I thought we were going to shoot for 9 teams in each Conference to assure that we played each User?
Printable View
I thought we were going to shoot for 9 teams in each Conference to assure that we played each User?
You'd probably never have a PvP national championship game like that.Quote:
Originally Posted by psusnoop
I thought we voted on it and split conferences was the winner?Quote:
Originally Posted by psusnoop
No, the vote was whether it would be two 9-10 team conferences or one 16 team conference. I believe the two conferences won.Quote:
Originally Posted by razorback44
Quote:
Originally Posted by gschwendt
Correct, I just thought we were using 9 team conferences over 2 10 team conferences :dunno:
Looks like with 10 team conferences you also play everyone... just depends on whether we want 4 OOC games or 3.
http://www.thegamingtailgate.com/for...om-Conferences
9 schools – 8 conference games. There are no protected rivals since everyone plays everyone else.
10 schools – 9 conference games. There are no protected rivals since everyone plays everyone else.
I missed this, good to know.Quote:
Originally Posted by gschwendt
I'd be fine with 3 OOC games. I would want to play 2 out of Stanford, Cal and UCLA and then one user OOC *cough*LSU*cough*
Yeah, I was good with 3 OOC games as well, one will probably be Oklahoma another will probably be Arkansas if Razorback is up for it (maybe not every year) and the third will be a tune up game.Quote:
Originally Posted by psuexv
Yeah, I was good with 3 OOC games as well, one will probably be Oklahoma another will probably be Arkansas if Razorback is up for it (maybe not every year) and the third will be a tune up game.Quote:
Originally Posted by psuexv
3 OOC games is good with me. We only have 2 rivals, so it's not a big deal of who I get to play against.
Unless you put yourself in the SEC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneback
I'm down with playing Texas yearly. I wish we would do it in real life as we'll personally.
Why do you want me out of the Big 12? If you haven't noticed Texas pretty much owns the Big 12 :). It should be named the Big 12 presented by The University of Texas.Quote:
Originally Posted by psuexv
Because if you're out of the Big 12, then I run the table every season :easy: (minus possibly nykia since we've never played)
Actually I thought we were doing the Big Ten? I was proposing it so that A&M and you would have actually rivalry games in conference. If you want to run with the big boys though that's fine ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneback
USC - Psuexv
Notre Dame - Nykia
Ohio State - Tex
Oregon - Snoop
Okie State - Kingpin
Yeah I don't think so.Quote:
Originally Posted by gschwendt
I stand by my statement. :cool:
Looks like an easy undefeated season to me. :P :DQuote:
Originally Posted by psuexv
I have my money on LSU vs tOSU for the national title in year 1.
BoooooooQuote:
Originally Posted by gschwendt
Wait I forgot I'm in the SEC. Carry on G.
Hey, I don't feel the need to beat down on the little sisters of the poor, aTm ran away to the $EC so they could pay their bills. :sarcasm:Quote:
Originally Posted by psuexv
Quote:
Originally Posted by Papa LoneStar
I like this guy ^^^^^
No you were right in saying that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingpin32
New season this year boys. Time to ruin some dreams and make Nike proud!
I like how Auburn is just forgotten about! Quite a bit of disrespect being shown around here. We will do our talking on the field. Hopefully OB doesn't win a National Championship against the CPU and then "not have time" to continue to play this year! :P I cannot wait until I can make a REAL custom playbook this season.
I plan on ending dreams this year.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gschwendt
You guys clearly have me on ignore. I said that two (three now) pages ago! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by psusnoop
( Side note, if it wasn't for TGT copying/pasting most of the articles, we'd have no way to go back and look at blogs from years past. That sucks. )
You have Pittsburgh and Syracuse both in the Big East twice. You don't know how to spell Connecticut.Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneback
As you said though, that's a ton of realignment. If you'd like, I could put together something to try to minimize the number of changes. I'd be less concerned about making the CPU conferences "fair" than you probably are, most likely, but unless we stack every Top 25 team in one conference, I don't see that as a big problem.
I was actually trying to be more regional with the conferences.Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffHCross
So Jeff has pulled off the decision 2012 and has decided to move from Alabama to FSU...so that means Bama is up for bids.
This means that the following coaches have a chance to claim Bama (in order):
ryby6969 - Auburn
gschwendt - Michigan
psusnoop - Oregon
Escobar - Texas A&M
texacotea - Ohio State
kingpin - Oklahoma State
If Bama is picked up that coaches team will become available until we get to the end of the list....so go!
I'm going to be out of pocket tomorrow so if Ryby responds, I plan to stick with Michigan... want to keep my rivalry matchup with tex.
Yes I will switch. Hopefully someone will take Auburn so there will be that rivalry.
ryby6969 - Alabama
gschwendt - Michigan
Left to pick.
psusnoop - Oregon
Escobar - Texas A&M
texacotea - Ohio State
kingpin - Oklahoma State
Auburn is on the block.
I'm going to stick with Oregon.
Really putting the pressure on Tex to stay with OSU :)Quote:
Originally Posted by gschwendt
I'm shocked! Shocked I say!Quote:
Originally Posted by ryby6969
Oh, and this is overdue:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4vMQX5-2Tw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_vpfblTqng
ryby6969 - Alabama
gschwendt - Michigan
psusnoop - Oregon
Left to pick.
Escobar - Texas A&M
texacotea - Ohio State
kingpin - Oklahoma State
Auburn is on the block.
I'm sure I'll be staying with OK State.