Yeah, I'm sort of disappointed my request wasn't granted. I figured my "Case. Closed." would be just that, case closed. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by souljahbill
Printable View
Yeah, I'm sort of disappointed my request wasn't granted. I figured my "Case. Closed." would be just that, case closed. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by souljahbill
Ah well. It'll be interesting to hear his analysis for the championship games and Super Bowl. Then there will be Free Agency and the Draft which are also fixed so there's plenty more "stories" to tell.Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
I'm not an NFL guy but I gotta admit, Ram and this thread made me more interested in pro football. I was excited to read the weekly train wreck.
Same here. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by souljahbill
Over the last year or two, I started really only following the Broncos and not paying much attention to the rest of the league. This year I played attention to all of the league.
#TheScriptIsDead
honestly this thread at some point has to come to and end right? it has to be one of the longest (if not THE longest) thread on the site and its based off of nonsense
It is clear.Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
1+2=3 3 is Wilson's number.
Taking the numbers that are pictured: 12+12+12+12=48 4+8=12
Talking the actual QB numbers: 12+12+12+3=39 3+9=12
12: 1+2=3
Obviously, the key number is 3. So what does 3 mean?
Does 3 mean #3 Russell Wilson and the Seahawks will win? Does it mean that the team with the 3rd-best odds - Green Bay - will win? Does it mean the Colts will win the 3rd Super Bowl in Franchise history? Does it mean that the QB with 3 letters in his first name - Tom Brady - will win? Maybe it means Brady will lose a 3rd Super Bowl?
The point is this. The Script has brought us here and no matter the outcome "3" will be important. (((The Script Knows, Oh Almighty Tin Foil god)))
Perhaps the perfect outcome is #3 Wilson, beating "3-lettered" Tom to hand Brady (don't forget that Mike Brady had 3 boys before he met Carol) his 3rd Super Bowl loss.
Even the network (((Oh Almighty Network))) that is showing the game has 3 letters in it's name (nevermind that all 3 networks that have it in any given year have 3 letters).
Is all of this a coincidence? Come on people, use your logical brains!
#TheScriptIsDead
Gold ^^^^**Quote:
Originally Posted by steelerfan
See, we kinda gotta keep the party rolling. The jokes just keep coming.
This guy is faking.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/since--...ory&soc_trk=tw
#TheScriptIsDead
Come on! It was completely fixed! An Ohio high school wins their 8th state title, then the Buckeyes win their 8th national title? Come on, open your minds! You lemmings will believe anything! You just sat there and let ESPN and the NCAA spoon feed you this bullshit about a team with a third string QB shutting out the mighty Wisconsin, dominating the mighty Alabama and then bitch slapping the mighty Oregon without so much as breaking a sweat? Get real!
Could they possibly be any more blatant about their scripting than that! Now the drooling masses get to cheer, belch and hump each other over a win by the crappy Big Ten, supposedly putting the final stake in the end of the mighty SEC's reign! And then to have Ohio State commit four turnovers and still control the game from start to finish? Ohio State turned it over four times and still was never in danger of losing. How blatant can you get? And then Ohio State running up the score like that at the end, just so the sports bookies and Vegas can win again on the spread. They are sitting right there rubbing it in your faces and you common man drooling masses refuse to open your minds and see the truth right in front of you! Come on, tell these drooling neanderthals Ram!
Ohio State winning is bull as well.
a QB with 10 games experience beats Alabama and Oregon on big stages.
its even more fishy that he's 22 to begin with. None of these people are student athletes by any stretch of the imagination.
and you all know the Coach Urban is just another shady, dishonest schill who fled a program with a bullcrap health issue while recruiting stuff and the Hernandez thing was going down. I don't know if the dates of things match up or not? it doesn't matter. College ball is corrupt anyway. Its all bull
Come on Ram, surely you can do better! I mean, hell, I put up a better argument than you! You're starting to lose your touch there sockboy.
#TheScriptIsDead
no,..right after the Cards built theirs they got to host one and then go and lose to Pitt.Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
Of course Atlanta will now host a SB and the owner gets to keep all the box and concession profits. That's why these guys are building new stadiums. The nfl shares all the top 85% of profits but all owners get to keep concessions and Box profits. So make them larger and more expensive and cash in.
SF didn't make their recent playoff runs till they announced they were building a new stadium. But of course thats all just coincidence to you
these are not the stats of someone prepared to play in a national championship game...and yet he did ?
http://i600.photobucket.com/albums/t...ps97512bed.png
The Idiot Strikes Back
Dude got PT in the 2nd half of blowouts. When he got in, it was with the 2nd stringers and the goal was to essentially eat the clock. Of course his stats are great. Give him the 1st string line, receivers, and running back and all the practice reps and lo and behold, he was a better player! You don't say?!
He still never addressed the dozens of his theories that were proven wrong.
Using Tapatalk on my Samsung Galaxy S5 for shats & gaggles.
No he did not and like the others I propose that this thread be closed.Quote:
Originally Posted by JBHuskers
He's not going to. The answer will be that him being wrong doesn't disprove anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by JBHuskers
Lets look here.Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Kent State, a 66-0 blowout win. He played garbage time in the second half, likely not until the fourth quarter as they were still trying to get Barrett situated as starter and what better than a cupcake like Kent State. Still went 2-4 for 32 yards with a long of a 30 yard pass and ran for 37 yards on four carries.
Cincinnati, a 50-28 blowout win. Didn't pass any, but did have 10 yards on a single run, likely in garbage time in the final minutes of the game when they were running the ball to chew up clock.
Maryland, a 52-24 blowout win. More garbage time play, had one pass (which he completed), likely a screen pass or dump pass behind the line of scrimmage that ended up being a three yard loss. Still ran for 50 yards on 6 carries.
Rutgers, a 56-17 blowout win. Yet again playing in garbage time, didn't pass any (because of chewing up clock), but still ran for 44 yards on 5 carries.
Penn State, a 31-24 double overtime win. Wow, didn't play except for one run because it was a close game and the second string never got in!
Illinois, a 55-14 blowout win. More garbage time for the second string, had a solid late game performance of 5-9 for 82 yards and two touchdown passes, on top of 47 yards rushing on just 7 carries.
Michigan State, a 49-37 win, Minnesota, a 31-24 win and Indiana, a 42-27 late game victory-clinching win, never played because the first string was forced to play the entire game.
Michigan, a 42-28 solid win, got forced in late because of Barrett being injured. Still went 2-3 for 7 yards and ran for 18 yards on two carries.
Wisconsin, a 59-0 blowout laugher, his first true game starting, got to actually show what he could do, going 12-17 for 257 yards and three touchdowns as Ohio State horsefucked Wisconsin.
Alabama, a close 42-35 battle, had some mistakes (1 interception), but still had a solid game going 18-35 for 243 yards and one touchdown, along with 43 yards on 17 rushes (fewer yards per carry average due to a better defense).
Oregon, a 42-20 blowout win that Ohio State dominated from start to finish and would have been 50+ to only 13 or 17 if not for all the fumbles, went 16-23 for 242 yards, had a touchdown and an interception that was the fault of the dumbass receiver. Also had 38 yards on 21 carries (fewer yards per carry average due to a better defense).
Now, was that so hard for your birdshit brain to figure out? :fp:
absolutely none of my theories have been proven wrong and I have addressed them. Game picks have nothing to do with the theory that games are rigged
if you are talking about game picks being wrong..for the millionth time that of course has nothing to do with games being rigged and doesn't prove they aren't.
now..what is you excuse for the media saying Manning had an injury for a month that was serious but never reported as the rules state it should be = easy answer, it was all made up in the first place.
you fools watched Oregon pass up an easy 3 and of course thought it was just bad coaching.....
I don't recall anyone saying Peyton Manning had a serious injury. Pulled quads aren't nearly as bad as pulled hamstrings.
And the 1st rule of football is, "If you ain't hurt, you ain't playing." Come playoff time, no team is healthy. Everyone is hurt.
And going for the TD inside the opponents 5 is not bad coaching. That's aggressive coaching. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.
LOL another coincidental 12)))))
https://twitter.com/ESPNNFL/status/555167500774567936
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AFC_Championship_Game
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B7QLZ9jCAAADjqO.jpg
but you just drink your beer and think its all just happenstance, Don't you, you silly little sports fan.Quote:
Sunday will be the the 12th consecutive AFC championship featuring the @Patriots, @Steelers, @Colts or @Broncos.
You seriously have ZERO clue about coaching strategies, do you? Christ, all of the college football coaches ESPN had in the film room were even saying that is a call they ALL would have made as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
It was 14-7 Ohio State already. Had it not been for the never ending retarded fumbles, it would have been 21-7 or even 28-7 Ohio State. A field goal wasn't going to cut it. You're on the three yard line of your opponent. Who the fuck would kick a field goal in that situation?
You're basically raising the white flag and saying, yep, we can't beat your defense, we can't move the ball three whole yards for a touchdown, we're just gonna puss out, put our dicks between our legs and kick a field goal because we're not man enough to move the ball a whopping three yards.
Ram, you're not a football coach. You have literally zero fucking clue when it comes to strategies and coaching calls. Stop thinking and trying to act like you're the encyclopedia of play calling and strategy. You're not.
:D :D :DQuote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
So now your new claim that it's all rigged is that for 12 straight years one of a specific four out of 16 teams have made the championship game? You realize that's really not that difficult to believe. Hell, that is in fact a proof that it's not rigged! If four specific teams have made appearances in the AFC Championship Game for a stretch of 12 straight years out of 16 teams, then CLEARLY there is not "parity" in the NFL, which you've been claiming this magical parity as reasoning why the league is rigged. You just debunked your own thread.
I was about to post the same thing :)Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
But he has also claimed that there can't be dynasties, once again it's the beautiful thing about conspiracy theory. You state the opposites do you are never wrong
Yeah the odds, if all teams are equal, to make the championship game are 1 in 8 because 2 teams make it. The 4 teams listed make up a full 25% of the AFC. The odds aren't as astronomical as he thinks even IF the teams were equal. However, the teams are not equal and he ALWAYS overlooks that variable.Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
So, ram, if the Patriots played in a league with 31 Pop Warner teams, would it be impossible for you to believe that they won 100 consecutive Super Bowls? Of course not, in that extreme example it is easy to understand that they would succeed.
You like to say that the professional sports leagues weren't fixed until the 70s. If that is true, explain the numerous championships that were won before 1970 by the Yankees, Canadiens, Packers and Celtics. It couldn't be that they were the better teams... could it, child?
#TheScriptIsDead
Based on your response in the Forum Feedback thread you really have no clue do you? You don't even know Jones' situation but you are preaching how he can't be that good? Do some research first and then spew your ramblings. At least take a little pride in your dumbass beliefs
I love how he also claims that picking the game outcomes aren't a valid point in proving its not fixed but uses game predictions to prove that it is
That's all he's done. He uses something as an example of why the game is fixed, then when that something ends up being the opposite, well, that doesn't mean he's wrong, in fact, the opposite now proves that the league is fixed. It's been that way all season.Quote:
Originally Posted by psuexv
Look at the Broncos, all season long, repeatedly saying I don't have to worry, the Broncos will win the Super Bowl. They lose in the Divisional round, now the Broncos losing are proof the league is fixed.
All season long, he says the Browns will make the playoffs, apparently Johnny Douchebag was going to lead them, then when the Browns are eliminated, all of a sudden he changes his story to "building up Browns fans hopes only to rip the carpet out from under them".
All season long, he says the Giants are LOCK for the playoffs. Then once they are eliminated, he changes his tune to saying he's happy they didn't make it because of Arizona's situation of making or missing.
All season long, he says the Cardinals will not make the playoffs. He never said one word about "oh, they'll make the playoffs but they won't make the Super Bowl". All season, it was they WON'T MAKE THE PLAYOFFS because they are hosting the Super Bowl. Then when they clinch a playoff spot, suddenly it's "that's what I've been saying all season, they won't make the Super Bowl". No, you were saying all season they would never make the playoffs.
He says one thing, then flip flops like a fucking trout to take what happens each Sunday and try and shoehorn it into his supposed claims. He's like the NASA engineers during Apollo 13. He's trying to figure out a way to make a square peg fit into a round hole.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2YZnTL596Q
Lol at the Apollo 13 clip
You guys are fucking HILARIOUS!
Exactly.Quote:
Originally Posted by psuexv
He gives examples of the picks he makes correctly in his Pick 'em, or whatever, as PROOF he is right. But when his picks are wrong he says that it is meaningless.
#TheScriptIsDead
:nod:Quote:
Originally Posted by steelerfan
Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Quote:
Originally Posted by souljahbill
Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
So which is it Ram? You post pictures of you getting picks right and saying you're posting them to prove a point that you know what the NFL is "trying to do" and "The fact is the whole piint is people want to be right and I was right and everyone else who thinks they know football was wrong.", and yet every single prediction you get wrong, well now suddenly "Game picks have nothing to do with the theory that games are rigged".Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
So which is it? Either the game picks are proof that the NFL is rigged or they aren't proof that the NFL is rigged. This isn't multiple choice, it isn't a la carte whatever fits your crackpot theory. It's all or none. So either game picks (both right AND wrong) prove or disprove that the league is fixed, or NONE of the game picks (both right AND wrong) prove or disprove that the league is fixed.
Pick. Don't give us the backpedaling bullshit, this is an A or B answer, simple as that. Either all picks (right and wrong) count or none of the picks (right and wrong) count. Pick one.
Bucks v Ducks
Pack v Pats
Pats v Pack
Packers v Patriots
Your point? Oh, that's right, you have no point.Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
What?Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
This is throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks.
highest rated game. Already classified as a pickem.
http://www.patriots.com/news/article...f-530058ec2fb0
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...-be-a-pick-em/
http://www.weei.com/sites/default/fi...2011-30-14.jpg
no,Its called marketing.Quote:
Originally Posted by souljahbill
I'm showing you its no accident they advertise what they do. They don't get lucky and stumble on the whole 12 thing either.
Gibberish from the mind of moron.Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Buckeyes vs Ducks
Hawks vs Pats
Pats vs Hawks
Patriots vs Seahawks
Yeah. Obvious.
#TheScriptIsDead
Dude, you're hilarious, you are aware of what the next football game is after this weekend, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
They don't need Pats vs. Pack "marketing."
ITS THE FUCKING SUPER BOWL!
The game could be Jacksonville vs. Arizona and it would still be the highest rated show on TV.
I wonder what the new claim will be when the Super Bowl ends up being Colts vs. Seahawks. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by souljahbill