Welcome to the Transitive Property of Logic for those incapable of understanding that each week is different.Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Look, DIV III Liberty is better than Clemson using RAM's infallible logic.
Printable View
Welcome to the Transitive Property of Logic for those incapable of understanding that each week is different.Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Look, DIV III Liberty is better than Clemson using RAM's infallible logic.
That link is cool!Quote:
Originally Posted by bdoughty
Lol at you trying to say games hardly come down to the last minutes and it happens again!
And I get something right again! Because I picked based on what the league wants,not on who you think the better team is.
But yeah,I'm just lucky again while you people who are supposed to know so much about football don't pick right.
That's funny and yet you believe Temple can be nationally ranked when all they ever get is Jr college rejects lolQuote:
Originally Posted by bdoughty
Heck,it's sad you can't even see how Nebraska just lays down every game and as soon as all the money is on them to lose they pull a miracle out of their ass
Yeah, there are a bunch of cases like Temple. Look at Kansas St. They went from losing records every year in the Big 8, to being ranked yearly. They even do it with walk on players that actually start quite often in their system.Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Nebraska just lays down every game?
http://i.imgur.com/V1XMeai.jpg
Wow, you made one more correct pick this week than myself, cdj and CLW. And you finished FOUR correct picks behind JB this week.Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
And I still lead your ass in first place overall for the entire season.
Yep, you sure showed us. :eyeroll: :fp: :ram?: :ram:
I don't even know how to address this.Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
NO ONE BUT YOU claims to have some all-knowing knowledge of football. We're all sane enough to make picks based on what we THINK will happen, NOT based on what we "know."
And once again, picks don't prove anything. If they can't disprove your theory, they also CAN NOT prove your theory either.
The fact that this theory of yours is based solely on a game being close near the end is ridiculous. Every time there's a boring, non-competitive blow out, your keyboard has cobwebs but the second a game is decided by a touchdown or less, you scream from the mountain tops how it's not realistic. You have yet to answer my question of what is an appropriate amount of close games. You obviously have never played a sport. I have. Multiple sports. I've played in games where we blew the other team out and I've played in games where we blew the other team out. I've played in close games where we lost and I've played in close games where we won. That's sports. You're putting way too much stock into the word entertainment. They use that phrase for tax purposes, not to justify a conspiracy.
Too bad I forgot to do it last week :fp:Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
But I'm not eligible for the prize. My prize is beating :ram: on a week by week basis.
Hmm, new CFP rankings. Clemson #1, Alabama #2, Ohio State #3 and Notre Dame #4.Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
So much for making Clemson look weaker and moving them out of the top 4 so that Notre Dame could be moved in. :eyeroll:
Ram is in Fallout 4...
http://imgur.com/KZC608i.jpg
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Oh it must be next week that they are getting bumpedQuote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
this is by far the most illogical thing youve said. How in the heck do you have a college degree?Quote:
Knowledge is irrelevant. Making picks doesn't prove or disprove knowledge. It isn't a trivia game.
if knowledge were irrelevant you'd pick the Jaguars every week for no reason.
Therefore making correct picks does prove a certain amount of knowledge.
but what you fail to understand is you are also agreeing with meis the same as saying me making wrong picks does not prove games arent staged. You can know you are being deceived without knowing how or when.Quote:
Making picks doesn't prove or disprove knowledge
hey slowpoke, where did I say it needed to be immediate? Clemson will be out of the top 4. I didnt claim it was this week. They were made to look not that good in the Florida State game and will eventually be moved down.Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
College Degree is Ram's new Cognitive Dissonance.Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
http://i.imgur.com/y0cl57H.gif
http://thefixisin.net/resources/eyepoke.gif
Quote:
Who does that? Who just walks up to someone else and pokes them in the eye? And how did CBS have a camera ready to capture it?
Quote:
The odd part was that although Jim Nance and Phil Simms lavished even more praise on Manning, the QB legend fell a mere 3 yards shy of breaking Brett Favre's all-time passing yardage mark in the loss. Was it intentional? Manning can now break Favre's record while also setting a new record for all-time wins by a QB on Sunday at home versus the Chiefs. What are the chances that doesn't play out on national TV during the Peyton Manning send-off celebration of 2015?
Ah, I see, since it didn't happen this week and you can't go "aha, I told you so!", now comes the usual bait and switch, " oh, I didn't mean this week. I meant next week" or my favorite, "I was a year early."Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
And technically, yes, it did need to be immediate. You said they were made to appear weak so they could be moved out of the top 4, Alabama could be moved up AND Notre Dame could be moved into the Top 4 because of the almighty "interest". You never said Clemson was made to appear weak so they could be moved out of the Top 4 a fucking month later. When you made that post, Clemson was #1, Alabama was #4 and Notre Dame was outside at #5.
Ergo (that means therefore by the way, I know this all can be a bit too much to process in your peanut sized brain), logic, actual logic, not your retarded brain dead head up your ass logic, suggests that post was made with the intention of it happening this week, not a future week. But I'm sure you were just a year early. :eyeroll:
And I would love to know how they didn't look that good against Florida State. This isn't like Alabama beating Vanderbilt only 14-10 or something. Florida State is good. Lets see, last four years for Florida State, 12-2, 14-0 with and a national championship, 13-1 with their only loss coming in the College Football Playoff, and this year 7-2 with one of those losses coming at the hands of Clemson.
So it's fair to say Florida State is a pretty good fucking team. Now lets look at that game. Clemson never trailed by more than 7 points. And from the 11 minute mark in the second quarter through to the end of the game, Clemson outscored Florida State 20-3. Yep, Clemson definitely looked weak there!
I guess if beating a really damn good Florida State team by only 10 points means it makes them look weak and not that good, then I guess Notre Dame is the weakest team around! Only beat Virginia by 7. Only beat a bad Georgia Tech by 8. Lost to Clemson! Struggled to beat USC by 10. Needed a last minute touchdown to beat little old Group of 5 member Temple by 4. And only beat Pittsburgh by 12. Now THAT is being made to look weak and not that good.
I'm getting ready for work so I don't have time to respond to this idiocy right now. Just know that I don't agree with your bullshit theory or "logic" AT ALL.Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Your theory is based solely on a game being close at the end. That's absolutely ridiculous. There's 14-16 games per week. If you don't think some are going to be close then you have no idea how statistical probability works.
Well, let's see how long it takes douchecanoe to try and come on here claiming how fixed and dramatic tonight's game was, even though despite a 5 point margin, was essentially Buffalo ass-raping the Jets all night until the Jets managed a touchdown toward the end of the third quarter and halfway through the fourth. And even after that touchdown, Buffalo still made the Jets their bitch the rest of the fourth quarter.
Tonight may go down as one of the most boring 5 point margin of victory games in the last 20 years. But of course, it was fixed and oozing with drama solely because it was a 5 point game. :eyeroll:
CBS had a camera ready for the eye poke because there is always a camera ready on the players after the play :fp: every time there is a skirmish the cameras show it.
:DQuote:
Originally Posted by JBHuskers
What does CBS do after every play? Show the players getting up off the field. Anything involving pushing and shoving or a skirmish, they are going to hawk right in on that damn thing. Ram used to actually try with this stuff, now he's just gone stupid and tries to make dumbass claims about anything and everything.
Exactly. That was fucking dumb.Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
its amazing how you answer your own questions and still cant figure out the obvious
http://static1.squarespace.com/stati...1382703854170/
you deny how quickly the transition and focus was. Its a wide shot,never a shoulder height close up like that on a regular basis.Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
deny,deny,deny
:fp: Good lord, you're just grasping for straws now. Not even giving it any effort anymore. We very well may finally have reached the point where this thread has run its course. Instead of being entertaining, it's becoming almost sad as this display of psychosis reaches the point of jumping the shark.
i'm not the one grasping. You're the one legitimately buying a tough, black guy adult thinking he should go poke a guy in the eye as retaliation lol. look at it and tell me you can tell he gets close to the eye or even applies that much pressure. You cant tell at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
from another forum. People just keep buying the unrealistic drama over and overQuote:
It's amazing how bad teams can remember they're bad at the very end of the game when they've dominated the entire time. We've seen it three times in the last 3 hours.
What is realistic drama?Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
There is none. Every close game is fixed and unrealistic drama. Every blowout just plain never happened and never existed as it doesn't conform to and fit the absurd claims.Quote:
Originally Posted by souljahbill
:nod:Sports=the greatest reality show on Earth, things happen that in a scripted show the writers would be fired for writing crazy shit!
— Jay Glazer (@JayGlazer) November 15, 2015
LOL look who's calling someone stupid. A young hypocritical Christian who cant even make good football picks on a consistent basis,while telling me I'm just lucky every week.Quote:
A suggestion everyone will be in support of
Less ram stupidity.
Guess what dipshit, you've repeatedly said yourself that getting picks right or wrong means nothing! Guess what? That means whether your made good picks or someone else made bad picks, it all means the same thing. Absolutely nothing! You don't get to try and claim both sides of the equation dipshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Beat me to it.Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
Don't you ever try to use my religion as an insult to me again.Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
what kind of childish, illogical remark was that?Quote:
Originally Posted by baseballplyrmvp
LOL that makes no sense at all. I called you out on your Christian supposed values mocking and disrespecting an elder. You'll just have to take it child. Have a nice day.
now...the Patriots are playing the Giants without two starting offensive tackles and a linebacker. I dont give a damn how good a team you think the Pats are. They shouldnt win lacking those players.
Packers: pure bull from left to right. What? are we supposed to believe the Lions just started winning because their owner said things will change a week ago? Sure, all the sudden the Packers act like a division 3 team and cant do anything right.
dont give me the - its a division game - excuse. A bad team is a bad team and that game was bullpucky.
Manning: out of the blue he has some foot and rib issue and now they are behind in a game...but they started him?
but if Denver loses,how do excuse them losing to the Colts when Luck was having a bad shoulder,ribs and a lacerated kidney???? and he didnt act like he was in pain ever?
do you guys pay attention to any of the injury reports at all?
how could you pick the Saints Smooth? how could you?
So I gotta say, what fucking idiot is writing these scripts? Our NFL Overlords are run by fucking morons.
According to douchecanoe, Manning didn't set the yards record last week because they intentionally wanted him to set it at home. So you take a QB breaking a major record, and instead of having him break it on NATIONAL prime time TV (THE DRAMAZZ!!!), you have him break it the next weekend when only maybe HALF of the entire fucking country even gets to watch the game, while everyone else is forced to watch Patriots-Giants.
What fucking moron is writing this shit? This is as stupid as those shitty pictures douchecanoe makes in MS Paint.
what moron believes the best QBs and the best teams all just act like crap on the same day? The number 1 defense all the sudden acts like the Saints against the pathetic Chiefs?Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
You ignore Why Peyton didnt throw a pass Immediately to score last week and they call a run play?
Ben Roth- isnt supposed to play but he does and its like he started anyway?
inconsistency after inconsistency and you just keep buying them as a coincidence?
The best QBs play like crap??? Ben, Brady, Eli, Cam, Rodgers all had good days. Ohhhh Peyton has a bad day = ALL QBs. Got it :up:
So Manning will probably break the record in Chicago next week. That makes perfect sense
Oh, look at that. Just completely ignore the point made and instead deflect to something else. How unexpected. :eyeroll:Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Only a pathetic excuse of a human makes fun of someone else for their religion. It makes you no better than the people who make fun of disabled people.Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Mocking and disrespecting an elder? Ok, but I can't help it that the crap you're spewing is just plain retarded. For the 100th time, you can't pick and choose what games fit your claim just based on the final score. Since every game follows the same set of rules, every game has to fit in order for your conspiracy theory to fit. But since you can't prove that every game fits your claim, it holds zero water and just makes you full of bullshit.