yes,you are right...first time back ups shouldnt win games. It should make you question things.Trust your own judgement.Originally Posted by JBHuskers
Yes
No
yes,you are right...first time back ups shouldnt win games. It should make you question things.Trust your own judgement.
LOL cognitive dissonance is a horrible disease. He's a past NFL player who became a writer and he just told you what they were told in a nfl meeting.
I hate to brake this to you but thats not any form of a counter argument.So you have no football knowledge but i'm the one who doesnt know what he's talking about because I get more picks right?
You are still trying to say that i've been nothing but lucky consistently for 10 weeks?
People have in fact told me here that I know nothing about football. That implies They have more football knowledge.
You are right to a degree. I dont have to know anything about football. I just need to associate it with a typical movie or tv show plot as to what the public wants to see and I'll usually be right.
We are not and have NEVER argued about football knowledge. No one cares what methods anyone uses to make picks.
The debate is about whether games are staged.
@Smooth
I love you too. Happy Thanksgiving !
and the field work with my picks is good circumstantial evidence.
then why is what you consider a false method working for me?No one cares what methods anyone uses to make picks
Field work?
Once again. no one cares about the method in which you make picks. You can draw names out of a hat and be successful. That is NOT the argument.
The argument is whether games are staged. Games being staged and how you make your picks are 2 different things. It's sad though that you think there's a correlation between the two.
For the record ram, in the 120 picks that we've made in the college pickem, I've only picked 10 more games incorrectly than what you have. So you are not way better at picking than what I am. You have a lot more points because I homered some picks at high confidence and got them wrong.
You are also pointing out that I'm smart enough to arrange the point system so it works in my favor. I have a better idea which games are doubtful.
actually, since we all know the same general knowledge about who's good or who isnt..10 games adds up to you getting an entire week wrong,50 points...which is a lot.
( just some competitive male banteri'm not being mean )
Happy Thanksgiving! Be safe
then do it and prove it. Intellectually thats a moronic statement to begin with and you know it
hey college educated guy,pay attention. If i'm getting picks right based on the direction I think they want to go,that means i'm doing more than just looking at each individual match up on its own. I'm seeing how each team and game affects the other i've been right numorous times picking teams everyone assumed was the underdog,while still staying in the top 2.I'm not picking who I think I would pick, or I would be in the middle of the bunch with the rest of you. You cant do that randomly out of a hat. You cant just get lucky 10 weeks in a row or pick names 10 weeks in a row to be successful.
dude,seriously, think about what you just said.
from another fan forum
This all the way! Been watching the NFL for 32+yrs now and today for the 1st time ever I'm considering letting this sport go. It really has nothing to do with the loss last night but, with how stupid and dictating the zebra clowns have become the last few years destroying numerous games league wide. Every thing just seems or appears way, way too scripted.
NFL = Vegas WWE??? I heard this for along time and thought whatever. This year has really opened my eyes to the possibility it's rigged directly through the REFS.
Was shocked to read this from the Boston Globe actually about last nights game. Some fans and now media outlets are starting to wake up.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/20...aJM/story.html
Are you really this stupid?
NO
ONE
CARES
ABOUT
YOUR
PICKS.
Your picks, DO NOT, IN ANYWAY, PROVE that games are staged. The argument IS NOT about "football knowledge." It IS NOT about your dumb ass methodology.
The argument is about whether games are staged. Once again,
YOUR
PROCESS
FOR
PICKING
GAMES
DOES
NOT
PROVE
GAMES
ARE
STAGED.
STOP trying to correlate your picks with your theory because as someone who actually studied how statistics work, in multiple classes, in college, there is NO correlation between your picks and proving your point.
On the other hand, MULTIPLE PEOPLE with FIRSTHAND knowledge have said that your theory is dumb and idiotic and somehow, YOU discredit them/us but some wackado you found on the internet is credible and reliable source even though he hasn't shown a shred of evidence either.
In addition to random whackadoos, don't forget random ass unknown people on random ass fan sites and other forums. As shown by Douchecanoe's newest post, clearly those people are instantly 100% believable but anyone who speaks against his belief, even those who actually played and coached in the fucking NFL, well, they're just lying bastards.
And over the 12 weeks we've been picking, 10 games is less than 1 a week, which isn't very much. You're not smarter about the whole ranking thing, just more objective. I've homered quite a few USC and fucla picks.You are also pointing out that I'm smart enough to arrange the point system so it works in my favor. I have a better idea which games are doubtful.
actually, since we all know the same general knowledge about who's good or who isnt..10 games adds up to you getting an entire week wrong,50 points...which is a lot.
( just some competitive male banter
Happy Thanksgiving! Be safe
theres 10 games a week. That counts as a whole week.You just said you are a homer and I'm objective,therefore I'm not the smarter one? seriously? you just said? I suppose you are going to tell me you have a college degree too?
just to reiterate: you picked a team based on emotionally liking it. I picked a team based on whether I think they win or not regardless of favoritism and I was right more often. Which is the objective of the event.Yes, I would have to say that makes me smarter
I just quoted a fans view. I didnt say it proved anything? You posting an ex player making a comment for 60 seconds with no in depth explanation does not qualify as any form of a counter point. You are telling me that if you asked your kid if he did the dishes, you would believe him with out looking. With no solid evidence what so ever. Believing a guy making a comment on tv is the same principle. AND I debunked your stupid -I asked a coach/trainer story- quite thoroughly, 3 or 4 times.
furthermore, a guy on a pro pro-sports station is making a comment positive towards the people who pay him because if he didnt he'd get fired.
you seriously have no critical thinking skills to speak of. You are having faith in nothing more than a few quotes while I have done 2 years of research. You said you could get multiple picks right just randomly guessing. You know its one of the more ridiculous things you've said.
You show a early morning show quickie comment of a guy reading a stupid twitter comment and just acting disgusted like a popular kid in school going " dude, thats just wrong man, you dont know what you are talking about man"...and thats some form of proof?
I show you an ex player who said all players were told in a meeting "you are entertainers and you win or lose as needed". whether you believe it or not, it looks my guy has a more well thought out response from first hand experience
Last edited by ram29jackson; 11-25-2015 at 08:51 PM.
You didn't debunk anything, clown. You can't debunk the truth.
Everyone here has debunked your theory countless times as it has more holes than a porn star.
That's NOT what that dude said. Learn to read.
2 years of research with no proof to give or show? You wasted 2 years of your life. Even kids in a middle school science fair know that have to show procedures, data, variables, conclusion, etc. You don't have shit so your research isn't even on the same level as a child.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks