Originally Posted by
steelerfan
Understood.
But, in real life, do backs win the Heisman in the MAC (a back who significantly split carries, no less)? No.
At the end of the day, IMO, this is about getting ridiculous numbers with a mediocre back. I play with bad teams, who have meh players, in meh conferences all the time and I don't win Heismans because I end up with stats that are in line with what the player might really do. For example, last year, I played with Akron and ULL.
If your numbers don't look similar to what the player may really do, your sliders are too easy for your skill set. If you generate unrealistic results, it's tough to ask the logic to handle it realistically.
All of that said, I agree with Jeff on this. The draft logic is likely ratings driven, and it should be. Great college players (statistically) are often not fit for the NFL and either do not go in the draft, or are late picks. If the player in question was an 85 OVR and there were 15 backs rated higher than him, why would he be drafted? Because I "usered" him to 2000 yards? He's still not one of the best backs, from a skill standpoint, in his class.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk 2