JeffHCross
10-15-2014, 09:56 AM
While I respect the tradition of the Big Ten's place in the Rose Bowl, it seems unbalanced to me that the B1G and Pac-12 champions can be reasonably assumed to meet in the Rose Bowl more often than not, while the SEC champion can be reasonably assumed to play a CPU team in their bowl every season. I realize that bowls are a crapshoot anyway, and user teams could potentially be paired up all over the schedule, so I thought I'd put it to a vote.
If we voted to make a change, either we'd have to leave one conference At Large or swap a current team with the Big Ten. My preference would be to send the Big Ten to the Fiesta Bowl. I think it could be interesting to send the Big XII champion to the Sugar Bowl (thus creating the current setup for the "Champions Bowl"), or just set all CPU conferences to At-Large so we could get some interesting BCS matchups.
If we voted to make a change, either we'd have to leave one conference At Large or swap a current team with the Big Ten. My preference would be to send the Big Ten to the Fiesta Bowl. I think it could be interesting to send the Big XII champion to the Sugar Bowl (thus creating the current setup for the "Champions Bowl"), or just set all CPU conferences to At-Large so we could get some interesting BCS matchups.