You do realize that the NFL made week 17 all divisional games to try and eliminate meaningless games at the end of the season, right? Some team is ALWAYS going to win their division week 17.
Printable View
You do realize that the NFL made week 17 all divisional games to try and eliminate meaningless games at the end of the season, right? Some team is ALWAYS going to win their division week 17.
The drama in the Chiefs/Texans game is yawn-inducing.
Steelers whooping that ass.
NFL 0-2 today. Do better, writers.
every game is a chapter.Quote:
Originally Posted by souljahbill
but yeah,you believe all the crap that happened the last 5 minutes...?
you do realize theres no way in hell those games mean anything if anyone actually lead their division by two or three games but somehow the league is just so lucky it doesnt happen that way.Quote:
Originally Posted by souljahbill
Do you possess any critical thinking skills at all?
There are 8 divisions. Do you really think that a few won't be competitive and come down to the end? The odds of having all 8 divisions sewed up are way too low for that to happen ever happen. It would be an anomaly for it to happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
So yeah, not only do I have critical thinking, I understand statistics so I win.
Quote:
Originally Posted by souljahbill
Winner winner!
Lol. You guys are going to sit there and believe that the kicker made all those kicks and then blows it at point blank range wide to the left?
You're fools for the WWE/ NFL.
What this tells me is GB vs KC might be what they're leading too
1) Laces outQuote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
2) You're the fool.
3) Neither team is making the Super Bowl. Try again.
Yet you said Seattle would lose because that's what the NFL wants. Don't spin this on us and play both sides. You were wrong again!Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
He's never wrong!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by baseballplyrmvp
Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
I'll stick with Steelers vs Green Bay for now.
lets run down the list here:
the team that won-Seattle, was missing the Great Starting RB, 2 tight ends, and failed going on 4th down 3 or 4 times, gets their biggest play on a botched snap of their own doing...and still wins? bullshit.
the team that lost hit all its semi long range field goals but cant hit from point blank range wide to the left...? bullshit (they also destroyed the myth that laces need to be out because he made both in and out lace shots)
but you will continue to buy all the fantastic finishes......
next week I'm going with:
Packers
Steelers
Chiefs
Seahawks
its quite possible they could have Pats win next week..but I think they want to tease with a Super Bowl I rematch
No no ram. You cannot pick the Seahawks because you said that they wouldn't make the Seahawks. Then they'd lose to the Vikings. You have to stick with picking against them.
Maybe Seattle won because they held the leagues top rusher to only 40-some yards rushing? Also Seattle didn't convert a couple 3rd and mediums in the 4th quarter. Had they converted those, especially on their last drive, the Vikings wouldn't have gotten the ball back and would've never been in a position to kick the gw field goal.
All road teams. Yeah, that'll happen.
And a "rematch" of a game that happened 50 years ago. What a great story! Maybe Bart Starr will be at media day too!
Arizona wins
New England wins
The other 2 games are toss-ups but I think Carolina has a better shot at beating Seattle than Denver has at beating Pittsburgh.
You KNOW Seattle would lose in the first round, huh? And that Minnesota would be in the conference championship?Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson
Just goes to show that you don't know shit. Eat your crow, moron.
yeah Soulja,tell us how he cant do this on purpose..
https://media.giphy.com/media/xT77XF...QZeU/giphy.gif
its too blatant here,far too blatant
It's not blatant at all.https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...c28775f1d8.jpg
yes,we've already established you dont know when you are being lied to.Quote:
It's not blatant at all.
lol the only thing you can do is post the definition of blatant? you are completely confused and dont know how to react or respond.
http://ftw.usatoday.com/2016/01/pacm...burgh-steelers
blatant.Quote:
Pacman Jones, a player who should be thankful every day that he came of age in the NFL of the mid 2000s rather than the mid 2010s, lest he have been Roger Goodell’s first poster child for what happens when you can’t keep yourself out of trouble, is still chirping about his and Vontaze Burfict’s wild-card meltdown, making grand claims to Dan Patrick that Antonio Brown faked his injury on the play that started the Bengals collapse, Antonio Brown winked at him during said injury and that Antonio Brown deserves an award for the whole thing. I assume he’s going to go on Colin Cowherd later and implicate Brown in the Kennedy assassination.
“I know he was faking. Go back and look at the play. If you look in slow motion of the play, you tell me that Vontaze hit him in the head or did his should pad barely touch him (emphasis his).’
Brown got up right after. Nothing is wrong with him.
and of Course Roethlisburger comes back into the game for the win and the WWE penalties start flying