2012 Gameplanning Thread (Playbooks)

[JeffHCross]

Alright, everyone probably knew it was coming but I am switching playbooks

Color me shocked

[Kingpin32]

In a twist of irony, I actually decided to stick with the Air Force playbook. My offense seemed to like that one the most.

[Oneback]

g, are you still using the 335 or did you decide on the switch to the 34?

[gschwendt]

g, are you still using the 335 or did you decide on the switch to the 34?

Still using the 3-3-5... I'm still learning it, especially when playing against a HUM opponent but I like some of the things I can do with it.

[psusnoop]

I dibbled a little bit with the 335 against Kingpin and it was quite effective in run defense but I was bringing it almost everytime I called it. I mixed a little zone but mostly man Cover 1 blitzes against him and James. James is a freak in this game.

[JeffHCross]

.

[Papa LoneStar]

The Texas Longhorns

Offense: Stanford (switchin from Alabama)
Defense: Multiple D (4-3 base....switching from 4-3)

Offense: Alabama
Defense: Multiple D

[gschwendt]

I've finished my User vs User games for the season (barring a Bowl matchup), however I'm playing around with different playbooks in preparation for next season. If I get a HUM opponent, I'll be sure to update.

[JeffHCross]

Just had a thought ... for sake of sanity, people who change their playbooks should probably go back to the first post and edit to somehow to indicate they changed. What I did was insert a link to the new post into my first one.

[Papa LoneStar]

Offense: Stanford
Defense: Multiple D

[gschwendt]

Offense: Idaho
Defense: 3-3-5

[JeffHCross]

.

[Papa LoneStar]

Offense: Stanford
Defense: Multiple D

*cough*....pardon me

Offense: Pittsburgh
Defense: Multiple D


*shoutout to G and that wonderful spread sheet

[JeffHCross]

Oh man, I do miss the Pitt book. Bread and butter last year.

[Oneback]

Michigan has switched playbooks (big surprise).

Offense: Air Force
Defense: 4-3

[Kingpin32]

Offense: Michigan
Defense: 3-4

This may come back to haunt me, but I liked Michigan's playbook after playing a few games with them.

[Kingpin32]

Offense: Michigan
Defense: 3-4

This may come back to haunt me, but I liked Michigan's playbook after playing a few games with them.

I decided to go with Nevada's playbook.

[gschwendt]

Michigan has switched playbooks (big surprise).

Offense: Air Force
Defense: 4-3

I hate to suggest this since I'll have to face it but have you looked at the Wake Forest playbook? Lots of great option looks including a Wishbone formation and quite a bit of I-Form options.

[Escobar]

Clemson Tigers

Offensive: Tulsa
Defensive: 4-2-5

[Oneback]

I hate to suggest this since I'll have to face it but have you looked at the Wake Forest playbook? Lots of great option looks including a Wishbone formation and quite a bit of I-Form options.

Air Force and Wake Forest were the two playbooks I narrowed it down to, I just like some of the plays in the Air Force book a little better. I still pray for a playbook/play creator next year.