To me, LSU's ratings are the givaway here... no way their O is better than their D.
Printable View
To me, LSU's ratings are the givaway here... no way their O is better than their D.
I'm hoping it's just an error. Hopefully they can get them tuned and adjusted before release.
Sent off an email to see if I can verify these ratings.
Kwizzy, any way you can ask about this possible bug as well?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwizzy
While in Nickle and Dime, when you choose "4 DEs" in the sub packages it puts 11 offensive players on the field (or at least it did for me in LSU vs. Bama). The player numbers on the play call screen will be normal but when you return to the field it's all offensive players on defense.
Looks like that info is a little wrong. The columns are mixed up. The first Column is actually the OVR team rating and not offense. The second column is the Offense, and it doesn’t look like the defense column is on there.
This is what we have for LSU
OVR – 99
Off – 92
Def – 95
Even with that new information, in what world does 92 Offense and 95 Defense equal 99 OVR? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Kwizzy
Nevermind, got to em on twitter.
Yeah, Alabama has the same 92 OFF and 95 DEF, and they come out to a 97. Maybe it's something to do with "star" players putting LSU over the top.
Your bug has been passed on, if you get any more specifics just PM em to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Geauxlden
You can't see Alabama's DEF rating, it's not in the chart. Their chart shows OVR, OFF, ST.Quote:
Originally Posted by JSmith03
First column is Overall, 2nd is Offense, Defense is not listed... so 99 OVR -99 Off - 92, Def - unknown.Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
I know that. I was commenting on what Kwizzy posted, LSU's numbers being 99 OVR, 92 Offense, 95 Defense (wherever he found the official defensive number at). But how the hell does 92 offense and 95 defense (even with a 97 special teams) equal 99 OVR? 92 offense, 95 defense and 97 special teams, to me, would equal 95 OVR or so, not 99 OVR.Quote:
Originally Posted by psuexv
I think the OVR is on a curve, so the best team will always be a 99 OVRQuote:
Originally Posted by SmoothPancakes
...it's also tied to specific ratings among players. Not an average.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwizzy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwizzy
Ah, alright. I was thinking they were on an average basis of the offense/defense/special teams scores, so that makes sense now. Still, some of those ratings are overrated as hell, especially on offense.Quote:
Originally Posted by JBHuskers
It is bad enough they have UGAg higher than my COCKS but to have clempson rated higher? :smh: How in the fudge did they come up with that? We have whipped them three years in a row?
Whoa UL is superunderated thats not right for a team shareing the big east title with a true fresman QB.
And well sure might as well overrate ohio state to keep they fans happy 20$ says their QB a 87+ even though if u ever watched him on tv. u wonder how the fuck he made it to the college level.
Kinda being mean on temple with 2 stars they got into a AQ confrence...
What RTARD gave wvu a 87 on Offence? 95+ I THINK
Cincy, UL, and rutgers 3 stars:fp: Each got at least a 4 star guy this year, rutgers got a 5.
Rutgers and pitt overrated on Offence both don't have a sure stating QB, and last year their starters were bad.
NCST kinda up their:confused:
UH sould be a 90+ on offence
Southern miss OMFG really?
How can any team that get bitchslapped 70-13 be rated higher than the team that bitchslapped them? Bowl game, smowl game, 70-13 is not a fuckin' fluke.Quote:
Originally Posted by SCClassof93
Do you guys ever rerate players in the game? like say a starting QB gets hurt and his back up turns out to be one of the best in the game. (oklahoma vs cincy tony pike)
Im talking about rerateing teams......... DEMO TIME TTYL
yeah, these ratings are weird. Funny thing is, UofL's ratings are right around where I'd thought they'd be. Hope we got a top 25 nod in the game .