage anyone ever doing that. In 2004 the rule was amended so that it was the same as the general NCAA rule, that players could transfer just sitting out one year. In this case, the Pac-10 is merely saying that its usual transfer rule will remain in place regardless of the rule that has been enacted by the NCAA allowing players in programs that have post-season bans to transfer if their eligibility runs out before the post-season ban does (in this case, juniors and seniors at USC). The reason is obviously that the conference did not want to encourage other Pac-10 teams to try to "poach'' players away from USC.
Interesting, thanks for the info.
Thanks man. Hope to see some of y'all around Monday night ;)
How many recruits can you create before the start of a season this year? I believe last year it was 30.
The coach gets to decide if he releases the player from their scholarship or not. USUALLY the coach rules that you cannot go to a team in your conference. No matter where they go, they have to sit a year (unless they go to 1-AA, D2, or D3). If they go to a school they're allowed to go to, they'll still be able to stay under scholarship while they sit. If the player chooses, they can go to a school the coach doesn't allow (usually conference opponents, OOC rivals and sometimes future opponents). They then have to sit a year, while not being under scholarship. Every now and then the coach will allow a player to go within conference (Mark Richt sent some player to Mississippi State) and while the player still has to sit out a year, they'll be under scholarship.
I'm 99% sure that's how this works, and I hope that made sense.
Didn't see this asked yet unless I overlooked it. Many apologies if this has already been asked.
If I elect to play as an Offensive Coordinator or Defensive Coordinator in an Online Dynasty and meet up with another User who is a Head Coach, how is the game handled? Will I still be controlling my OC/DC duties only, or does it revert to me being a Head Coach?
You'll still retain full coaching, both offense and defense, in User vs User OD games. That's for all combinations of positions ... it's treated as if you're both Head Coaches, no matter your actual assignment.
In all Online Dynasty User vs User games, you'll be controlling both sides of the ball. They did this because it'd be a pain in the ass if both of you are OCs and therefore just have to keep watching as your opponent plays and no interaction from you until it's your turn to be on offense.
Any word on the 3 star recruits actually being decent in this game?
This makes me a little sad.
I thought it would've been cool where you watch him on offense, then he watches you on offense. I understand usually it's boring to have no control over anything in a game but in this case I'de be fine with having to watch your defense against the user's offense in the Broadcast view and wait for your chance where they then watch you. It would add to the tension in the game I would think. Say they go down and score then you know you gotta match it or fall behind. I think it would've made for a fun OC vs OC user match. At least in Coach Mode it would've made sense. I think maybe they should make it optional like a Yes-No thing the commish can choose when creating the dynasty. User Match Coordinator Restrictions: Yes - No type of deal.
Question: Sorry for the repost but I'm really curious. If you have an OC or DC position, when you go to play that side of the ball can you still play co-op; as in both players playing a position while 1st player does the play calling?
I think three star recruits are jus fine some turn into studs and others don't. I will say though some of them take a little more user attention than others some of my favorite players have been three stars on the game. They have actually played better than some 5 stars.
oweb, he's talking about NCAA 12 and if anything has changed from 11. 3-star players, by and large, weren't competitive in NCAA 11.
Correct. Basically what I am saying is that 3 star recruits in real life are sometimes just as good as 4 stars and sometimes even 5 stars, just they are lacking in one area such as like height or weight. Alot of 3 stars are just under-rated in real life I believe. I was just wondering if they were a little better in the game than they were last year because last year IMO they came in looking like 2 stars, some werent even good enough to get any playing time at all!
hester, it's going to take a lot more comparison for me to really be able to answer your question ... but on first glance, the 3-stars at least look better. There was one notable CB on TCU's board that was a 3-star ... he had much better than average SPD/AGI/ACC, which was one of the big problems with 3-star prospects last year at skill positions, but lacked in the MCV/ZCV area. I think that's what you would generally expect from a 3-star in real life, so it's at least promising.
I didn't notice in 11 and haven't seen it asked/answered but are the appropriate logos showing up on schools jerseys when they change conferences? What about home field conference logos?
When you consider how ornery some schools seem to get about their uniform details in the game, it'd be real difficult to--for example--convince Texas that it should be okay for their uniforms to have a Pac-12 patch on them because some video gamer wanted them to leave the Big 12. :D
If you upload a teambuilder team into an offline dynasty are you still required to replace a team or can you simply add them to a conference now? Also if you can simply add them without removing them does that teambuilder team have 0 existing school records? Thanks for the info guys!
nvm
Any word on recruiting difficulty compared to last year? I really liked Heisman and will probably use it again in 12.
Is job security editable in the coach edit menu? I know prestige is, but I haven't heard much about job security. Thanks in advance.
From my understanding there are certain set job security when starting out a new contract. 47%-57% or something like that. I don't see why as a coach you should be able to change that cuz it's the school thing. Now Coach Prestige I can see being able to change cuz that's not to do with the school but the coach.
Since real coaches are now being included in most named rosters, I think it would be even better to set who is and isn't on the hot seat. Again, starting job security might be randomized and can't be touched, but I am always for more options, especially when it comes to editing.
It depends on who you were trying to compete with ;) In previous years, you could take a servicable 3-star and have him grow into a decent starter for a top-tier team -- a team that would normally be getting 4- and 5-star players. That didn't happen last year. I took on a heavy amount of 3-star players in my first season, and I suffered for it. They all started low in OVR and progressed horribly.
He means from outside the dynasty, when you're setting up rosters.
Everyone starts at nearly the same point. Head Coaches are all in the 56-58% range, and coordinators are somewhere in the 40-46% range, I think, I can't remember their exact range. I agree that for realism it would be nice to be able to edit it, but with how heavily it fluctuates in even one season, I'm actually glad everyone starts out evenly.