Powerhouse Career Stats

[ryby6969]

Mid-Season of 2016:


Passing:Minimum of 150 attempts and ranked by passer rating.



Player Name

Team

Rating

Yards

TD

Int

YPG

Comp%



1. C.Hodges-RSJr

LSU

214.5

6137

59

32

236.0

65



2. S.Young-Sr

LSU

210.9

2627

27

15

61.0

63



3. D.Anderson-RSSo

Bama

203.9

4367

52

18

256.8

68



4. G.Kiel-RSSr

ND

203.7

2186

21

7

121.4

75



5. L.McNeal-RSJr

tOSU

198.0

4946

51

27

206.0

66



6. C.Brewer-RSSr

Tex

187.7

2291

22

13

127.2

69



7. J.Overstreet-RSSr

Tex

184.4

2081

19

12

138.7

67



8. K.Jones-Sr

Mich

178.3

6060

55

29

195.4

67



9. J.Humphrey-Jr

Or

173.0

1888

17

12

99.3

64



10. A.Morris-RSSr

Bama

172.9

1764

12

7

176.4

66





Rushing:



Player Name

Team

Yards

Avg.

TD's

YPG

YAC

Fumbles



1. J.Marks-RSJr(HB)

Mich

2671

5.8

25

95.3

856

4



2. M.Pender-RSSr(HB)

FSU

1993

5.6

21

49.8

609

3



3. M.Davis-RSSr(QB)

TAMU

1660

7.6

23

51.8

419

11



4. D.Terrell-RSJr(QB)

FSU

1549

10.1

18

91.1

368

3



5. K.Jones-Sr(QB)

Mich

1434

4.7

25

46.2

436

11



6. A.Bratton-RSJr(QB)

USC

1418

7.7

13

47.2

428

2



7. J.Colbert-RSJr(HB)

LSU

1278

5.2

17

44.0

472

1



8. S.Young-Sr(QB)

LSU

1245

5.0

23

28.9

309

10



9. J.Overstreet-RSSr(QB)

Tex

1092

6.6

13

72.7

225

7



10. D.Bell-RSSo(HB)

Bama

1028

5.9

16

54.1

217

2




Interesting that so many QB's are in the rushing leaders. User teams are SOOOO far behind the cpu teams in rushing it is not even funny.

[ryby6969]

Receiving:



Player Name

Team

Yards

Rec

Avg.

TD's

YPG

Drops



1. B.Hunter-Sr(TE)

LSU

3095

158

19.5

31

71.9

9



2. K.Hatcher-RSSr(WR)

Ark

3029

124

24.4

31

79.7

10



3. C.Jones-RSSr(WR)

Tex

2358

118

19.9

22

56.1

16



4. E.Williams-RSSr(WR)

Bama

2193

130

16.8

20

59.2

12



5. B.Rice-So(WR)

LSU

2120

70

30.2

27

124.7

3



6. D.Dean-RSSr(TE)

Ark

2033

134

15.1

15

47.2

5



7. J.Parker-Jr(WR)

tOSU

1916

82

23.3

18

66.0

8



8. D.Neal-RSSr(WR)

ND

1710

91

18.7

20

46.2

7



9. T.Gurley-RSSr(WR)

UGA

1568

99

15.8

18

60.3

4



10. B.Stephens-RSJr(WR)

Tex

1429

66

21.6

14

49.2

4





Defense:



Player Name

Team

Tackles



1.T.Allen-RSJr(MLB)

Bama

220



2. M.Clemons-Sr(MLB)

tOSU

157



3. C.King-RSJr(MLB)

Tex

131



4. K.Moore-Sr(CB)

TAMU

126



5. M.McDonald-RSJr(SS)

tOSU

124



6. M.Jones-Sr(OLB)

Or

114



7. S.McDowell-Sr(SS)

ND

114



8. K.Banks-Sr(FS)

tOSU

112



9. N.Jones-Jr(OLB)

TAMU

108



10. S.Starr-RSSr(MLB)

USC

100




This is just solo tackles.

[ryby6969]

Defense: Tackles For Loss



Player Name

Team

TFL



1. T.Allen-RSJr(MLB)

Bama

82



2. E.Owen-RSJr(DE)

LSU

64



3. M.Clemons-Sr(MLB)

tOSU

54



4. M.Jones-Sr(OLB)

Or

53



5. K.Brown-Sr(MLB)

Mich

52



6. M.Edwards-RSSr(DT)

FSU

49



7. S.Starr-RSSr(MLB)

USC

44



8. C.King-RSJr(MLB)

Tex

40



9. C.Casher-RSSr(DE)

FSU

39



10. W.Chase-Jr(OLB)

Tex

38





Defense: Sacks



Player Name

Team

Sacks



1. E.Owen-RSJr(DE)

LSU

55



2. M.Edwards-RSSr(DT)

FSU

26.5



3. J.Thompson-Sr(DE)

TAMU

20.5



4. C.Casher-RSSr(DE)

FSU

20



5. S.Pittman-RSSr(DE)

tOSU

18.5



6. O.Pipkins-RSSr(DT)

Mich

18



7. T.Beanum-Sr(DE)

Ark

18



8. S.Starr-RSSr(MLB)

USC

18



9. M.Jones-Sr(OLB)

Or

17.5



10. T.Shaw-Sr(DE)

Bama

17





Defense: Int's


Player Name

Team

Int's



1. G.Jones-Sr(CB)

LSU

19



2. A.Robinson-Jr(CB)

tOSU

17



3. D.Nichols-Sr(CB)

UGA

14



4. N.Jones-Sr(OLB)

TAMU

13



5. J.Gandy-Sr(CB)

Bama

12



6. H.Martin-Sr(CB)

ND

10



7. J.Lowe-RSJr(CB)

FSU

10



8. T.Campbell-Jr(CB)

USC

9



9. J.Carter-Jr(CB)

Mich

9



10. M.Graham-RSJr(FS)

LSU

9




I looked at the OL and TAMU had a LT with 54 Pancakes and the next closest user was thirty something. I may look at them closer later.

[texacotea]

55 sacks? thats crazy

[ryby6969]

He has 28 already this season and is #2 in the Heisman race now. :D

[JeffHCross]

Papa's a stat whore :D


Interesting that so many QB's are in the rushing leaders. User teams are SOOOO far behind the cpu teams in rushing it is not even funny.Uhm ... #2 and #7 in rushing :D It's going to be close between me and Navy for the lead at the end of the year.

[ryby6969]

I am talking about career stats Jeff. Cpu teams are at like 6,000 yards if I remember correctly. I had to scroll down quite a ways to get to Marks.

[ryby6969]

Added player positions in the rushing category per request, let me know if there is anything else you guys would like to see.

[psuexv]

Added player positions in the rushing category per request, let me know if there is anything else you guys would like to see.

I'd say add positions to all categories. Some of the INT guys may be LBs and the sacks one could be a mix of DL and LBs

[gschwendt]

Player year?

[psuexv]

Player year?

:+1:

[Oneback]

I am talking about career stats Jeff. Cpu teams are at like 6,000 yards if I remember correctly. I had to scroll down quite a ways to get to Marks.

I think the biggest thing there is that the CPU will always start the higher rated, older player where that isn't always true to users. I'm starting a freshmen this season, my other leading rusher, Jalen Overstreet, rode the bench early on, finally got on the field last year and got hurt for most of the season. If you look at my rushing stats this season they are spread amoungst 5 players: 2 QB's and 3 HB's

[ryby6969]

Done

[ryby6969]

I think the biggest thing there is that the CPU will always start the higher rated, older player where that isn't always true to users. I'm starting a freshmen this season, my other leading rusher, Jalen Overstreet, rode the bench early on, finally got on the field last year and got hurt for most of the season. If you look at my rushing stats this season they are spread amoungst 5 players: 2 QB's and 3 HB's

I also think a major reason is the fact that we have recruited guys that were already better as Freshmen then the default Fresh and Soph on the original rosters so they have not really had the carries. I know Yeldon is a RSSr and only rated a 91 so he is riding the bench for a more dynamic RSSo. I will be interested to see in a few seasons how it looks after we have nothing but our own recruits and they have gotten some playing time.

[Oneback]

I also think a major reason is the fact that we have recruited guys that were already better as Freshmen then the default Fresh and Soph on the original rosters so they have not really had the carries. I know Yeldon is a RSSr and only rated a 91 so he is riding the bench for a more dynamic RSSo. I will be interested to see in a few seasons how it looks after we have nothing but our own recruits and they have gotten some playing time.

Completely agree, there was a clear difference in the way they rate recruits and the default roster. On the default roster I had several top rated freshman (rivals top 10 at their position) that were easily passed by recruits.

[ryby6969]

Completely agree, there was a clear difference in the way they rate recruits and the default roster. On the default roster I had several top rated freshman (rivals top 10 at their position) that were easily passed by recruits.

Yeah, I vote that if it is the same case for 14 we wait a little longer for a decent set of named rosters with adjustments to the Freshmen.

[Oneback]

Yeah, I vote that if it is the same case for 14 we wait a little longer for a decent set of named rosters with adjustments to the Freshmen.

The problem wasn't really where they were rated, although that played a part, but it seemed as though their ceiling was lower. I've seen recruits go from 78 OVR to mid to high 80's the next year then finish in the mid to high 90's. Whereas some of the default roster guys are still in the mid 80's OVR as a RSSr.

[ryby6969]

Well Cooper and Yeldon were both rated in the low 70's on the default, as was Duke Johnson and Tracey Howard for the U. There were only a few teams whose Freshmen were rated well. Compare that to top rated guys at each position in the recruiting class coming in at low 80's, there is virtually no chance for those guys to get any playing time.

[Papa LoneStar]

55 sacks? thats crazy


He has 28 already this season and is #2 in the Heisman race now. :D


Papa's a stat whore :D


:nod:....and now he has 32 this season after getting 4 vs A&M :))

[Escobar]

Yeah, I vote that if it is the same case for 14 we wait a little longer for a decent set of named rosters with adjustments to the Freshmen.

I hate using rosters with adjustments to the freshman, because it is all subjective at that point. There's not really a way to pinpoint what kind of impact a freshman will have on the field. If they adjust the true freshmen, they might as well do the same for the redshirt freshmen. Look at how Manziel was rated on the default roster...

[JeffHCross]

Fair point, though any roster with any adjustments is subjective. Also, to the idea that default Freshmen didn't progress, Mario Edwards was a default Freshmen, now 99 OVR, even with a position change. Eddie something-or-another, another DT, transferred from me to UConn and is now 94 OVR. I'd have the two highest rated DTs in the game if Eddie had stayed.

Though to the overall point, default Freshmen have always been underrated compared to recruits. Always.

[ryby6969]

The problem is with what OB said. When you have players that are top 10 at their position and they are rated low 70's but then the new recuits come in rated 10 points higher already. Most freshman on the default rosters have been useless minus a select few. They need to get the new recruits in line with the default rosters.

[JeffHCross]

It's a problem of consistency. I don't think either Edwards or Eddie were low 70s on the roster we started with. But, yes, there are plenty that are. It's part of a larger problem of how the roster are designed, in my personal opinion.