Well, true. I guess I just don't see it very likely that neither the Browns nor the Bucs move up. Nor somebody else (Miami). I think if Miami came with a great deal, the Vikes would still take it.Quote:
Originally Posted by steelerfan
Printable View
Well, true. I guess I just don't see it very likely that neither the Browns nor the Bucs move up. Nor somebody else (Miami). I think if Miami came with a great deal, the Vikes would still take it.Quote:
Originally Posted by steelerfan
Not according to the quote in my post. :whistle:Quote:
Originally Posted by baseballplyrmvp
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk 2
You are probably right about Miami. Especially if the Vikings think they'll take a player they don't want (Tannehill). I think the key for Minnesota is to get one of a handful of guys they covet, and a nice return for moving down.Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffHCross
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk 2
pfff you could have changed it. :P i know i didnt write the wrong draft number. :whistle::DQuote:
Originally Posted by steelerfan
:DQuote:
Originally Posted by baseballplyrmvp
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk 2
Some steam gathering that Tampa Bay might be the team trading up to get Richardson.
:smh:Quote:
Originally Posted by JBHuskers
That would be even dumber than the Redskins trading up for Griffin. At least Griffin has the potential (albeit, VERY small potential) to be a 10-15 year QB. Richardson has the potential to have a Peterson type career (GREAT few years followed by so many injuries it's ridiculous). You simply don't trade up for a RB when there isn't one team in the league that uses just one RB anymore because of the punishment these guys sustain on the field week in and week out.
hour and a half left.....who do the vikings take at 3?
I bet they trade it to Cleveland.Quote:
Originally Posted by baseballplyrmvp
Cleveland cock blocks Tampa Bay to get Richardson, and the Vikes could flip the pick they get from Cleveland yet still.
And they gave up 3 picks to do it... 4th, 5th, & 7th I believe. Way too much for one spot.Quote:
Originally Posted by JBHuskers
so then, are they planning on trading peyton hillis?Quote:
Originally Posted by JBHuskers
Which is why they're Cleveland. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by gschwendt
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk 2
Hillis signed with the Chiefs.Quote:
Originally Posted by baseballplyrmvp
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk 2
oh. nevermind then.
Way too much, but they had 13 draft picks.Quote:
Originally Posted by gschwendt
everyone's booing ryan tannehill. lol
If you don't know Dave-Te Thomas, look him up. He was hired by the Raiders in 1967 or 68 to do scouting reports. He was 13!!! 27 teams now bring him in to go over their evaluations with then. He's awesome (unlike the talking heads on ESPN).Quote:
Originally Posted by baseballplyrmvp
Thomas says Tannehill reminds him of David Carr. Enough said.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk 2
It's just not an NFL draft without this classic.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZxNeFLuY98
I hate you.Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
:D Sorry G.Quote:
Originally Posted by gschwendt
i dont think tannehill is all that great. from all the scouting reports on him, they cons say that he stares down his receivers and isnt the greatest decision maker, but he has off the charts potential.Quote:
Originally Posted by steelerfan
i get the reasons why someone would pick him (right situation/right coach could break his habits and turn into a star), but if i was a HC, and i read the cons about him, i'd instantly think that it'd lead to a lot of 3 and outs/interceptions. and he's not someone i'd want to take a chance on. BUT, i'd take tannehill over tebow anyday to run my offense.
You should hate your scouting department. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by gschwendt
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk 2
Well, honestly, I wasn't a fan of the team any of those years... I didn't join up until `97 when Parcells took over.Quote:
Originally Posted by steelerfan
Was the Colts fan they showed at the beginning related to this guy?
http://img.tapatalk.com/62c401e2-e304-21da.jpg
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk 2
what were the odds that a person named luck would go to a team with a horse shoe as its logo?
If he had played for the Irish, I'd say you were on to something. :nod:Quote:
Originally Posted by baseballplyrmvp
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk 2
If he managed to fall into a late round in the draft, I'd consider using a late, day 3 pick on him and make a project out of him, but to draft him as an immediate or near future starter, especially in the first 3 rounds, not sure I'd take a chance.Quote:
Originally Posted by baseballplyrmvp
RG3's girl has a sub 4.40 rack on her...
Pics?Quote:
Originally Posted by gschwendt
especially since he only has what? 15 career starts at qb in college? i havent seen enough from him to convince me that he's worthy of the 1st round status.Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
Don't kill yourself, mors. It will be okay.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk 2
Rebecca LiddicoatQuote:
Originally Posted by souljahbill
http://fandaily.info/wp-content/uplo...end-photos.jpg
yummy
Fitting that, perhaps, the stupidest draftee in NFL history will be a Dallas Cowboy. :D
Boy, the Rams are piling up the picks.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk 2
They now have 3 of the top 13 second round picks, not to mention the rest of the treasure chest they got from Washington.Quote:
Originally Posted by steelerfan
Tannehill's woman...damn!
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
:nod:Quote:
Originally Posted by JBHuskers
Oh yeah, I read an article on Yahoo about her.Quote:
Originally Posted by JBHuskers
Coples to seattle!
edit: guess we're going the trading down route to get ingram/upshaw instead of coples. meh.