Only if those teams offenses are horrible. Why do people think having terrible offenses in your conference is like having a badge of honour? The Big 10 isn't the three yards and a cloud of dust conference anymore. A lot of teams run the read-option and spread now. People need to stop pretending that football is this defensive oriented sport where it's the only way to win. It's not and hasn't been for awhile. Most BCS bowl games are high scoring and most conferences feature high scoring with the average BCS team scoring 29 points a game.
Big 10 stats alone the average Big 10 team IN conference was 26 points per game with a median score of 28.9. So if you see a 10-6 B1G game that means there was a 50-40 game somewhere. How quickly we forget that 101 points were scored in the Big 10 Championship game. Michigan led the Big 10 with the best scoring defense at 16.6 points allowed per game. Wisconsin was next at over 18 points a game. Michigan won one game in a low scoring fashion last year. They beat MSU 12-10. They didn't win a single other game where they scored less than 31 points. Nebraska gave up 70 in the title game and they used to be known for defense.
Every year I read that the "hardcore" fans want NCAA to feature low scoring games and they want to downplay speed. Both are unrealistic claims imo. The great teams in college football score a lot of points now. Great defense is holding someone to under 20 points now, not 10. And speed kills. Everyone wants it and fast players ARE dangerous in both real football and video game football. That's why college coaches recruit speed at the skill spots and the NFL obsesses over it at the combine and in the draft. I think the hardcore fans need to come to grips with this.
On a different not here is an interview from EJ Manual on the new blocking, playbooks and running moves:
http://www.operationsports.com/featu...-14s-gameplay/