Yes
No
You group all the picks into one while I spread it out. It's another perspective.
I said I homered some picks, mostly USC and fucla, not that I'm a homer altogether. Based on the practice reports and what I read from insiders, I expected things to go differently.
Being objective does not mean being smarter. It's keeping the bias out of your picks. Picking bias free doesn't raise your IQ any. It doesn't make you smarter than me.
I do have a college degree. It's not in designing socks like yours but in engineering.
Chicago-Green Bay===
yeah, they blame the weather and neither team can get anything going the first half...and refs constintly making calls to push teams back in the redzone that are very questionable.
all the sudden with 2 minutes left both teams easily score in a matter of seconds. All necessary balls are caught,no defenders in the way etc.
did you see that Jeffries dropped ball bullcrap? the ball was caught but he turns one hand away from the ball and just drops it lol so they call it incomplete. Its because those gloves make it so easy to catch a ball they have to now say you have to hold a ball for a couple seconds or they dont call it a catch...but you of course will never question the ridiculous crap
Where did I say blowouts werent staged games? blowouts arent boring as long as you are the fan rooting for the particular team. I know Romo's injury is fake like all his injuries the last two years as well.
blowouts dont nullify the fact theres too many unrealistic close finishes.
every offensive lineman was on the injury report for Packers before tonight's game but miracle of miracles, the game comes down to a final play with 30 seconds left.
that is fabricated,artificial, unnatural drama no matter how you try to defend it. ...and the Green bay receiver purposely dropping the ball in the end zone.
but everyone picked Green Bay and I picked Chicago because I knew they wanted to bunch up the division and give Minnesota an edge..and you can usually count on division teams having a 1-1 split.
I bought the Dallas hype...I still expect them to play spoiler. Smooth didnt buy the hype and he and I are the only 2-1 finishers today.
I'm not partial to blonds but...
First, yes, blowouts are boring regardless. I've turned off many Broncos games when they've turned into blowouts, win or lose, because it's boring as shit.
Second, I assume you have actual physical medical proof to back up that claim? "I know it is" ain't gonna fly no more. You wanna claim that someone is faking an injury, you better have actual physical proof from now on.
He then tortures them by explaining how the NFL is fixed, until they can no longer stand the rantings of a madman and plead for death. So he bashes them over the head and dumps them in a river. Oregon has plenty of rivers. With California drying up, I now understand why he moved up North.
all you are saying is 'you know it is' as well. All you saw was a guy fall to the ground and stay there. He didnt look in much pain either. You rely on faith that he is injured.
. Theres no such thing as the onus is on me as opposed to you. Thats just a childish counter argument that someone heard and mimics.
you need to learn the difference between your perception and actual reality.
So ram, since you claim all injuries are fake, how do you explain this?
Does Jeremy lane have a rubber arm? Or did Dumbledore magically remove the bones from his arm?
You are, with a doubt, one of the biggest internet idiots of all time. You may be the GOAT at internet trolling.
1) The onus IS on you. YOU have the dissenting voice. The Cowboys, who have FIRSTHAND knowledge are saying he's hurt and yet somehow, you, some dude on a computer, are saying they're lying. Well, genius, this is the part where you prove your case and SHOW everyone that the Cowboys are lying. But you can't. You can't prove anything. You've NEVER proven anything. And for you to say there's no onus on you, that somehow Smooth (or anyone) has to prove to you just shows how disconnected from reality you are. Our whole system of justice and science is based on proof. YOU have the dissenting opinion so YOU have to prove your case. You'd make a TERRIBLE prosecutor.
Bookmarks