Fair enough.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk 2
One thing I am noticing is way too many broken tackles by WR's and QB's in the open field on safeties and LB's. They shed them off like they are about 150lbs.
delete
personally myself, i see hardly any changes to last years release, same ole problems they had last year and couldn't fix, what did they do all year ? or are we suppose to just hand over our money again and have a game that's broke , same as last year, it was basically, well, we can't fix this without messing up something else, so ur SOL. We got our money , you just got screwed with a broken game. even the stadium lights don't work for most night games, they come on here and there only in sections, quite annoying. i gave them another chance, but this will be it for me , this stuff is uncalled for, they had a year to fix this stuff and most of it is still the same .
I presume all the "critic" reviews are in and NCAA 13 comes in with a 75. (Last year 12 got an 82)
http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-...aa-football-13
http://www.metacritic.com/game/plays...aa-football-12
The PS3 side is an 83.
http://www.metacritic.com/game/plays...aa-football-13
Yes, but as with most games, most reviewers do their reviews on the 360 side, so it's essentially the same thing. Joystiq and Gamespot gave it a 60 and 65 respectively and those scores haven't even been added to the PS3 side yet.
It was interesting to see that even with all the discounts, going into the last week before release, this year's version had almost 100,000 less preorders across the 360/PS3 than '12 did...at least according to VG.
In Gamespot's case, it looks like the review is only official for the 360.
Speaking of Gamespot though:
How does that line fit in a review with a score of a 65? :D (Actually, upon reading the rest of the review, it makes perfect sense. It was still jarring to see though. I was expecting a very critical review with a 65 score)Quote:
Thankfully, once you move away from the Heisman Challenge and into the more team-focused modes, the action is as good as ever.
I think that's true of all series, but sports titles get the brunt of the impact because they're one of the few year over year series. There are several series I can think of where I enjoyed edition X, but didn't enjoy X+1 or X+2, and so haven't given them a shot since.
Or you just don't want to buy it again the very next year. I bought FIFA 10 and NHL 11, and while I played the hell out of both and enjoyed both, I didn't feel like spending the money on FIFA 11 or 12 or NHL 12. I'm gonna get both NHL 13 and FIFA 13 this year, but the last couple years for each, I haven't had any desire to buy when I was still playing and enjoying the previous year's. NCAA is the only sports game that I am willing to buy each year, the rest, I'll buy once every other or every couple years.
I'd say the game should get a higher rating than it did. To me, the changes are subtle and not whack-you-in-the-face wow improvements, but the gameplay changes that have been made make the game more enjoyable so far than '12.
The reviews are pretty clear on how much influence the visuals have on the reviewers. Lots of comments about the presentation being "stale". Oh, and Heisman Challenge being, well, not at all a game changer.
I've played 3 games on 360 so far and I've been shake blitzed every single one of them. What the hell? Does EVERYONE know how to do it? It's especially annoying since I want to try to run my legitimate offense and I can't because about the only thing you can do against the shake blitz is get in a 2 back set, set up max protect, and bomb the shit out of them down field. Ugh, so lame.
Yeah, sure...I was going to last week but I completely forgot.
I feel you on that shake blitzed. those lbs or cbs come free and you can't run anything on offense. I just post a game on youtube, I play last night against someone that did that to me all game.