Printable View
A certian user? I remember Jeffery Lumpkin at the after game party talking smack about that vaunted Alabama defense. I also remember a certian OLB making Tennessee is home afterwards.
Boy do I not miss that Alabama team...I am sure Texas isn't any less daunting, hopefully I will be able to find out soon.
I was thinking about that earlier today. With all the talk about how we weren't going to give Papa another Bama ... what the hell were we thinking giving him Texas? :D
Very good question, at least now there are a few other 6-star teams to contend with him.
I actually would be open to taking over Oregon. As much as I love my future Alma Mater, I can't stand my damn defense.Quote:
Originally Posted by Papa LoneStar
n/m. figured it out.
*cough*georgialsu*cough*Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneback
Actually....the biggest help for me during those first few years was that Tex took his favorite team instead of Florida....a better defense....and I probably would've lost my first user game during the first season.
I will enjoy this year's version MUCH better if I'm able to even get even an inch close to the run I had last year. I felt so dirty after January 2010 hit.
Crap....I knew it was gonna happen. Kingpin was on for a good amount earlier....now he's off....and psuexv is online....lol. Nothing worse than waiting to advance TO a bye week. I got plenty of practice today while fighting this cold (got it from my son who got it from my mother-n-law....first time sick since February 2009)....switched playbooks to get ready for some guys that I hope to get signed during this recruiting season.
Yes, but now we've got USC, Michigan, Ohio State (I think), Miami, Florida State and maybe Va Tech.Quote:
Originally Posted by Papa LoneStar
stop posting drunk fsuprime!
If you're talking 6-star, nope .... 5-star for me. Tried to be realistic to mid-90s OSU. We just weren't quite in that upper echelon.Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneback
The worst part of this year's game, to me, is that Texas and USC have ridiculous recruiting advantages. The combination of Pipeline and the love of the players at home puts them over the top. Ohio players are nothing to cough at either, but CA and TX have the advantage for sure.
EA needs to give us some sort of playbook creator. All I want to do is pick my formations and then put x number of already created plays into said formation. I get so frustrated looking for new playbooks.
agreed. I'm having a real hard time settling on one playbook this year.
Me, too....I wish Fluff E Bunny did that playbook search tool this year....never know how great something is until it's gone
yea, i wish his optimism for FSUs football team this year would carry over to the video game lol
Meh. You can do just about everything you could do in Fluff's tool (in fact, more because of flexibility) with G's playbook spreadsheet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Papa LoneStar
Check out this statline from my 2011 Ohio State dynasty:
J. Bauserman (subbing for an injured Pryor): 8-8, 185 yards, 5 TDs
D. Posey: 7 rec, 186 yards, 5 TDs
I guess I need to play with it....that's how I found Fresno State's playbook....but I was looking for all playbooks with Ace, Ace Twin TE, I-formation (with regular HB slam), a 5-wide shotgun set, and shotgun ace or playbooks with that has at least 4 out of my 5 favorites that way I could go through 'em all and find the one that makes me smile the most.
im taking a class in excel next semester, i have never use it ;/
Well, the only thing there that Fluff's search tool would give you is "with HB Slam". However, he was basing that off of VGChartz's file last year, and to say they had some problems would be an understatement.
As for the rest of it ... go here. I could probably come up with the exact string you're looking for, but it'll take me some thinking.
Hey Snoop, was the #1 ATH last year Justin Heard? The name sounds right, and his ratings look right on ND's roster ...
80 OVR FB.
That would be him and the position is what I thought he might be. I probably should have taken him last year as I need a FB but I was a little worried to say the least. Nice find.Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffHCross
apparently 5 wr is unstoppable now with new patch/tuner set, anyone tried it yet?
I have not, but I am sure I will see it quite a bit when playing Notre Dame tonight.
Please if everyone can get on and play around a little and let me know what you think of all the sliders. From some of the pass defense issues I am going to do some slider tweaking after my game tonight.
Depends, did you hear that from Rhombic? Because I'm pretty sure he's been claiming that since day 1.Quote:
Originally Posted by fsuprime
5 WR is always unstoppable on certain routes ... there's no defense in the game that will match up against 5 WRs.
I didn't even think about FB. He was so low rated in everything they show for ATH, I didn't see anything that he could be.Quote:
Originally Posted by psusnoop
i read it from him, and on this sites forum to, basically man defense has been nerfed back to 2009 lolQuote:
Originally Posted by JeffHCross
( eyeroll )
The only thing I've seen posted about Man Defense was from him. Now, I was playing the CPU, not HUM, and I barely saw any difference in man defense. Considering I was playing a top 10 team, I was expecting a much bigger challenge.
yea thats why i was asking here about it, i have not been able to play yet, i have a game vs OU in a different OD so ill know how user v user is tonight or tomorrow
Damn how I go from 11-2, to 0-4....
*cough*Oregon*cough*
Well now it's 0-5 thanks to you lol.
For the record, Kingpin, I don't think you can actually get fired in an OD. My job approval has never been out of the red, and was almost 0 last season.
I was hypothetically speaking, since I'll make a request to take over Oregon at the end of the season. I just wanted to give a back story if it's approved ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffHCross
fine with me, their defense is probably worse off (base roster wise) than my auburn D was last year
Based on what I saw last night, anybody who says man defense is nerfed is clearly on something, or just looking for something to raise an issue about. I'm sure there are certain plays (5 WR in particular) that break it. But man defense itself is doing just fine.Quote:
Originally Posted by fsuprime
Snoop and I had a play last night where his CB literally led my WR on an out route by about 3 yards ... and, of course, was in perfect position to pick the ball.
The one thing I've noticed the last few weeks is that speed/agility/"fast" players seem to be at a premium on the defensive side. I don't know which rating it is (I would suspect a combination of all three), but there is a pronounced difference in the coverage performance of my Buckeyes and the other teams I'm playing. I would largely attribute this to the ratings, since I probably leaned on the conservative side when creating my team. Plus I know my defenders are slower than most of this year's college players.
That highlight was just sick. I swear CB Morris was the one running the route. Everyone should check that out when they get a chance.
I really wanted to post that deep curl route TD but of course I couldn't. GRR.....
Man I wish I had corners like that. I get beat up on man coverage. I place some of this on the fact that I am starting two Sophomore CBs though.... at least I hope that's it.
yea i had my game (fsu @ ou 2010)user v user last night with luvtotha9s newest rosters...OUs DBs were still leading my WRs a good bit and my CBs who are not as good were still in decent position, the game saw 9 interceptions lol (this was also on heisman though, not sure if that affects anything).Quote:
Based on what I saw last night, anybody who says man defense is nerfed is clearly on something, or just looking for something to raise an issue about. I'm sure there are certain plays (5 WR in particular) that break it. But man defense itself is doing just fine.
Snoop and I had a play last night where his CB literally led my WR on an out route by about 3 yards ... and, of course, was in perfect position to pick the ball.
The one thing I've noticed the last few weeks is that speed/agility/"fast" players seem to be at a premium on the defensive side. I don't know which rating it is (I would suspect a combination of all three), but there is a pronounced difference in the coverage performance of my Buckeyes and the other teams I'm playing. I would largely attribute this to the ratings, since I probably leaned on the conservative side when creating my team. Plus I know my defenders are slower than most of this year's college players.
Texas DBs were also leading my receivers a lot, but I really noticed it when Papa used the Play the Pass strategy also.
Yeah I can't stand when the DB's know your routes from the snap where they are running it for you
Hence me making the statement last season that man coverage is garbage. if ran 90% of the time