Michigan:
Offense: Toledo
Defense: 4-3
Printable View
Michigan:
Offense: Toledo
Defense: 4-3
:Wisconsin:
Offense - Northwestern
Defense - 3-3-5
Going to try out the 3-3-5 to start the season but if I decide I don't like it as much as I want to, I'll switch to a 3-4... I'll post here if I change.
FSU
Offense: Ole Miss
Defense: Multiple D (switching from 4-3 i have used the last 2 years)
Oklahoma
Offense: Undecided, between Ohio State and Oklahoma
Defense: Multiple D
The Texas Longhorns
Offense: Stanford (switchin from Alabama)
Defense: Multiple D (4-3 base....switching from 4-3)
Clemson Tigers
Offensive: TCU
Defensive: 4-2-5
Penn State
Offense- Penn State
Defense- 4-3
USC
Offense - USC
Defense - 4-3
:Miami:
Offense : Bama
defenes: 4-3
Virginia Tech
Offense: Virginia Tech
Defense: Multiple D
:Oregon:
Offense: Georgia Tech or Navy or the Option Run. (I got 2 more CPU games to figure out a sure choice)
Defense: 3-4
Interesting choice there Kingpin, I understand why though with those two running backs.
It's going to be a bit tough with my Oline, but I think we're talented enough to get some decent rushing yards. I wanted to do a Shotgun based option team, but I just wasn't getting any good runs in.
Kinda ironic considering everything ... but Kingpin, you might want to take a look at Air Force. I haven't played with them this year, but in past years it gave me the strengths of running the Bone but the flexibility to run other sets as needbe.
I'll look into it. I did want one that had a bit more than just the Bone offense. I'll see how a full game looks with GT, then play my next CPU game with Air Force, so hopefully I'll have a set book for Penn State.
It would be funny if that ended being my permanent playbook though.
nm, changed my mind...
:D :D :D :D :DQuote:
Originally Posted by oneback
No idea what that's for ... but yeah ...
I had posted that I was changing to the Florida State playbook as my offense was pretty stagnant against Clemson, then I watched the first quarter yesterday morning and wondered why I kept trying to bang into a brick wall and run against 8 and 9 man fronts. Then in the passing game there were quite a few reads I as missing so I decided to stick with Boston College.
Alright, everyone probably knew it was coming but I am switching playbooks, just not sure which one yet. The leader in the clubhouse is Florida State however.
Edit: I am tired of looking at playbooks, I am going to go with North Carolina's the same one I used all of last year...despite its lack of shotgun formations.
Color me shocked ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneback
In a twist of irony, I actually decided to stick with the Air Force playbook. My offense seemed to like that one the most.
g, are you still using the 335 or did you decide on the switch to the 34?
Still using the 3-3-5... I'm still learning it, especially when playing against a HUM opponent but I like some of the things I can do with it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneback
I dibbled a little bit with the 335 against Kingpin and it was quite effective in run defense but I was bringing it almost everytime I called it. I mixed a little zone but mostly man Cover 1 blitzes against him and James. James is a freak in this game.
.
Offense: AlabamaQuote:
Originally Posted by Papa LoneStar
Defense: Multiple D
I've finished my User vs User games for the season (barring a Bowl matchup), however I'm playing around with different playbooks in preparation for next season. If I get a HUM opponent, I'll be sure to update.
Just had a thought ... for sake of sanity, people who change their playbooks should probably go back to the first post and edit to somehow to indicate they changed. What I did was insert a link to the new post into my first one.
Offense: Stanford
Defense: Multiple D
Offense: Idaho
Defense: 3-3-5
.
*cough*....pardon meQuote:
Originally Posted by Papa LoneStar
Offense: Pittsburgh
Defense: Multiple D
*shoutout to G and that wonderful spread sheet
Oh man, I do miss the Pitt book. Bread and butter last year.
Michigan has switched playbooks (big surprise).
Offense: Air Force
Defense: 4-3
:Oregon:
Offense: Michigan
Defense: 3-4
This may come back to haunt me, but I liked Michigan's playbook after playing a few games with them.
I decided to go with Nevada's playbook.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingpin32
I hate to suggest this since I'll have to face it but have you looked at the Wake Forest playbook? Lots of great option looks including a Wishbone formation and quite a bit of I-Form options.Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneback
Clemson Tigers
Offensive: Tulsa
Defensive: 4-2-5
Air Force and Wake Forest were the two playbooks I narrowed it down to, I just like some of the plays in the Air Force book a little better. I still pray for a playbook/play creator next year.Quote:
Originally Posted by gschwendt